Cargando…
How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strateg...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981813 |
_version_ | 1782405624140660736 |
---|---|
author | Habertheuer, Andreas Wiedemann, Dominik Kocher, Alfred Laufer, Guenther Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth |
author_facet | Habertheuer, Andreas Wiedemann, Dominik Kocher, Alfred Laufer, Guenther Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth |
author_sort | Habertheuer, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strategies with varying degrees of hypothermia to achieve satisfactory protection of the brain from ischemic insults, that is, unilateral/bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP). Despite sophisticated and increasingly individualized surgical approaches for complex aortic pathologies, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal method of cerebral protection and circulatory management during the time of arch exclusion. Many recent studies argue in favor of ACP with various degrees of hypothermic arrest during arch reconstruction and its advantages have been widely demonstrated. In fact ACP with more moderate degrees of hypothermia represents a paradigm shift in the cardiac surgery community and is widely adopted as an emergent strategy; however, many centers continue to report good results using other perfusion strategies. Amidst this important discussion we review currently available surgical strategies of cerebral protection management and compare the results of recent European multicenter and single-center data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4680049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46800492015-12-28 How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement Habertheuer, Andreas Wiedemann, Dominik Kocher, Alfred Laufer, Guenther Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth Biomed Res Int Review Article Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strategies with varying degrees of hypothermia to achieve satisfactory protection of the brain from ischemic insults, that is, unilateral/bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP). Despite sophisticated and increasingly individualized surgical approaches for complex aortic pathologies, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal method of cerebral protection and circulatory management during the time of arch exclusion. Many recent studies argue in favor of ACP with various degrees of hypothermic arrest during arch reconstruction and its advantages have been widely demonstrated. In fact ACP with more moderate degrees of hypothermia represents a paradigm shift in the cardiac surgery community and is widely adopted as an emergent strategy; however, many centers continue to report good results using other perfusion strategies. Amidst this important discussion we review currently available surgical strategies of cerebral protection management and compare the results of recent European multicenter and single-center data. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4680049/ /pubmed/26713319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981813 Text en Copyright © 2015 Andreas Habertheuer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Habertheuer, Andreas Wiedemann, Dominik Kocher, Alfred Laufer, Guenther Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement |
title | How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement |
title_full | How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement |
title_fullStr | How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement |
title_short | How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement |
title_sort | how to perfuse: concepts of cerebral protection during arch replacement |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habertheuerandreas howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement AT wiedemanndominik howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement AT kocheralfred howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement AT lauferguenther howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement AT vallabhajosyulaprashanth howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement |