Cargando…
Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Recently, using the patient’s genotype to guide warfarin dosing has gained interest; however, whether pharmacogenetics-based dosing (PD) improves clinical outcomes compared to conventional dosing (CD) remains unclear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate these two strategies. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26672604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144511 |
_version_ | 1782405917813243904 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Changcheng Yan, Wei Wang, Gang Wang, Fei Li, Qingyu Lin, Nengming |
author_facet | Shi, Changcheng Yan, Wei Wang, Gang Wang, Fei Li, Qingyu Lin, Nengming |
author_sort | Shi, Changcheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, using the patient’s genotype to guide warfarin dosing has gained interest; however, whether pharmacogenetics-based dosing (PD) improves clinical outcomes compared to conventional dosing (CD) remains unclear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate these two strategies. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese VIP and Chinese Wan-fang databases were searched. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was time within the therapeutic range (TTR); the secondary end points were the time to maintenance dose and time to first therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR), an INR greater than 4, adverse events, major bleeding, thromboembolism and death from any cause. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials involving 2,678 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that PD did not improve the TTR compared to CD, although PD significantly shortened the time to maintenance dose (MD = -8.80; 95% CI: -11.99 to -5.60; P<0.00001) and the time to first therapeutic INR (MD = -2.80; 95% CI: -3.45 to -2.15; P<0.00001). Additionally, PD significantly reduced the risk of adverse events (RR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.03) and major bleeding (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.89, P = 0.03), although it did not reduce the percentage of INR greater than 4, the risk of thromboembolic events and death from any cause. Subgroup analysis showed that PD resulted in a better improvement in the endpoints of TTR and over-anticoagulation at a fixed initial dosage rather than a non-fixed initial dosage. CONCLUSIONS: The use of genotype testing in the management of warfarin anticoagulation was associated with significant improvements in INR-related and clinical outcomes. Thus, genotype-based regimens can be considered a reliable and accurate method to determine warfarin dosing and may be preferred over fixed-dose regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: Database registration: CRD42015024127. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4682655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46826552015-12-31 Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Shi, Changcheng Yan, Wei Wang, Gang Wang, Fei Li, Qingyu Lin, Nengming PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recently, using the patient’s genotype to guide warfarin dosing has gained interest; however, whether pharmacogenetics-based dosing (PD) improves clinical outcomes compared to conventional dosing (CD) remains unclear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate these two strategies. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese VIP and Chinese Wan-fang databases were searched. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was time within the therapeutic range (TTR); the secondary end points were the time to maintenance dose and time to first therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR), an INR greater than 4, adverse events, major bleeding, thromboembolism and death from any cause. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials involving 2,678 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that PD did not improve the TTR compared to CD, although PD significantly shortened the time to maintenance dose (MD = -8.80; 95% CI: -11.99 to -5.60; P<0.00001) and the time to first therapeutic INR (MD = -2.80; 95% CI: -3.45 to -2.15; P<0.00001). Additionally, PD significantly reduced the risk of adverse events (RR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.03) and major bleeding (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.89, P = 0.03), although it did not reduce the percentage of INR greater than 4, the risk of thromboembolic events and death from any cause. Subgroup analysis showed that PD resulted in a better improvement in the endpoints of TTR and over-anticoagulation at a fixed initial dosage rather than a non-fixed initial dosage. CONCLUSIONS: The use of genotype testing in the management of warfarin anticoagulation was associated with significant improvements in INR-related and clinical outcomes. Thus, genotype-based regimens can be considered a reliable and accurate method to determine warfarin dosing and may be preferred over fixed-dose regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: Database registration: CRD42015024127. Public Library of Science 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4682655/ /pubmed/26672604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144511 Text en © 2015 Shi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shi, Changcheng Yan, Wei Wang, Gang Wang, Fei Li, Qingyu Lin, Nengming Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Pharmacogenetics-Based versus Conventional Dosing of Warfarin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | pharmacogenetics-based versus conventional dosing of warfarin: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4682655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26672604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shichangcheng pharmacogeneticsbasedversusconventionaldosingofwarfarinametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yanwei pharmacogeneticsbasedversusconventionaldosingofwarfarinametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wanggang pharmacogeneticsbasedversusconventionaldosingofwarfarinametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangfei pharmacogeneticsbasedversusconventionaldosingofwarfarinametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liqingyu pharmacogeneticsbasedversusconventionaldosingofwarfarinametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT linnengming pharmacogeneticsbasedversusconventionaldosingofwarfarinametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |