Cargando…
Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile isolates to cadazolid, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of C. difficile infection. METHODS: Ribotyping and susceptibilities were determined for C. difficile isolates from a multicentre, double-blind,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv300 |
_version_ | 1782405744449028096 |
---|---|
author | Gerding, D. N. Hecht, D. W. Louie, T. Nord, C. E. Talbot, G. H. Cornely, O. A. Buitrago, M. Best, E. Sambol, S. Osmolski, J. R. Kracker, H. Locher, H. H. Charef, P. Wilcox, M. |
author_facet | Gerding, D. N. Hecht, D. W. Louie, T. Nord, C. E. Talbot, G. H. Cornely, O. A. Buitrago, M. Best, E. Sambol, S. Osmolski, J. R. Kracker, H. Locher, H. H. Charef, P. Wilcox, M. |
author_sort | Gerding, D. N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile isolates to cadazolid, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of C. difficile infection. METHODS: Ribotyping and susceptibilities were determined for C. difficile isolates from a multicentre, double-blind, Phase 2 study of oral cadazolid in patients with C. difficile infection (NCT01222702, ClinicalTrials.gov; EudraCT 2010-020941-29, European Clinical Trials Database). Patients were randomized to receive 250, 500 or 1000 mg of cadazolid twice daily or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily, for 10 days. MICs of cadazolid, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, linezolid and moxifloxacin were determined at baseline for all patients and post-baseline for patients with clinical failure or recurrence, using the agar dilution method. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 84 patients had an evaluable toxigenic C. difficile isolate at baseline. The most frequent PCR ribotype was 027 (15.4%). Cadazolid MICs for baseline isolates (including epidemic strain 027) ranged from 0.06 to 0.25 mg/L. Baseline cadazolid MICs were similar to those of fidaxomicin and lower than those of vancomycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin. For each clinical outcome group (clinical cure, clinical failure, sustained clinical response and clinical failure or recurrence), the baseline cadazolid MIC range was 0.06–0.25 mg/L. Mean (min–max) cadazolid faecal concentration (μg/g) on day 5 was 884 (101–2710), 1706 (204–4230) and 3226 (1481–12 600) for the doses 250, 500 and 1000 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For all cadazolid doses, the faecal concentration was in excess of several thousand-fold the MIC(90) for C. difficile. The MIC of cadazolid for all C. difficile isolates, including epidemic strains, was low and in the same narrow range regardless of treatment outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4681371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46813712015-12-16 Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection Gerding, D. N. Hecht, D. W. Louie, T. Nord, C. E. Talbot, G. H. Cornely, O. A. Buitrago, M. Best, E. Sambol, S. Osmolski, J. R. Kracker, H. Locher, H. H. Charef, P. Wilcox, M. J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the susceptibilities of Clostridium difficile isolates to cadazolid, a novel antibiotic for the treatment of C. difficile infection. METHODS: Ribotyping and susceptibilities were determined for C. difficile isolates from a multicentre, double-blind, Phase 2 study of oral cadazolid in patients with C. difficile infection (NCT01222702, ClinicalTrials.gov; EudraCT 2010-020941-29, European Clinical Trials Database). Patients were randomized to receive 250, 500 or 1000 mg of cadazolid twice daily or 125 mg of vancomycin four times daily, for 10 days. MICs of cadazolid, vancomycin, fidaxomicin, linezolid and moxifloxacin were determined at baseline for all patients and post-baseline for patients with clinical failure or recurrence, using the agar dilution method. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 84 patients had an evaluable toxigenic C. difficile isolate at baseline. The most frequent PCR ribotype was 027 (15.4%). Cadazolid MICs for baseline isolates (including epidemic strain 027) ranged from 0.06 to 0.25 mg/L. Baseline cadazolid MICs were similar to those of fidaxomicin and lower than those of vancomycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin. For each clinical outcome group (clinical cure, clinical failure, sustained clinical response and clinical failure or recurrence), the baseline cadazolid MIC range was 0.06–0.25 mg/L. Mean (min–max) cadazolid faecal concentration (μg/g) on day 5 was 884 (101–2710), 1706 (204–4230) and 3226 (1481–12 600) for the doses 250, 500 and 1000 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For all cadazolid doses, the faecal concentration was in excess of several thousand-fold the MIC(90) for C. difficile. The MIC of cadazolid for all C. difficile isolates, including epidemic strains, was low and in the same narrow range regardless of treatment outcome. Oxford University Press 2016-01 2015-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4681371/ /pubmed/26433782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv300 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gerding, D. N. Hecht, D. W. Louie, T. Nord, C. E. Talbot, G. H. Cornely, O. A. Buitrago, M. Best, E. Sambol, S. Osmolski, J. R. Kracker, H. Locher, H. H. Charef, P. Wilcox, M. Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection |
title | Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection |
title_full | Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection |
title_fullStr | Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection |
title_short | Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in C. difficile infection |
title_sort | susceptibility of clostridium difficile isolates from a phase 2 clinical trial of cadazolid and vancomycin in c. difficile infection |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerdingdn susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT hechtdw susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT louiet susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT nordce susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT talbotgh susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT cornelyoa susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT buitragom susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT beste susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT sambols susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT osmolskijr susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT krackerh susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT locherhh susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT charefp susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection AT wilcoxm susceptibilityofclostridiumdifficileisolatesfromaphase2clinicaltrialofcadazolidandvancomycinincdifficileinfection |