Cargando…
Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications
OBJECTIVE: Valid, reliable critical appraisal tools advance quality improvement (QI) intervention impacts by helping stakeholders identify higher quality studies. QI approaches are diverse and differ from clinical interventions. Widely used critical appraisal instruments do not take unique QI featur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151 |
_version_ | 1782405643146100736 |
---|---|
author | Hempel, Susanne Shekelle, Paul G Liu, Jodi L Sherwood Danz, Margie Foy, Robbie Lim, Yee-Wei Motala, Aneesa Rubenstein, Lisa V |
author_facet | Hempel, Susanne Shekelle, Paul G Liu, Jodi L Sherwood Danz, Margie Foy, Robbie Lim, Yee-Wei Motala, Aneesa Rubenstein, Lisa V |
author_sort | Hempel, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Valid, reliable critical appraisal tools advance quality improvement (QI) intervention impacts by helping stakeholders identify higher quality studies. QI approaches are diverse and differ from clinical interventions. Widely used critical appraisal instruments do not take unique QI features into account and existing QI tools (eg, Standards for QI Reporting Excellence) are intended for publication guidance rather than critical appraisal. This study developed and psychometrically tested a critical appraisal instrument, the QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) for assessing QI-specific features of QI publications. METHODS: Approaches to developing the tool and ensuring validity included a literature review, in-person and online survey expert panel input, and application to empirical examples. We investigated psychometric properties in a set of diverse QI publications (N=54) by analysing reliability measures and item endorsement rates and explored sources of disagreement between reviewers. RESULTS: The QI-MQCS includes 16 content domains to evaluate QI intervention publications: Organisational Motivation, Intervention Rationale, Intervention Description, Organisational Characteristics, Implementation, Study Design, Comparator Description, Data Sources, Timing, Adherence/Fidelity, Health Outcomes, Organisational Readiness, Penetration/Reach, Sustainability, Spread and Limitations. Median inter-rater agreement for QI-MQCS items was κ 0.57 (83% agreement). Item statistics indicated sufficient ability to differentiate between publications (median quality criteria met 67%). Internal consistency measures indicated coherence without excessive conceptual overlap (absolute mean interitem correlation=0.19). The critical appraisal instrument is accompanied by a user manual detailing What to consider, Where to look and How to rate. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a ready-to-use, valid and reliable critical appraisal instrument applicable to healthcare QI intervention publications, but recognise scope for continuing refinement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4680162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46801622015-12-18 Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications Hempel, Susanne Shekelle, Paul G Liu, Jodi L Sherwood Danz, Margie Foy, Robbie Lim, Yee-Wei Motala, Aneesa Rubenstein, Lisa V BMJ Qual Saf Research and Reporting Methodology OBJECTIVE: Valid, reliable critical appraisal tools advance quality improvement (QI) intervention impacts by helping stakeholders identify higher quality studies. QI approaches are diverse and differ from clinical interventions. Widely used critical appraisal instruments do not take unique QI features into account and existing QI tools (eg, Standards for QI Reporting Excellence) are intended for publication guidance rather than critical appraisal. This study developed and psychometrically tested a critical appraisal instrument, the QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) for assessing QI-specific features of QI publications. METHODS: Approaches to developing the tool and ensuring validity included a literature review, in-person and online survey expert panel input, and application to empirical examples. We investigated psychometric properties in a set of diverse QI publications (N=54) by analysing reliability measures and item endorsement rates and explored sources of disagreement between reviewers. RESULTS: The QI-MQCS includes 16 content domains to evaluate QI intervention publications: Organisational Motivation, Intervention Rationale, Intervention Description, Organisational Characteristics, Implementation, Study Design, Comparator Description, Data Sources, Timing, Adherence/Fidelity, Health Outcomes, Organisational Readiness, Penetration/Reach, Sustainability, Spread and Limitations. Median inter-rater agreement for QI-MQCS items was κ 0.57 (83% agreement). Item statistics indicated sufficient ability to differentiate between publications (median quality criteria met 67%). Internal consistency measures indicated coherence without excessive conceptual overlap (absolute mean interitem correlation=0.19). The critical appraisal instrument is accompanied by a user manual detailing What to consider, Where to look and How to rate. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a ready-to-use, valid and reliable critical appraisal instrument applicable to healthcare QI intervention publications, but recognise scope for continuing refinement. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4680162/ /pubmed/26311020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research and Reporting Methodology Hempel, Susanne Shekelle, Paul G Liu, Jodi L Sherwood Danz, Margie Foy, Robbie Lim, Yee-Wei Motala, Aneesa Rubenstein, Lisa V Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
title | Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
title_full | Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
title_fullStr | Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
title_short | Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
title_sort | development of the quality improvement minimum quality criteria set (qi-mqcs): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications |
topic | Research and Reporting Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4680162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hempelsusanne developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT shekellepaulg developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT liujodil developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT sherwooddanzmargie developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT foyrobbie developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT limyeewei developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT motalaaneesa developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications AT rubensteinlisav developmentofthequalityimprovementminimumqualitycriteriasetqimqcsatoolforcriticalappraisalofqualityimprovementinterventionpublications |