Cargando…

A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are prevalent in hospitalized patients; they may cause clinical, psychological, and economic problems in these patients. Previous studies are cross-sectional, have used pooled data, or cox-regression models to assess the risk for developing PU. However, PU risk scor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Elizebeth, Vinodkumar, Sudhaya, Mathew, Silvia, Setia, Maninder Singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677269
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.169127
_version_ 1782405718785130496
author Thomas, Elizebeth
Vinodkumar, Sudhaya
Mathew, Silvia
Setia, Maninder Singh
author_facet Thomas, Elizebeth
Vinodkumar, Sudhaya
Mathew, Silvia
Setia, Maninder Singh
author_sort Thomas, Elizebeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are prevalent in hospitalized patients; they may cause clinical, psychological, and economic problems in these patients. Previous studies are cross-sectional, have used pooled data, or cox-regression models to assess the risk for developing PU. However, PU risk scores change over time and models that account for time varying variables are useful for cohort analysis of data. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The present longitudinal study was conducted to compare the risk of PU between surgical and nonsurgical patients, and to evaluate the factors associated with the development of these ulcers over a period of time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 290 hospitalized patients over a 4 months period. The main outcomes for our analysis were: (1) Score on the pressure risk assessment scale; and (2) the proportion of individuals who were at severe risk for developing PUs. We used random effects models for longitudinal analysis of the data. RESULTS: The mean PU score was significantly higher in the nonsurgical patients compared with surgical patients at baseline (15.23 [3.86] vs. 9.33 [4.57]; P < 0.01). About 7% of the total patients had a score of >20 at baseline and were considered as being at high-risk for PU; the proportion was significantly higher among the nonsurgical patients compared with the surgical patients (14% vs. 4%, P = 0.003). In the adjusted models, there was no difference for severe risk for PU between surgical and nonsurgical patients (odds ratios [ORs]: 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–12.80). An additional day in the ward was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of being at high-risk for PU (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16–1.86). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between patients who were admitted for surgery compared with those who were not. An additional day in the ward, however, is important for developing a high-risk score for PU on the monitoring scale, and these patients require active interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4681194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46811942015-12-16 A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis Thomas, Elizebeth Vinodkumar, Sudhaya Mathew, Silvia Setia, Maninder Singh Indian J Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are prevalent in hospitalized patients; they may cause clinical, psychological, and economic problems in these patients. Previous studies are cross-sectional, have used pooled data, or cox-regression models to assess the risk for developing PU. However, PU risk scores change over time and models that account for time varying variables are useful for cohort analysis of data. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The present longitudinal study was conducted to compare the risk of PU between surgical and nonsurgical patients, and to evaluate the factors associated with the development of these ulcers over a period of time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 290 hospitalized patients over a 4 months period. The main outcomes for our analysis were: (1) Score on the pressure risk assessment scale; and (2) the proportion of individuals who were at severe risk for developing PUs. We used random effects models for longitudinal analysis of the data. RESULTS: The mean PU score was significantly higher in the nonsurgical patients compared with surgical patients at baseline (15.23 [3.86] vs. 9.33 [4.57]; P < 0.01). About 7% of the total patients had a score of >20 at baseline and were considered as being at high-risk for PU; the proportion was significantly higher among the nonsurgical patients compared with the surgical patients (14% vs. 4%, P = 0.003). In the adjusted models, there was no difference for severe risk for PU between surgical and nonsurgical patients (odds ratios [ORs]: 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–12.80). An additional day in the ward was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of being at high-risk for PU (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16–1.86). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between patients who were admitted for surgery compared with those who were not. An additional day in the ward, however, is important for developing a high-risk score for PU on the monitoring scale, and these patients require active interventions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4681194/ /pubmed/26677269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.169127 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thomas, Elizebeth
Vinodkumar, Sudhaya
Mathew, Silvia
Setia, Maninder Singh
A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis
title A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis
title_full A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis
title_fullStr A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis
title_short A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis
title_sort study of the factors associated with risk for development of pressure ulcers: a longitudinal analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677269
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.169127
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaselizebeth astudyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT vinodkumarsudhaya astudyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT mathewsilvia astudyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT setiamanindersingh astudyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT thomaselizebeth studyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT vinodkumarsudhaya studyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT mathewsilvia studyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis
AT setiamanindersingh studyofthefactorsassociatedwithriskfordevelopmentofpressureulcersalongitudinalanalysis