Cargando…

Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine

Drug resistance still impedes successful cancer chemotherapy. A major goal of early concepts in individualized therapy was to develop in vitro tests to predict tumors’ drug responsiveness. We have developed an in vitro short-term test based on nucleic acid precursor incorporation to determine clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volm, Manfred, Efferth, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00282
_version_ 1782405770090905600
author Volm, Manfred
Efferth, Thomas
author_facet Volm, Manfred
Efferth, Thomas
author_sort Volm, Manfred
collection PubMed
description Drug resistance still impedes successful cancer chemotherapy. A major goal of early concepts in individualized therapy was to develop in vitro tests to predict tumors’ drug responsiveness. We have developed an in vitro short-term test based on nucleic acid precursor incorporation to determine clinical drug resistance. This test detects inherent and acquired resistance in vitro and transplantable syngeneic and xenografted tumors in vivo. In several clinical trials, clinical resistance was predictable with more than 90% accuracy, while drug sensitivity was detected with less accuracy (~60%). Remarkably, clinical cross-resistance to numerous drugs (multidrug resistance, broad spectrum resistance) was detectable by a single compound, doxorubicin, due to its multifactorial modes of action. The results of this predictive test were in good agreement with predictive assays of other authors. As no predictive test has been established as yet for clinical diagnostics, the identification of sensitive drugs may not reach sufficiently high reliability for clinical routine. A meta-analysis of the literature published during the past four decades considering test results of more than 15,000 tumor patients unambiguously demonstrated that, in the majority of studies, resistance was correctly predicted with an accuracy between 80 and 100%, while drug sensitivity could only be predicted with an accuracy of 50–80%. This synopsis of the published literature impressively illustrates that prediction of drug resistance could be validated. The determination of drug resistance was reliable independent of tumor type, test assay, and drug used in these in vitro tests. By contrast, chemosensitivity could not be predicted with high reliability. Therefore, we propose a rethinking of the “chemosensitivity” concept. Instead, predictive in vitro tests may reliably identify drug-resistant tumors. The clinical consequence imply to subject resistant tumors not to chemotherapy, but to other new treatment options, such as antibody therapy, adoptive immune therapy, hyperthermia, gene therapy, etc. The high accuracy to predict resistant tumors may be exploited to develop new strategies for individualized cancer therapy. This new concept bears the potential of a revival of predictive tests for personalized medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4681783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46817832016-01-05 Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine Volm, Manfred Efferth, Thomas Front Oncol Oncology Drug resistance still impedes successful cancer chemotherapy. A major goal of early concepts in individualized therapy was to develop in vitro tests to predict tumors’ drug responsiveness. We have developed an in vitro short-term test based on nucleic acid precursor incorporation to determine clinical drug resistance. This test detects inherent and acquired resistance in vitro and transplantable syngeneic and xenografted tumors in vivo. In several clinical trials, clinical resistance was predictable with more than 90% accuracy, while drug sensitivity was detected with less accuracy (~60%). Remarkably, clinical cross-resistance to numerous drugs (multidrug resistance, broad spectrum resistance) was detectable by a single compound, doxorubicin, due to its multifactorial modes of action. The results of this predictive test were in good agreement with predictive assays of other authors. As no predictive test has been established as yet for clinical diagnostics, the identification of sensitive drugs may not reach sufficiently high reliability for clinical routine. A meta-analysis of the literature published during the past four decades considering test results of more than 15,000 tumor patients unambiguously demonstrated that, in the majority of studies, resistance was correctly predicted with an accuracy between 80 and 100%, while drug sensitivity could only be predicted with an accuracy of 50–80%. This synopsis of the published literature impressively illustrates that prediction of drug resistance could be validated. The determination of drug resistance was reliable independent of tumor type, test assay, and drug used in these in vitro tests. By contrast, chemosensitivity could not be predicted with high reliability. Therefore, we propose a rethinking of the “chemosensitivity” concept. Instead, predictive in vitro tests may reliably identify drug-resistant tumors. The clinical consequence imply to subject resistant tumors not to chemotherapy, but to other new treatment options, such as antibody therapy, adoptive immune therapy, hyperthermia, gene therapy, etc. The high accuracy to predict resistant tumors may be exploited to develop new strategies for individualized cancer therapy. This new concept bears the potential of a revival of predictive tests for personalized medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4681783/ /pubmed/26734568 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00282 Text en Copyright © 2015 Volm and Efferth. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Volm, Manfred
Efferth, Thomas
Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine
title Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine
title_full Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine
title_fullStr Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine
title_short Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine
title_sort prediction of cancer drug resistance and implications for personalized medicine
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734568
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00282
work_keys_str_mv AT volmmanfred predictionofcancerdrugresistanceandimplicationsforpersonalizedmedicine
AT efferththomas predictionofcancerdrugresistanceandimplicationsforpersonalizedmedicine