Cargando…
Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers
To present an update of the European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for serum markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Systematic literature survey from 2008 to 2013. The articles were evaluated by level of evidence and strength of recommendation. RESULTS: Because of its low sensitivity (50...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26588231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000586 |
_version_ | 1782405564619292672 |
---|---|
author | Sölétormos, György Duffy, Michael J. Othman Abu Hassan, Suher Verheijen, René H.M. Tholander, Bengt Bast, Robert C. Gaarenstroom, Katja N. Sturgeon, Catharine M. Bonfrer, Johannes M. Petersen, Per Hyltoft Troonen, Hugo CarloTorre, Gian Kanty Kulpa, Jan Tuxen, Malgorzata K. Molina, Raphael |
author_facet | Sölétormos, György Duffy, Michael J. Othman Abu Hassan, Suher Verheijen, René H.M. Tholander, Bengt Bast, Robert C. Gaarenstroom, Katja N. Sturgeon, Catharine M. Bonfrer, Johannes M. Petersen, Per Hyltoft Troonen, Hugo CarloTorre, Gian Kanty Kulpa, Jan Tuxen, Malgorzata K. Molina, Raphael |
author_sort | Sölétormos, György |
collection | PubMed |
description | To present an update of the European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for serum markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Systematic literature survey from 2008 to 2013. The articles were evaluated by level of evidence and strength of recommendation. RESULTS: Because of its low sensitivity (50–62% for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer) and limited specificity (94–98.5%), cancer antigen (CA) 125 (CA125) is not recommended as a screening test in asymptomatic women. The Risk of Malignancy Index, which includes CA125, transvaginal ultrasound, and menopausal status, is recommended for the differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass. Because human epididymis protein 4 has been reported to have superior specificity to CA125, especially in premenopausal women, it may be considered either alone or as part of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses, especially in such women. CA125 should be used to monitor response to first-line chemotherapy using the previously published criteria of the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup, that is, at least a 50% reduction of a pretreatment sample of 70 kU/L or greater. The value of CA125 in posttherapy surveillance is less clear. Although a prospective randomized trial concluded that early administration of chemotherapy based on increasing CA125 levels had no effect on survival, European Group on Tumor Markers state that monitoring with CA125 in this situation should occur, especially if the patient is a candidate for secondary cytoreductive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: At present, CA125 remains the most important biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer, excluding tumors of mucinous origin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4679342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46793422015-12-21 Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers Sölétormos, György Duffy, Michael J. Othman Abu Hassan, Suher Verheijen, René H.M. Tholander, Bengt Bast, Robert C. Gaarenstroom, Katja N. Sturgeon, Catharine M. Bonfrer, Johannes M. Petersen, Per Hyltoft Troonen, Hugo CarloTorre, Gian Kanty Kulpa, Jan Tuxen, Malgorzata K. Molina, Raphael Int J Gynecol Cancer Ovarian Cancer To present an update of the European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for serum markers in epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Systematic literature survey from 2008 to 2013. The articles were evaluated by level of evidence and strength of recommendation. RESULTS: Because of its low sensitivity (50–62% for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer) and limited specificity (94–98.5%), cancer antigen (CA) 125 (CA125) is not recommended as a screening test in asymptomatic women. The Risk of Malignancy Index, which includes CA125, transvaginal ultrasound, and menopausal status, is recommended for the differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass. Because human epididymis protein 4 has been reported to have superior specificity to CA125, especially in premenopausal women, it may be considered either alone or as part of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses, especially in such women. CA125 should be used to monitor response to first-line chemotherapy using the previously published criteria of the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup, that is, at least a 50% reduction of a pretreatment sample of 70 kU/L or greater. The value of CA125 in posttherapy surveillance is less clear. Although a prospective randomized trial concluded that early administration of chemotherapy based on increasing CA125 levels had no effect on survival, European Group on Tumor Markers state that monitoring with CA125 in this situation should occur, especially if the patient is a candidate for secondary cytoreductive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: At present, CA125 remains the most important biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer, excluding tumors of mucinous origin. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-01 2015-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4679342/ /pubmed/26588231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000586 Text en Copyright © 2015 by IGCS and ESGO This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Ovarian Cancer Sölétormos, György Duffy, Michael J. Othman Abu Hassan, Suher Verheijen, René H.M. Tholander, Bengt Bast, Robert C. Gaarenstroom, Katja N. Sturgeon, Catharine M. Bonfrer, Johannes M. Petersen, Per Hyltoft Troonen, Hugo CarloTorre, Gian Kanty Kulpa, Jan Tuxen, Malgorzata K. Molina, Raphael Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers |
title | Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers |
title_full | Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers |
title_fullStr | Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers |
title_short | Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers |
title_sort | clinical use of cancer biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer: updated guidelines from the european group on tumor markers |
topic | Ovarian Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26588231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soletormosgyorgy clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT duffymichaelj clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT othmanabuhassansuher clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT verheijenrenehm clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT tholanderbengt clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT bastrobertc clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT gaarenstroomkatjan clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT sturgeoncatharinem clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT bonfrerjohannesm clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT petersenperhyltoft clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT troonenhugo clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT carlotorregian clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT kantykulpajan clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT tuxenmalgorzatak clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers AT molinaraphael clinicaluseofcancerbiomarkersinepithelialovariancancerupdatedguidelinesfromtheeuropeangroupontumormarkers |