Cargando…
A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay (Oncotype DX(®), Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated predictor of recurrence risk/chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The Prosigna(®) assay (NanoString Te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2 |
_version_ | 1782405582176649216 |
---|---|
author | Alvarado, Michael D. Prasad, Che Rothney, Megan Cherbavaz, Diana B. Sing, Amy P. Baehner, Frederick L. Svedman, Christer Markopoulos, Christos J. |
author_facet | Alvarado, Michael D. Prasad, Che Rothney, Megan Cherbavaz, Diana B. Sing, Amy P. Baehner, Frederick L. Svedman, Christer Markopoulos, Christos J. |
author_sort | Alvarado, Michael D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay (Oncotype DX(®), Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated predictor of recurrence risk/chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The Prosigna(®) assay (NanoString Technologies Inc.) is a validated prognosticator in postmenopausal patients with low-risk ER+ early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The assays were analytically/clinically developed and validated differently. This study focused on comparing recurrence risk estimates as determined by these assays and is the first blinded comparison of these assays on matched patient samples. METHODS: Sequential breast cancer specimens from postmenopausal, node-negative, ER+ patients treated at the Marin General Hospital were analyzed: first by the 21-gene assay then by the Prosigna assay in an independent lab blinded to the Recurrence Score results. RESULTS: The final analysis included 52 patients. Correlation between the Recurrence Score and the Prosigna assay results was poor (r = 0.08). Agreement between risk classifications based on these assays was 54%; 4/7 of patients classified as high risk by the Prosigna assay had low Recurrence Score results. Two tumors with high Recurrence Score results had low ER expression (close to positivity threshold); both of which had a low/intermediate Prosigna assay result. The Prosigna assay classified 73.1% and 23.1% of samples as luminal A and luminal B, respectively. A range of Recurrence Score results was observed within the subtypes; 83% of luminal B samples had a low Recurrence Score result. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior comparisons between the 21-gene and other genomic assays, our study demonstrated substantial differences in the way patients are risk stratified, suggesting that the different assays are not interchangeable. FUNDING: Genomic Health, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4679783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46797832015-12-22 A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Alvarado, Michael D. Prasad, Che Rothney, Megan Cherbavaz, Diana B. Sing, Amy P. Baehner, Frederick L. Svedman, Christer Markopoulos, Christos J. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The 21-gene Recurrence Score(®) assay (Oncotype DX(®), Genomic Health, Inc.) is a validated predictor of recurrence risk/chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The Prosigna(®) assay (NanoString Technologies Inc.) is a validated prognosticator in postmenopausal patients with low-risk ER+ early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy. The assays were analytically/clinically developed and validated differently. This study focused on comparing recurrence risk estimates as determined by these assays and is the first blinded comparison of these assays on matched patient samples. METHODS: Sequential breast cancer specimens from postmenopausal, node-negative, ER+ patients treated at the Marin General Hospital were analyzed: first by the 21-gene assay then by the Prosigna assay in an independent lab blinded to the Recurrence Score results. RESULTS: The final analysis included 52 patients. Correlation between the Recurrence Score and the Prosigna assay results was poor (r = 0.08). Agreement between risk classifications based on these assays was 54%; 4/7 of patients classified as high risk by the Prosigna assay had low Recurrence Score results. Two tumors with high Recurrence Score results had low ER expression (close to positivity threshold); both of which had a low/intermediate Prosigna assay result. The Prosigna assay classified 73.1% and 23.1% of samples as luminal A and luminal B, respectively. A range of Recurrence Score results was observed within the subtypes; 83% of luminal B samples had a low Recurrence Score result. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior comparisons between the 21-gene and other genomic assays, our study demonstrated substantial differences in the way patients are risk stratified, suggesting that the different assays are not interchangeable. FUNDING: Genomic Health, Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2015-11-26 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4679783/ /pubmed/26610383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alvarado, Michael D. Prasad, Che Rothney, Megan Cherbavaz, Diana B. Sing, Amy P. Baehner, Frederick L. Svedman, Christer Markopoulos, Christos J. A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer |
title | A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer |
title_full | A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer |
title_short | A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer |
title_sort | prospective comparison of the 21-gene recurrence score and the pam50-based prosigna in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26610383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvaradomichaeld aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT prasadche aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT rothneymegan aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT cherbavazdianab aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT singamyp aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT baehnerfrederickl aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT svedmanchrister aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT markopouloschristosj aprospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT alvaradomichaeld prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT prasadche prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT rothneymegan prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT cherbavazdianab prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT singamyp prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT baehnerfrederickl prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT svedmanchrister prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer AT markopouloschristosj prospectivecomparisonofthe21generecurrencescoreandthepam50basedprosignainestrogenreceptorpositiveearlystagebreastcancer |