Cargando…

How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan

BACKGROUND: Vital signs play a critical role in prioritizing patients in emergency departments (EDs), and are the foundation of most triage methods and disposition decisions. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of vital signs documentation anytime during emergency department treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehmood, Amber, He, Siran, Zafar, Waleed, Baig, Noor, Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed, Razzak, Juanid Abdul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10
_version_ 1782405881668829184
author Mehmood, Amber
He, Siran
Zafar, Waleed
Baig, Noor
Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed
Razzak, Juanid Abdul
author_facet Mehmood, Amber
He, Siran
Zafar, Waleed
Baig, Noor
Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed
Razzak, Juanid Abdul
author_sort Mehmood, Amber
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vital signs play a critical role in prioritizing patients in emergency departments (EDs), and are the foundation of most triage methods and disposition decisions. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of vital signs documentation anytime during emergency department treatment and to explore if abnormal vital signs were associated with the likelihood of admission for a set of common presenting complaints. METHODS: Data were collected over a four-month period from the EDs of seven urban tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. The variables included age, sex, hospital type (government run vs. private), presenting complaint, ED vital signs, and final disposition. Patients who were >12 years of age were included in the analysis. The data were analyzed to describe the proportion of patients with documented vitals signs, which was then crossed-tabulated with top the ten presenting complaints to identify high-acuity patients and correlation with their admission status. RESULTS: A total of 274,436 patients were captured in the Pakistan National Emergency Department Surveillance (Pak-NEDS), out of which 259,288 patients were included in our study. Vital signs information was available for 90,569 (34.9%) patients and the most commonly recorded vitals sign was pulse (25.7%). Important information such as level of consciousness was missing in the majority of patients with head injuries. Based on available information, only 13.3% with chest pain, 12.8% with fever and 12.8% patients with diarrhea could be classified as high-acuity. In addition, hospital admission rates were two- to four-times higher among patients with abnormal vital signs, compared with those with normal vital signs. CONCLUSION: Most patients seen in the EDs in Pakistan did not have any documented vital signs during their visit. Where available, the presence of abnormal vital signs were associated with higher chances of admission to the hospital for the most common presenting symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4682394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46823942015-12-21 How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan Mehmood, Amber He, Siran Zafar, Waleed Baig, Noor Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed Razzak, Juanid Abdul BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: Vital signs play a critical role in prioritizing patients in emergency departments (EDs), and are the foundation of most triage methods and disposition decisions. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of vital signs documentation anytime during emergency department treatment and to explore if abnormal vital signs were associated with the likelihood of admission for a set of common presenting complaints. METHODS: Data were collected over a four-month period from the EDs of seven urban tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. The variables included age, sex, hospital type (government run vs. private), presenting complaint, ED vital signs, and final disposition. Patients who were >12 years of age were included in the analysis. The data were analyzed to describe the proportion of patients with documented vitals signs, which was then crossed-tabulated with top the ten presenting complaints to identify high-acuity patients and correlation with their admission status. RESULTS: A total of 274,436 patients were captured in the Pakistan National Emergency Department Surveillance (Pak-NEDS), out of which 259,288 patients were included in our study. Vital signs information was available for 90,569 (34.9%) patients and the most commonly recorded vitals sign was pulse (25.7%). Important information such as level of consciousness was missing in the majority of patients with head injuries. Based on available information, only 13.3% with chest pain, 12.8% with fever and 12.8% patients with diarrhea could be classified as high-acuity. In addition, hospital admission rates were two- to four-times higher among patients with abnormal vital signs, compared with those with normal vital signs. CONCLUSION: Most patients seen in the EDs in Pakistan did not have any documented vital signs during their visit. Where available, the presence of abnormal vital signs were associated with higher chances of admission to the hospital for the most common presenting symptoms. BioMed Central 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4682394/ /pubmed/26690816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10 Text en Copyright © 2015 Mehmood et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mehmood, Amber
He, Siran
Zafar, Waleed
Baig, Noor
Sumalani, Fareed Ahmed
Razzak, Juanid Abdul
How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
title How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
title_full How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
title_fullStr How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
title_full_unstemmed How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
title_short How vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of Pakistan
title_sort how vital are the vital signs? a multi-center observational study from emergency departments of pakistan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-15-S2-S10
work_keys_str_mv AT mehmoodamber howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan
AT hesiran howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan
AT zafarwaleed howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan
AT baignoor howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan
AT sumalanifareedahmed howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan
AT razzakjuanidabdul howvitalarethevitalsignsamulticenterobservationalstudyfromemergencydepartmentsofpakistan