Cargando…

Home oxygen therapy reduces risk of hospitalisation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study, 2005–2012

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of home oxygen therapy (HOT) on hospital admissions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Using nationwide health insurance claims from 2002–2012, we conducted a longitudinal population-based retrospective cohort stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Kyoung Hee, Kim, Young Sam, Nam, Chung Mo, Kim, Tae Hyun, Kim, Sun Jung, Han, Kyu-Tae, Park, Eun-Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009065
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effect of home oxygen therapy (HOT) on hospital admissions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Using nationwide health insurance claims from 2002–2012, we conducted a longitudinal population-based retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals who were aged 40 years or above and newly diagnosed with COPD in 2005. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total number of hospitalisations during the study period. Participants were matched using HOT propensity scores and were stratified by respiratory impairment (grade 1: FEV(1) ≤25% or PaO(2) ≤55 mm Hg; grade 2: FEV(1) ≤30% or PaO(2) 56–60 mm Hg; grade 3: FEV(1) ≤40% or PaO(2) 61–65 mm Hg; ‘no grade’: FEV(1) or PaO(2) unknown), then a negative binomial regression analysis was performed for each group. RESULTS: Of the 36 761 COPD patients included in our study, 1330 (3.6%) received HOT. In a multivariate analysis of grade 1 patients performed before propensity score matching, the adjusted relative risk of hospitalisation for patients who did not receive HOT was 1.27 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.60). In a multivariate analysis of grade 1 patients performed after matching, the adjusted relative risk for patients who did not receive HOT was 1.65 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.18). In grade 2 or grade 3 patients, no statistical difference in hospital admission risk was detected. In the ‘no grade’ group of patients, HOT was associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation. CONCLUSIONS: HOT reduces the risk of hospital admission in COPD patients with severe hypoxaemia. However, apart from these patients, HOT use is not associated with hospital admissions.