Cargando…

How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement

Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habertheuer, Andreas, Wiedemann, Dominik, Kocher, Alfred, Laufer, Guenther, Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981813
_version_ 1782405624140660736
author Habertheuer, Andreas
Wiedemann, Dominik
Kocher, Alfred
Laufer, Guenther
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
author_facet Habertheuer, Andreas
Wiedemann, Dominik
Kocher, Alfred
Laufer, Guenther
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
author_sort Habertheuer, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strategies with varying degrees of hypothermia to achieve satisfactory protection of the brain from ischemic insults, that is, unilateral/bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP). Despite sophisticated and increasingly individualized surgical approaches for complex aortic pathologies, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal method of cerebral protection and circulatory management during the time of arch exclusion. Many recent studies argue in favor of ACP with various degrees of hypothermic arrest during arch reconstruction and its advantages have been widely demonstrated. In fact ACP with more moderate degrees of hypothermia represents a paradigm shift in the cardiac surgery community and is widely adopted as an emergent strategy; however, many centers continue to report good results using other perfusion strategies. Amidst this important discussion we review currently available surgical strategies of cerebral protection management and compare the results of recent European multicenter and single-center data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4680049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46800492015-12-28 How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement Habertheuer, Andreas Wiedemann, Dominik Kocher, Alfred Laufer, Guenther Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth Biomed Res Int Review Article Arch surgery remains undoubtedly among the most technically and strategically challenging endeavors in cardiovascular surgery. Surgical interventions of thoracic aneurysms involving the aortic arch require complete circulatory arrest in deep hypothermia (DHCA) or elaborate cerebral perfusion strategies with varying degrees of hypothermia to achieve satisfactory protection of the brain from ischemic insults, that is, unilateral/bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) and retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP). Despite sophisticated and increasingly individualized surgical approaches for complex aortic pathologies, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal method of cerebral protection and circulatory management during the time of arch exclusion. Many recent studies argue in favor of ACP with various degrees of hypothermic arrest during arch reconstruction and its advantages have been widely demonstrated. In fact ACP with more moderate degrees of hypothermia represents a paradigm shift in the cardiac surgery community and is widely adopted as an emergent strategy; however, many centers continue to report good results using other perfusion strategies. Amidst this important discussion we review currently available surgical strategies of cerebral protection management and compare the results of recent European multicenter and single-center data. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4680049/ /pubmed/26713319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981813 Text en Copyright © 2015 Andreas Habertheuer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Habertheuer, Andreas
Wiedemann, Dominik
Kocher, Alfred
Laufer, Guenther
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
title How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
title_full How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
title_fullStr How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
title_full_unstemmed How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
title_short How to Perfuse: Concepts of Cerebral Protection during Arch Replacement
title_sort how to perfuse: concepts of cerebral protection during arch replacement
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/981813
work_keys_str_mv AT habertheuerandreas howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement
AT wiedemanndominik howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement
AT kocheralfred howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement
AT lauferguenther howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement
AT vallabhajosyulaprashanth howtoperfuseconceptsofcerebralprotectionduringarchreplacement