Cargando…

Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Health technology assessment is not required for regulatory submission or approval in either the United States (US) or Japan. This study was designed as a cross-country evaluation of cost analyses conducted in the US and Japan based on the PRONOUNCE phase III lung cancer trial, which c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hess, Lisa M., Rajan, Narayan, Winfree, Katherine, Davey, Peter, Ball, Mark, Knox, Hediyyih, Graham, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26650816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9
_version_ 1782405581953302528
author Hess, Lisa M.
Rajan, Narayan
Winfree, Katherine
Davey, Peter
Ball, Mark
Knox, Hediyyih
Graham, Christopher
author_facet Hess, Lisa M.
Rajan, Narayan
Winfree, Katherine
Davey, Peter
Ball, Mark
Knox, Hediyyih
Graham, Christopher
author_sort Hess, Lisa M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health technology assessment is not required for regulatory submission or approval in either the United States (US) or Japan. This study was designed as a cross-country evaluation of cost analyses conducted in the US and Japan based on the PRONOUNCE phase III lung cancer trial, which compared pemetrexed plus carboplatin followed by pemetrexed (PemC) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab (PCB). METHODS: Two cost analyses were conducted in accordance with International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research good research practice standards. Costs were obtained based on local pricing structures; outcomes were considered equivalent based on the PRONOUNCE trial results. Other inputs were included from the trial data (e.g., toxicity rates) or from local practice sources (e.g., toxicity management). The models were compared across key input and transferability factors. RESULTS: Despite differences in local input data, both models demonstrated a similar direction, with the cost of PemC being consistently lower than the cost of PCB. The variation in individual input parameters did affect some of the specific categories, such as toxicity, and impacted sensitivity analyses, with the cost differential between comparators being greater in Japan than in the US. CONCLUSION: When economic models are based on clinical trial data, many inputs and outcomes are held consistent. The alterable inputs were not in and of themselves large enough to significantly impact the results between countries, which were directionally consistent with greater variation seen in sensitivity analyses. The factors that vary across jurisdictions, even when minor, can have an impact on trial-based economic analyses. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4679782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46797822015-12-22 Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Hess, Lisa M. Rajan, Narayan Winfree, Katherine Davey, Peter Ball, Mark Knox, Hediyyih Graham, Christopher Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Health technology assessment is not required for regulatory submission or approval in either the United States (US) or Japan. This study was designed as a cross-country evaluation of cost analyses conducted in the US and Japan based on the PRONOUNCE phase III lung cancer trial, which compared pemetrexed plus carboplatin followed by pemetrexed (PemC) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab (PCB). METHODS: Two cost analyses were conducted in accordance with International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research good research practice standards. Costs were obtained based on local pricing structures; outcomes were considered equivalent based on the PRONOUNCE trial results. Other inputs were included from the trial data (e.g., toxicity rates) or from local practice sources (e.g., toxicity management). The models were compared across key input and transferability factors. RESULTS: Despite differences in local input data, both models demonstrated a similar direction, with the cost of PemC being consistently lower than the cost of PCB. The variation in individual input parameters did affect some of the specific categories, such as toxicity, and impacted sensitivity analyses, with the cost differential between comparators being greater in Japan than in the US. CONCLUSION: When economic models are based on clinical trial data, many inputs and outcomes are held consistent. The alterable inputs were not in and of themselves large enough to significantly impact the results between countries, which were directionally consistent with greater variation seen in sensitivity analyses. The factors that vary across jurisdictions, even when minor, can have an impact on trial-based economic analyses. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2015-12-09 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4679782/ /pubmed/26650816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hess, Lisa M.
Rajan, Narayan
Winfree, Katherine
Davey, Peter
Ball, Mark
Knox, Hediyyih
Graham, Christopher
Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort cost analyses in the us and japan: a cross-country comparative analysis applied to the pronounce trial in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26650816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hesslisam costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT rajannarayan costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT winfreekatherine costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT daveypeter costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ballmark costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT knoxhediyyih costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT grahamchristopher costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer