Cargando…
Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy
BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes compared with an infarct-related artery (IRA)-only strategy in patients being treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) who have multivessel disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Ho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Biomedical
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099 |
_version_ | 1782405783181328384 |
---|---|
author | McCann, Gerry P. Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel J. Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. |
author_facet | McCann, Gerry P. Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel J. Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. |
author_sort | McCann, Gerry P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes compared with an infarct-related artery (IRA)-only strategy in patients being treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) who have multivessel disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is concern that non-IRA PCI may cause additional non-IRA myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether in-hospital complete revascularization was associated with increased total infarct size compared with an IRA-only strategy. METHODS: This multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial evaluated STEMI patients with multivessel disease having PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized to either IRA-only PCI or complete in-hospital revascularization. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed following PPCI (median day 3) and stress CMR at 9 months. The pre-specified primary endpoint was infarct size on pre-discharge CMR. The study had 80% power to detect a 4% difference in infarct size with 100 patients per group. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients in the main trial, 205 participated in the CMR substudy, and 203 patients (98 complete revascularization and 105 IRA-only) completed the pre-discharge CMR. The groups were well-matched. Total infarct size (median, interquartile range) was similar to IRA-only revascularization: 13.5% (6.2% to 21.9%) versus complete revascularization, 12.6% (7.2% to 22.6%) of left ventricular mass, p = 0.57 (95% confidence interval for difference in geometric means 0.82 to 1.41). The complete revascularization group had an increase in non-IRA MI on the pre-discharge CMR (22 of 98 vs. 11 of 105, p = 0.02). There was no difference in total infarct size or ischemic burden between treatment groups at follow-up CMR. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel PCI in the setting of STEMI leads to a small increase in CMR-detected non-IRA MI, but total infarct size was not significantly different from an IRA-only revascularization strategy. (Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI Pilot Study [CvLPRIT]; ISRCTN70913605) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4681843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier Biomedical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46818432016-01-11 Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy McCann, Gerry P. Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel J. Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. J Am Coll Cardiol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization may improve outcomes compared with an infarct-related artery (IRA)-only strategy in patients being treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) who have multivessel disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is concern that non-IRA PCI may cause additional non-IRA myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether in-hospital complete revascularization was associated with increased total infarct size compared with an IRA-only strategy. METHODS: This multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial evaluated STEMI patients with multivessel disease having PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized to either IRA-only PCI or complete in-hospital revascularization. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed following PPCI (median day 3) and stress CMR at 9 months. The pre-specified primary endpoint was infarct size on pre-discharge CMR. The study had 80% power to detect a 4% difference in infarct size with 100 patients per group. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients in the main trial, 205 participated in the CMR substudy, and 203 patients (98 complete revascularization and 105 IRA-only) completed the pre-discharge CMR. The groups were well-matched. Total infarct size (median, interquartile range) was similar to IRA-only revascularization: 13.5% (6.2% to 21.9%) versus complete revascularization, 12.6% (7.2% to 22.6%) of left ventricular mass, p = 0.57 (95% confidence interval for difference in geometric means 0.82 to 1.41). The complete revascularization group had an increase in non-IRA MI on the pre-discharge CMR (22 of 98 vs. 11 of 105, p = 0.02). There was no difference in total infarct size or ischemic burden between treatment groups at follow-up CMR. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel PCI in the setting of STEMI leads to a small increase in CMR-detected non-IRA MI, but total infarct size was not significantly different from an IRA-only revascularization strategy. (Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI Pilot Study [CvLPRIT]; ISRCTN70913605) Elsevier Biomedical 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4681843/ /pubmed/26700834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099 Text en © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation McCann, Gerry P. Khan, Jamal N. Greenwood, John P. Nazir, Sheraz Dalby, Miles Curzen, Nick Hetherington, Simon Kelly, Damian J. Blackman, Daniel J. Ring, Arne Peebles, Charles Wong, Joyce Sasikaran, Thiagarajah Flather, Marcus Swanton, Howard Gershlick, Anthony H. Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy |
title | Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy |
title_full | Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy |
title_fullStr | Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy |
title_full_unstemmed | Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy |
title_short | Complete Versus Lesion-Only Primary PCI: The Randomized Cardiovascular MR CvLPRIT Substudy |
title_sort | complete versus lesion-only primary pci: the randomized cardiovascular mr cvlprit substudy |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4681843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26700834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccanngerryp completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT khanjamaln completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT greenwoodjohnp completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT nazirsheraz completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT dalbymiles completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT curzennick completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT hetheringtonsimon completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT kellydamianj completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT blackmandanielj completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT ringarne completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT peeblescharles completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT wongjoyce completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT sasikaranthiagarajah completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT flathermarcus completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT swantonhoward completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy AT gershlickanthonyh completeversuslesiononlyprimarypcitherandomizedcardiovascularmrcvlpritsubstudy |