Cargando…

Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature pertaining to the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ovarian cancer as a function of treatment stage. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 3623 patients with ovarian cancer from primary research investigatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watts, Sam, Prescott, Philip, Mason, Jessica, McLeod, Natalie, Lewith, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007618
_version_ 1782405592418091008
author Watts, Sam
Prescott, Philip
Mason, Jessica
McLeod, Natalie
Lewith, George
author_facet Watts, Sam
Prescott, Philip
Mason, Jessica
McLeod, Natalie
Lewith, George
author_sort Watts, Sam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature pertaining to the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ovarian cancer as a function of treatment stage. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 3623 patients with ovarian cancer from primary research investigations. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ovarian cancer as a function of treatment stage. RESULTS: We identified 24 full journal articles that met the inclusion criteria for entry into the meta-analysis resulting in a pooled sample size of 3623 patients. The meta-analysis of prevalence rates identified pretreatment, on-treatment and post-treatment depression prevalences of 25.34% (CI 22.79% to 28.07%), 22.99% (CI 19.85% to 26.46%) and 12.71% (CI 10.14% to 15.79%), respectively. Pretreatment, on-treatment and post-treatment anxiety prevalences were 19.12% (CI 17.11% to 21.30%), 26.23% (CI 22.30% to 30.56%) and 27.09% (CI 23.10% to 31.49%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with ovarian cancer, across the treatment spectrum, is significantly greater than in the healthy female population. With the growing emphasis on improving the management of survivorship and quality of life, we conclude that further research is warranted to ensure psychological distress in ovarian cancer is not underdiagnosed and undertreated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4679843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46798432015-12-18 Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates Watts, Sam Prescott, Philip Mason, Jessica McLeod, Natalie Lewith, George BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the literature pertaining to the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ovarian cancer as a function of treatment stage. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 3623 patients with ovarian cancer from primary research investigations. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with ovarian cancer as a function of treatment stage. RESULTS: We identified 24 full journal articles that met the inclusion criteria for entry into the meta-analysis resulting in a pooled sample size of 3623 patients. The meta-analysis of prevalence rates identified pretreatment, on-treatment and post-treatment depression prevalences of 25.34% (CI 22.79% to 28.07%), 22.99% (CI 19.85% to 26.46%) and 12.71% (CI 10.14% to 15.79%), respectively. Pretreatment, on-treatment and post-treatment anxiety prevalences were 19.12% (CI 17.11% to 21.30%), 26.23% (CI 22.30% to 30.56%) and 27.09% (CI 23.10% to 31.49%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with ovarian cancer, across the treatment spectrum, is significantly greater than in the healthy female population. With the growing emphasis on improving the management of survivorship and quality of life, we conclude that further research is warranted to ensure psychological distress in ovarian cancer is not underdiagnosed and undertreated. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4679843/ /pubmed/26621509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007618 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Watts, Sam
Prescott, Philip
Mason, Jessica
McLeod, Natalie
Lewith, George
Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
title Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
title_full Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
title_fullStr Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
title_full_unstemmed Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
title_short Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
title_sort depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007618
work_keys_str_mv AT wattssam depressionandanxietyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalencerates
AT prescottphilip depressionandanxietyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalencerates
AT masonjessica depressionandanxietyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalencerates
AT mcleodnatalie depressionandanxietyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalencerates
AT lewithgeorge depressionandanxietyinovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofprevalencerates