Cargando…

Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys

Objective To compare oral health in the US and England and to assess levels of educational and income related oral health inequalities between both countries. Design Cross sectional analysis of US and English national surveys. Setting Non-institutionalised adults living in their own homes. Participa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C, Tsakos, Georgios, Sheiham, Aubrey, Marmot, Michael G, Kawachi, Ichiro, Watt, Richard G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6543
_version_ 1782405766465978368
author Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
Tsakos, Georgios
Sheiham, Aubrey
Marmot, Michael G
Kawachi, Ichiro
Watt, Richard G
author_facet Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
Tsakos, Georgios
Sheiham, Aubrey
Marmot, Michael G
Kawachi, Ichiro
Watt, Richard G
author_sort Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare oral health in the US and England and to assess levels of educational and income related oral health inequalities between both countries. Design Cross sectional analysis of US and English national surveys. Setting Non-institutionalised adults living in their own homes. Participants Oral health measures and socioeconomic indicators were assessed in nationally representative samples: the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009 for England, and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-08. Adults aged ≥25 years were included in analyses with samples of 8719 (England) and 9786 (US) for analyses by education, and 7184 (England) and 9094 (US) for analyses by income. Main outcome measures Number of missing teeth, self rated oral health, and oral impacts on daily life were outcomes. Educational attainment and household income were used as socioeconomic indicators. Age standardised estimates of oral health were compared between countries and across educational and income groups. Regression models were fitted, and relative and absolute inequalities were measured using the relative index of inequality (RII) and the slope index of inequality (SII). Results The mean number of missing teeth was significantly higher in the US (7.31 (standard error 0.15)) than in England (6.97 (0.09)), while oral impacts were higher in England. There was evidence of significant social gradients in oral health in both countries, although differences in oral health by socioeconomic position varied according to the oral health measure used. Consistently higher RII and SII values were found in the US than in England, particularly for self rated oral health. RII estimates for self rated oral health by education were 3.67 (95% confidence interval 3.23 to 4.17) in the US and 1.83 (1.59 to 2.11) in England. In turn, SII values were 42.55 (38.14 to 46.96) in the US and 18.43 (14.01 to 22.85) in England. Conclusions The oral health of US citizens is not better than the English, and there are consistently wider educational and income oral health inequalities in the US compared with England.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4681766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46817662015-12-18 Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C Tsakos, Georgios Sheiham, Aubrey Marmot, Michael G Kawachi, Ichiro Watt, Richard G BMJ Research Objective To compare oral health in the US and England and to assess levels of educational and income related oral health inequalities between both countries. Design Cross sectional analysis of US and English national surveys. Setting Non-institutionalised adults living in their own homes. Participants Oral health measures and socioeconomic indicators were assessed in nationally representative samples: the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009 for England, and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-08. Adults aged ≥25 years were included in analyses with samples of 8719 (England) and 9786 (US) for analyses by education, and 7184 (England) and 9094 (US) for analyses by income. Main outcome measures Number of missing teeth, self rated oral health, and oral impacts on daily life were outcomes. Educational attainment and household income were used as socioeconomic indicators. Age standardised estimates of oral health were compared between countries and across educational and income groups. Regression models were fitted, and relative and absolute inequalities were measured using the relative index of inequality (RII) and the slope index of inequality (SII). Results The mean number of missing teeth was significantly higher in the US (7.31 (standard error 0.15)) than in England (6.97 (0.09)), while oral impacts were higher in England. There was evidence of significant social gradients in oral health in both countries, although differences in oral health by socioeconomic position varied according to the oral health measure used. Consistently higher RII and SII values were found in the US than in England, particularly for self rated oral health. RII estimates for self rated oral health by education were 3.67 (95% confidence interval 3.23 to 4.17) in the US and 1.83 (1.59 to 2.11) in England. In turn, SII values were 42.55 (38.14 to 46.96) in the US and 18.43 (14.01 to 22.85) in England. Conclusions The oral health of US citizens is not better than the English, and there are consistently wider educational and income oral health inequalities in the US compared with England. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4681766/ /pubmed/26676027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6543 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol C
Tsakos, Georgios
Sheiham, Aubrey
Marmot, Michael G
Kawachi, Ichiro
Watt, Richard G
Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys
title Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys
title_full Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys
title_fullStr Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys
title_full_unstemmed Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys
title_short Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys
title_sort austin powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of us and english national oral health surveys
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6543
work_keys_str_mv AT guarnizoherrenocarolc austinpowersbitesbackacrosssectionalcomparisonofusandenglishnationaloralhealthsurveys
AT tsakosgeorgios austinpowersbitesbackacrosssectionalcomparisonofusandenglishnationaloralhealthsurveys
AT sheihamaubrey austinpowersbitesbackacrosssectionalcomparisonofusandenglishnationaloralhealthsurveys
AT marmotmichaelg austinpowersbitesbackacrosssectionalcomparisonofusandenglishnationaloralhealthsurveys
AT kawachiichiro austinpowersbitesbackacrosssectionalcomparisonofusandenglishnationaloralhealthsurveys
AT wattrichardg austinpowersbitesbackacrosssectionalcomparisonofusandenglishnationaloralhealthsurveys