Cargando…

A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay (Oncotype DX(®), Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated predictor of recurrence risk/chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The Prosigna(®) assay (NanoString Te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvarado, Michael D., Prasad, Che, Rothney, Megan, Cherbavaz, Diana B., Sing, Amy P., Baehner, Frederick L., Svedman, Christer, Markopoulos, Christos J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2
_version_ 1782405582176649216
author Alvarado, Michael D.
Prasad, Che
Rothney, Megan
Cherbavaz, Diana B.
Sing, Amy P.
Baehner, Frederick L.
Svedman, Christer
Markopoulos, Christos J.
author_facet Alvarado, Michael D.
Prasad, Che
Rothney, Megan
Cherbavaz, Diana B.
Sing, Amy P.
Baehner, Frederick L.
Svedman, Christer
Markopoulos, Christos J.
author_sort Alvarado, Michael D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay (Oncotype DX(®), Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated predictor of recurrence risk/chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The Prosigna(®) assay (NanoString Technologies Inc.) is a validated prognosticator in postmenopausal patients with low-risk ER+ early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The assays were analytically/clinically developed and validated differently. This study focused on comparing recurrence risk estimates as determined by these assays and is the first blinded comparison of these assays on matched patient samples. METHODS: Sequential breast cancer specimens from postmenopausal, node-negative, ER+ patients treated at the Marin General Hospital were analyzed: first by the 21-gene assay then by the Prosigna assay in an independent lab blinded to the Recurrence Score results. RESULTS: The final analysis included 52 patients. Correlation between the Recurrence Score and the Prosigna assay results was poor (r = 0.08). Agreement between risk classifications based on these assays was 54%; 4/7 of patients classified as high risk by the Prosigna assay had low Recurrence Score results. Two tumors with high Recurrence Score results had low ER expression (close to positivity threshold); both of which had a low/intermediate Prosigna assay result. The Prosigna assay classified 73.1% and 23.1% of samples as luminal A and luminal B, respectively. A range of Recurrence Score results was observed within the subtypes; 83% of luminal B samples had a low Recurrence Score result. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior comparisons between the 21-gene and other genomic assays, our study demonstrated substantial differences in the way patients are risk stratified, suggesting that the different assays are not interchangeable. FUNDING: Genomic Health, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4679783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46797832015-12-22 A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Alvarado, Michael D. Prasad, Che Rothney, Megan Cherbavaz, Diana B. Sing, Amy P. Baehner, Frederick L. Svedman, Christer Markopoulos, Christos J. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay (Oncotype DX(®), Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated predictor of recurrence risk/chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The Prosigna(®) assay (NanoString Technologies Inc.) is a validated prognosticator in postmenopausal patients with low-risk ER+ early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The assays were analytically/clinically developed and validated differently. This study focused on comparing recurrence risk estimates as determined by these assays and is the first blinded comparison of these assays on matched patient samples. METHODS: Sequential breast cancer specimens from postmenopausal, node-negative, ER+ patients treated at the Marin General Hospital were analyzed: first by the 21-gene assay then by the Prosigna assay in an independent lab blinded to the Recurrence Score results. RESULTS: The final analysis included 52 patients. Correlation between the Recurrence Score and the Prosigna assay results was poor (r = 0.08). Agreement between risk classifications based on these assays was 54%; 4/7 of patients classified as high risk by the Prosigna assay had low Recurrence Score results. Two tumors with high Recurrence Score results had low ER expression (close to positivity threshold); both of which had a low/intermediate Prosigna assay result. The Prosigna assay classified 73.1% and 23.1% of samples as luminal A and luminal B, respectively. A range of Recurrence Score results was observed within the subtypes; 83% of luminal B samples had a low Recurrence Score result. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior comparisons between the 21-gene and other genomic assays, our study demonstrated substantial differences in the way patients are risk stratified, suggesting that the different assays are not interchangeable. FUNDING: Genomic Health, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2015-11-26 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4679783/ /pubmed/26610383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Alvarado, Michael D.
Prasad, Che
Rothney, Megan
Cherbavaz, Diana B.
Sing, Amy P.
Baehner, Frederick L.
Svedman, Christer
Markopoulos, Christos J.
A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
title A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
title_full A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
title_fullStr A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
title_short A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
title_sort prospective comparison of the 21-gene recurrence score and the pam50-based prosigna in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alvaradomichaeld aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT prasadche aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT rothneymegan aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT cherbavazdianab aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT singamyp aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT baehnerfrederickl aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT svedmanchrister aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT markopouloschristosj aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT alvaradomichaeld prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT prasadche prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT rothneymegan prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT cherbavazdianab prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT singamyp prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT baehnerfrederickl prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT svedmanchrister prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer
AT markopouloschristosj prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer