Cargando…

Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes compared with an infarct-related artery (IRA)-only strategy in patients being treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) who have multivessel disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCann, Gerry P., Khan, Jamal N., Greenwood, John P., Nazir, Sheraz, Dalby, Miles, Curzen, Nick, Hetherington, Simon, Kelly, Damian J., Blackman, Daniel J., Ring, Arne, Peebles, Charles, Wong, Joyce, Sasikaran, Thiagarajah, Flather, Marcus, Swanton, Howard, Gershlick, Anthony H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Biomedical 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099
_version_ 1782405783181328384
author McCann, Gerry P.
Khan, Jamal N.
Greenwood, John P.
Nazir, Sheraz
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel J.
Ring, Arne
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Sasikaran, Thiagarajah
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
author_facet McCann, Gerry P.
Khan, Jamal N.
Greenwood, John P.
Nazir, Sheraz
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel J.
Ring, Arne
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Sasikaran, Thiagarajah
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
author_sort McCann, Gerry P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes compared with an infarct-related artery (IRA)-only strategy in patients being treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) who have multivessel disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is concern that non-IRA PCI may cause additional non-IRA myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether in-hospital complete revascularization was associated with increased total infarct size compared with an IRA-only strategy. METHODS: This multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial evaluated STEMI patients with multivessel disease having PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized to either IRA-only PCI or complete in-hospital revascularization. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed following PPCI (median day 3) and stress CMR at 9 months. The pre-specified primary endpoint was infarct size on pre-discharge CMR. The study had 80% power to detect a 4% difference in infarct size with 100 patients per group. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients in the main trial, 205 participated in the CMR substudy, and 203 patients (98 complete revascularization and 105 IRA-only) completed the pre-discharge CMR. The groups were well-matched. Total infarct size (median, interquartile range) was similar to IRA-only revascularization: 13.5% (6.2% to 21.9%) versus complete revascularization, 12.6% (7.2% to 22.6%) of left ventricular mass, p = 0.57 (95% confidence interval for difference in geometric means 0.82 to 1.41). The complete revascularization group had an increase in non-IRA MI on the pre-discharge CMR (22 of 98 vs. 11 of 105, p = 0.02). There was no difference in total infarct size or ischemic burden between treatment groups at follow-up CMR. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel PCI in the setting of STEMI leads to a small increase in CMR-detected non-IRA MI, but total infarct size was not significantly different from an IRA-only revascularization strategy. (Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI Pilot Study [CvLPRIT]; ISRCTN70913605)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4681843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier Biomedical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46818432016-01-11 Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy McCann, Gerry P. Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel J. Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. J Am Coll Cardiol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes compared with an infarct-related artery (IRA)-only strategy in patients being treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) who have multivessel disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is concern that non-IRA PCI may cause additional non-IRA myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether in-hospital complete revascularization was associated with increased total infarct size compared with an IRA-only strategy. METHODS: This multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial evaluated STEMI patients with multivessel disease having PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized to either IRA-only PCI or complete in-hospital revascularization. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed following PPCI (median day 3) and stress CMR at 9 months. The pre-specified primary endpoint was infarct size on pre-discharge CMR. The study had 80% power to detect a 4% difference in infarct size with 100 patients per group. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients in the main trial, 205 participated in the CMR substudy, and 203 patients (98 complete revascularization and 105 IRA-only) completed the pre-discharge CMR. The groups were well-matched. Total infarct size (median, interquartile range) was similar to IRA-only revascularization: 13.5% (6.2% to 21.9%) versus complete revascularization, 12.6% (7.2% to 22.6%) of left ventricular mass, p = 0.57 (95% confidence interval for difference in geometric means 0.82 to 1.41). The complete revascularization group had an increase in non-IRA MI on the pre-discharge CMR (22 of 98 vs. 11 of 105, p = 0.02). There was no difference in total infarct size or ischemic burden between treatment groups at follow-up CMR. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel PCI in the setting of STEMI leads to a small increase in CMR-detected non-IRA MI, but total infarct size was not significantly different from an IRA-only revascularization strategy. (Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI Pilot Study [CvLPRIT]; ISRCTN70913605) Elsevier Biomedical 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4681843/ /pubmed/26700834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099 Text en © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
McCann, Gerry P.
Khan, Jamal N.
Greenwood, John P.
Nazir, Sheraz
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel J.
Ring, Arne
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Sasikaran, Thiagarajah
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
title Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
title_full Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
title_fullStr Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
title_full_unstemmed Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
title_short Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
title_sort complete versus lesion-only primary pci: the randomized cardiovascular mr cvlprit substudy
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099
work_keys_str_mv AT mccanngerryp completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT khanjamaln completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT greenwoodjohnp completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT nazirsheraz completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT dalbymiles completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT curzennick completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT hetheringtonsimon completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT kellydamianj completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT blackmandanielj completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT ringarne completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT peeblescharles completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT wongjoyce completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT sasikaranthiagarajah completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT flathermarcus completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT swantonhoward completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy
AT gershlickanthonyh completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy