Cargando…
Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans
The biological effects of exposure to radioactive fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) were investigated in the lymphocytes of patients undergoing positron emission tomography (PET) procedures. Low-dose, radiation-induced cellular responses were measured using 3 different end points: (1) apoptosis; (2) ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26740810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325815611904 |
_version_ | 1782405548982927360 |
---|---|
author | Schnarr, Kara Carter, Timothy F. Gillis, Daniel Webber, Colin Lemon, Jennifer A. Dayes, Ian Dolling, Joanna A. Gulenchyn, Karen Boreham, Douglas R. |
author_facet | Schnarr, Kara Carter, Timothy F. Gillis, Daniel Webber, Colin Lemon, Jennifer A. Dayes, Ian Dolling, Joanna A. Gulenchyn, Karen Boreham, Douglas R. |
author_sort | Schnarr, Kara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The biological effects of exposure to radioactive fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) were investigated in the lymphocytes of patients undergoing positron emission tomography (PET) procedures. Low-dose, radiation-induced cellular responses were measured using 3 different end points: (1) apoptosis; (2) chromosome aberrations; and (3) γH2AX foci formation. The results showed no significant change in lymphocyte apoptosis, or chromosome aberrations, as a result of in vivo (18)F-FDG exposure, and there was no evidence the PET scan modified the apoptotic response of lymphocytes to a subsequent 2 Gy in vitro challenge irradiation. However, lymphocytes sampled from patients following a PET scan showed an average of 22.86% fewer chromosome breaks and 39.16% fewer dicentrics after a subsequent 2 Gy in vitro challenge irradiation. The effect of (18)F-FDG exposure on phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) in lymphocytes of patients showed a varied response between individuals. The relationship between γH2AX foci formation and increasing activity of (18)F-FDG was not directly proportional to dose. This variation is most likely attributed to differences in the factors that combine to constitute an individual’s radiation response. In summary, the results of this study indicate(18)F-FDG PET scans may not be detrimental but can elicit variable responses between individuals and can modify cellular response to subsequent radiation exposures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4679193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46791932016-01-06 Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans Schnarr, Kara Carter, Timothy F. Gillis, Daniel Webber, Colin Lemon, Jennifer A. Dayes, Ian Dolling, Joanna A. Gulenchyn, Karen Boreham, Douglas R. Dose Response Article The biological effects of exposure to radioactive fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) were investigated in the lymphocytes of patients undergoing positron emission tomography (PET) procedures. Low-dose, radiation-induced cellular responses were measured using 3 different end points: (1) apoptosis; (2) chromosome aberrations; and (3) γH2AX foci formation. The results showed no significant change in lymphocyte apoptosis, or chromosome aberrations, as a result of in vivo (18)F-FDG exposure, and there was no evidence the PET scan modified the apoptotic response of lymphocytes to a subsequent 2 Gy in vitro challenge irradiation. However, lymphocytes sampled from patients following a PET scan showed an average of 22.86% fewer chromosome breaks and 39.16% fewer dicentrics after a subsequent 2 Gy in vitro challenge irradiation. The effect of (18)F-FDG exposure on phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) in lymphocytes of patients showed a varied response between individuals. The relationship between γH2AX foci formation and increasing activity of (18)F-FDG was not directly proportional to dose. This variation is most likely attributed to differences in the factors that combine to constitute an individual’s radiation response. In summary, the results of this study indicate(18)F-FDG PET scans may not be detrimental but can elicit variable responses between individuals and can modify cellular response to subsequent radiation exposures. SAGE Publications 2015-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4679193/ /pubmed/26740810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325815611904 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Schnarr, Kara Carter, Timothy F. Gillis, Daniel Webber, Colin Lemon, Jennifer A. Dayes, Ian Dolling, Joanna A. Gulenchyn, Karen Boreham, Douglas R. Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans |
title | Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans |
title_full | Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans |
title_fullStr | Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans |
title_short | Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans |
title_sort | biological response of positron emission tomography scan exposure and adaptive response in humans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26740810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325815611904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnarrkara biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT cartertimothyf biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT gillisdaniel biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT webbercolin biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT lemonjennifera biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT dayesian biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT dollingjoannaa biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT gulenchynkaren biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans AT borehamdouglasr biologicalresponseofpositronemissiontomographyscanexposureandadaptiveresponseinhumans |