Cargando…
Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care
OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experience of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) for depression in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy, REEACT). DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interviews with 36...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008581 |
_version_ | 1782405590164701184 |
---|---|
author | Knowles, Sarah E Lovell, Karina Bower, Peter Gilbody, Simon Littlewood, Elizabeth Lester, Helen |
author_facet | Knowles, Sarah E Lovell, Karina Bower, Peter Gilbody, Simon Littlewood, Elizabeth Lester, Helen |
author_sort | Knowles, Sarah E |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experience of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) for depression in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy, REEACT). DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interviews with 36 participants. PARTICIPANTS: Depressed patients with a Patient Health Questionnaire 9 of 10 or above recruited into the REEACT randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care settings in England. RESULTS: Participant experience was on a continuum, with some patients unable or unwilling to accept psychological therapy without interpersonal contact while others appreciated the enhanced anonymity and flexibility of cCBT. The majority of patients were ambivalent, recognising the potential benefits offered by cCBT but struggling with challenges posed by the severity of their illness, lack of support and limited personalisation of programme content. Low completion rates were commonly reported, although more positive patients reported greater engagement. Both positive and ambivalent patients perceived a need for monitoring or follow-up to support completion, while negative patients reported deliberate non-adherence due to dissatisfaction with the programme. Patients also reported that severity of depression impacted on engagement, and viewed cCBT as unsuitable for patients undergoing more severe depressive episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates both the unique demands and benefits of computerised therapy. cCBT was preferred by some patients and rejected by others, but the majority of patients were ambivalent about the therapy. cCBT could be offered within a menu of options in stepped care if matched appropriately to individual patients or could be offered with enhanced support to appeal to a greater number of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN91947481. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4679833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46798332015-12-18 Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care Knowles, Sarah E Lovell, Karina Bower, Peter Gilbody, Simon Littlewood, Elizabeth Lester, Helen BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experience of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) for depression in a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy, REEACT). DESIGN: Qualitative semistructured interviews with 36 participants. PARTICIPANTS: Depressed patients with a Patient Health Questionnaire 9 of 10 or above recruited into the REEACT randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care settings in England. RESULTS: Participant experience was on a continuum, with some patients unable or unwilling to accept psychological therapy without interpersonal contact while others appreciated the enhanced anonymity and flexibility of cCBT. The majority of patients were ambivalent, recognising the potential benefits offered by cCBT but struggling with challenges posed by the severity of their illness, lack of support and limited personalisation of programme content. Low completion rates were commonly reported, although more positive patients reported greater engagement. Both positive and ambivalent patients perceived a need for monitoring or follow-up to support completion, while negative patients reported deliberate non-adherence due to dissatisfaction with the programme. Patients also reported that severity of depression impacted on engagement, and viewed cCBT as unsuitable for patients undergoing more severe depressive episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates both the unique demands and benefits of computerised therapy. cCBT was preferred by some patients and rejected by others, but the majority of patients were ambivalent about the therapy. cCBT could be offered within a menu of options in stepped care if matched appropriately to individual patients or could be offered with enhanced support to appeal to a greater number of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN91947481. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4679833/ /pubmed/26621513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008581 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Knowles, Sarah E Lovell, Karina Bower, Peter Gilbody, Simon Littlewood, Elizabeth Lester, Helen Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
title | Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
title_full | Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
title_fullStr | Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
title_short | Patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
title_sort | patient experience of computerised therapy for depression in primary care |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knowlessarahe patientexperienceofcomputerisedtherapyfordepressioninprimarycare AT lovellkarina patientexperienceofcomputerisedtherapyfordepressioninprimarycare AT bowerpeter patientexperienceofcomputerisedtherapyfordepressioninprimarycare AT gilbodysimon patientexperienceofcomputerisedtherapyfordepressioninprimarycare AT littlewoodelizabeth patientexperienceofcomputerisedtherapyfordepressioninprimarycare AT lesterhelen patientexperienceofcomputerisedtherapyfordepressioninprimarycare |