Cargando…

The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of viral hepatitis C (HCV) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) compared to the general population. A systematic search for the years 1989–2014 was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies on hepatitis C in HCWs were i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westermann, Claudia, Peters, Claudia, Lisiak, Birgitte, Lamberti, Monica, Nienhaus, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-102879
_version_ 1782405639413170176
author Westermann, Claudia
Peters, Claudia
Lisiak, Birgitte
Lamberti, Monica
Nienhaus, Albert
author_facet Westermann, Claudia
Peters, Claudia
Lisiak, Birgitte
Lamberti, Monica
Nienhaus, Albert
author_sort Westermann, Claudia
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of viral hepatitis C (HCV) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) compared to the general population. A systematic search for the years 1989–2014 was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies on hepatitis C in HCWs were included if they incorporated either a control group or reference data for the general population. The study quality was classified as high, moderate or low. Pooled effect estimates were calculated to determine the odds of occupational infection. Heterogeneity between studies was analysed using the χ(2) test (p<0.10) and quantified using the I(2) test. 57 studies met our criteria for inclusion and 44 were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of high and moderate quality studies showed a significantly increased OR for HCV infection in HCWs relative to control populations, with a value of 1.6 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.42). Stratification by study region gave an OR of 2.1 in low prevalence countries; while stratification by occupational groups gave an increased prevalence for medical (OR 2.2) and for laboratory staff (OR 2.2). The OR for professionals at high risk of blood contact was 2.7. The pooled analysis indicates that the prevalence of infection is significantly higher in HCWs than in the general population. The highest prevalence was observed among medical and laboratory staff. Prospective studies that focus on HCW-specific activity and personal risk factors for HCV infection are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4680146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46801462015-12-18 The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis Westermann, Claudia Peters, Claudia Lisiak, Birgitte Lamberti, Monica Nienhaus, Albert Occup Environ Med Review The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of viral hepatitis C (HCV) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) compared to the general population. A systematic search for the years 1989–2014 was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies on hepatitis C in HCWs were included if they incorporated either a control group or reference data for the general population. The study quality was classified as high, moderate or low. Pooled effect estimates were calculated to determine the odds of occupational infection. Heterogeneity between studies was analysed using the χ(2) test (p<0.10) and quantified using the I(2) test. 57 studies met our criteria for inclusion and 44 were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of high and moderate quality studies showed a significantly increased OR for HCV infection in HCWs relative to control populations, with a value of 1.6 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.42). Stratification by study region gave an OR of 2.1 in low prevalence countries; while stratification by occupational groups gave an increased prevalence for medical (OR 2.2) and for laboratory staff (OR 2.2). The OR for professionals at high risk of blood contact was 2.7. The pooled analysis indicates that the prevalence of infection is significantly higher in HCWs than in the general population. The highest prevalence was observed among medical and laboratory staff. Prospective studies that focus on HCW-specific activity and personal risk factors for HCV infection are needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4680146/ /pubmed/26438666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-102879 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Westermann, Claudia
Peters, Claudia
Lisiak, Birgitte
Lamberti, Monica
Nienhaus, Albert
The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of hepatitis c among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-102879
work_keys_str_mv AT westermannclaudia theprevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT petersclaudia theprevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisiakbirgitte theprevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lambertimonica theprevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nienhausalbert theprevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT westermannclaudia prevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT petersclaudia prevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisiakbirgitte prevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lambertimonica prevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nienhausalbert prevalenceofhepatitiscamonghealthcareworkersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis