Cargando…
Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
INTRODUCTION: Health technology assessment is not required for regulatory submission or approval in either the United States (US) or Japan. This study was designed as a cross-country evaluation of cost analyses conducted in the US and Japan based on the PRONOUNCE phase III lung cancer trial, which c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26650816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9 |
_version_ | 1782405581953302528 |
---|---|
author | Hess, Lisa M. Rajan, Narayan Winfree, Katherine Davey, Peter Ball, Mark Knox, Hediyyih Graham, Christopher |
author_facet | Hess, Lisa M. Rajan, Narayan Winfree, Katherine Davey, Peter Ball, Mark Knox, Hediyyih Graham, Christopher |
author_sort | Hess, Lisa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Health technology assessment is not required for regulatory submission or approval in either the United States (US) or Japan. This study was designed as a cross-country evaluation of cost analyses conducted in the US and Japan based on the PRONOUNCE phase III lung cancer trial, which compared pemetrexed plus carboplatin followed by pemetrexed (PemC) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab (PCB). METHODS: Two cost analyses were conducted in accordance with International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research good research practice standards. Costs were obtained based on local pricing structures; outcomes were considered equivalent based on the PRONOUNCE trial results. Other inputs were included from the trial data (e.g., toxicity rates) or from local practice sources (e.g., toxicity management). The models were compared across key input and transferability factors. RESULTS: Despite differences in local input data, both models demonstrated a similar direction, with the cost of PemC being consistently lower than the cost of PCB. The variation in individual input parameters did affect some of the specific categories, such as toxicity, and impacted sensitivity analyses, with the cost differential between comparators being greater in Japan than in the US. CONCLUSION: When economic models are based on clinical trial data, many inputs and outcomes are held consistent. The alterable inputs were not in and of themselves large enough to significantly impact the results between countries, which were directionally consistent with greater variation seen in sensitivity analyses. The factors that vary across jurisdictions, even when minor, can have an impact on trial-based economic analyses. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4679782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46797822015-12-22 Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Hess, Lisa M. Rajan, Narayan Winfree, Katherine Davey, Peter Ball, Mark Knox, Hediyyih Graham, Christopher Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Health technology assessment is not required for regulatory submission or approval in either the United States (US) or Japan. This study was designed as a cross-country evaluation of cost analyses conducted in the US and Japan based on the PRONOUNCE phase III lung cancer trial, which compared pemetrexed plus carboplatin followed by pemetrexed (PemC) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab (PCB). METHODS: Two cost analyses were conducted in accordance with International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research good research practice standards. Costs were obtained based on local pricing structures; outcomes were considered equivalent based on the PRONOUNCE trial results. Other inputs were included from the trial data (e.g., toxicity rates) or from local practice sources (e.g., toxicity management). The models were compared across key input and transferability factors. RESULTS: Despite differences in local input data, both models demonstrated a similar direction, with the cost of PemC being consistently lower than the cost of PCB. The variation in individual input parameters did affect some of the specific categories, such as toxicity, and impacted sensitivity analyses, with the cost differential between comparators being greater in Japan than in the US. CONCLUSION: When economic models are based on clinical trial data, many inputs and outcomes are held consistent. The alterable inputs were not in and of themselves large enough to significantly impact the results between countries, which were directionally consistent with greater variation seen in sensitivity analyses. The factors that vary across jurisdictions, even when minor, can have an impact on trial-based economic analyses. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2015-12-09 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4679782/ /pubmed/26650816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hess, Lisa M. Rajan, Narayan Winfree, Katherine Davey, Peter Ball, Mark Knox, Hediyyih Graham, Christopher Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title | Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_full | Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_fullStr | Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_short | Cost Analyses in the US and Japan: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis Applied to the PRONOUNCE Trial in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer |
title_sort | cost analyses in the us and japan: a cross-country comparative analysis applied to the pronounce trial in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26650816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0270-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hesslisam costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer AT rajannarayan costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer AT winfreekatherine costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer AT daveypeter costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer AT ballmark costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer AT knoxhediyyih costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer AT grahamchristopher costanalysesintheusandjapanacrosscountrycomparativeanalysisappliedtothepronouncetrialinnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancer |