Cargando…
How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
BACKGROUND: Vital signs play a critical role in prioritizing patients in emergency departments (EDs), and are the foundation of most triage methods and disposition decisions. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of vital signs documentation anytime during emergency department treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10 |
_version_ | 1782405881668829184 |
---|---|
author | Mehmood, Amber He, Siran Zafar, Waleed Baig, Noor Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed Razzak, Juanid Abdul |
author_facet | Mehmood, Amber He, Siran Zafar, Waleed Baig, Noor Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed Razzak, Juanid Abdul |
author_sort | Mehmood, Amber |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vital signs play a critical role in prioritizing patients in emergency departments (EDs), and are the foundation of most triage methods and disposition decisions. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of vital signs documentation anytime during emergency department treatment and to explore if abnormal vital signs were associated with the likelihood of admission for a set of common presenting complaints. METHODS: Data were collected over a four-month period from the EDs of seven urban tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. The variables included age, sex, hospital type (government run vs. private), presenting complaint, ED vital signs, and final disposition. Patients who were >12 years of age were included in the analysis. The data were analyzed to describe the proportion of patients with documented vitals signs, which was then crossed-tabulated with top the ten presenting complaints to identify high-acuity patients and correlation with their admission status. RESULTS: A total of 274,436 patients were captured in the Pakistan National Emergency Department Surveillance (Pak-NEDS), out of which 259,288 patients were included in our study. Vital signs information was available for 90,569 (34.9%) patients and the most commonly recorded vitals sign was pulse (25.7%). Important information such as level of consciousness was missing in the majority of patients with head injuries. Based on available information, only 13.3% with chest pain, 12.8% with fever and 12.8% patients with diarrhea could be classified as high-acuity. In addition, hospital admission rates were two- to four-times higher among patients with abnormal vital signs, compared with those with normal vital signs. CONCLUSION: Most patients seen in the EDs in Pakistan did not have any documented vital signs during their visit. Where available, the presence of abnormal vital signs were associated with higher chances of admission to the hospital for the most common presenting symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4682394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46823942015-12-21 How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan Mehmood, Amber He, Siran Zafar, Waleed Baig, Noor Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed Razzak, Juanid Abdul BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: Vital signs play a critical role in prioritizing patients in emergency departments (EDs), and are the foundation of most triage methods and disposition decisions. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of vital signs documentation anytime during emergency department treatment and to explore if abnormal vital signs were associated with the likelihood of admission for a set of common presenting complaints. METHODS: Data were collected over a four-month period from the EDs of seven urban tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. The variables included age, sex, hospital type (government run vs. private), presenting complaint, ED vital signs, and final disposition. Patients who were >12 years of age were included in the analysis. The data were analyzed to describe the proportion of patients with documented vitals signs, which was then crossed-tabulated with top the ten presenting complaints to identify high-acuity patients and correlation with their admission status. RESULTS: A total of 274,436 patients were captured in the Pakistan National Emergency Department Surveillance (Pak-NEDS), out of which 259,288 patients were included in our study. Vital signs information was available for 90,569 (34.9%) patients and the most commonly recorded vitals sign was pulse (25.7%). Important information such as level of consciousness was missing in the majority of patients with head injuries. Based on available information, only 13.3% with chest pain, 12.8% with fever and 12.8% patients with diarrhea could be classified as high-acuity. In addition, hospital admission rates were two- to four-times higher among patients with abnormal vital signs, compared with those with normal vital signs. CONCLUSION: Most patients seen in the EDs in Pakistan did not have any documented vital signs during their visit. Where available, the presence of abnormal vital signs were associated with higher chances of admission to the hospital for the most common presenting symptoms. BioMed Central 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4682394/ /pubmed/26690816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10 Text en Copyright © 2015 Mehmood et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mehmood, Amber He, Siran Zafar, Waleed Baig, Noor Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed Razzak, Juanid Abdul How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan |
title | How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan |
title_full | How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan |
title_fullStr | How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan |
title_full_unstemmed | How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan |
title_short | How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan |
title_sort | how vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of pakistan |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehmoodamber howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan AT hesiran howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan AT zafarwaleed howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan AT baignoor howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan AT sumalanifareedahmed howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan AT razzakjuanidabdul howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan |