Cargando…

Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A sustained and effective oropharyngeal sealing with supraglottic airway (SGA) is required to maintain the ventilation during laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the Trendelenburg position. This study was conducted with I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™, two prototype SGA devices with a gastric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Sandeep Kumar, Sivaraman, B., Balachander, Hemavathy, Naggappa, Mahesh, Parida, Satyen, Bhat, Ravindra R., Yuvaraj, Kotteeswaran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712973
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.159771
_version_ 1782406030926282752
author Mishra, Sandeep Kumar
Sivaraman, B.
Balachander, Hemavathy
Naggappa, Mahesh
Parida, Satyen
Bhat, Ravindra R.
Yuvaraj, Kotteeswaran
author_facet Mishra, Sandeep Kumar
Sivaraman, B.
Balachander, Hemavathy
Naggappa, Mahesh
Parida, Satyen
Bhat, Ravindra R.
Yuvaraj, Kotteeswaran
author_sort Mishra, Sandeep Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A sustained and effective oropharyngeal sealing with supraglottic airway (SGA) is required to maintain the ventilation during laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the Trendelenburg position. This study was conducted with I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™, two prototype SGA devices with a gastric access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients and randomized to either I-gel or ProSeal LMA (PLMA) group. After induction of anesthesia using a standardized protocol, one of the SGA devices was inserted. The primary objective of this study was to compare the oropharyngeal leak (sealing) pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position. The secondary objectives were to compare ease of insertion, cuff position as assessed by the fiberoptic view of the glottis, adequacy of ventilation and incidence of complication. RESULTS: The baseline (before pneumoperitoneum) oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel was less than the PLMA (mean (standard deviation [SD]) 24 (4) vs. 29 (4) cmH(2)O, respectively; P < 0.001). After pneumoperitoneum, the leak airway pressure in I-gel group was significantly less than that of PLMA group (mean [SD] 27 (3) vs. 34.0 (4) cmH(2)O, respectively; P < 0.001). Peak airway pressure was increased after pneumoperitoneum compared to baseline in both the groups. However, end-tidal carbon dioxide was maintained within normal limits. The insertion parameters, fiberoptic view of the glottis, fiberoptic view of the drain tube, and complications were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both I-gel and PLMA are effective for ventilation in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. However, PLMA provides better sealing as compared to I-gel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4683478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46834782015-12-28 Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial Mishra, Sandeep Kumar Sivaraman, B. Balachander, Hemavathy Naggappa, Mahesh Parida, Satyen Bhat, Ravindra R. Yuvaraj, Kotteeswaran Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: A sustained and effective oropharyngeal sealing with supraglottic airway (SGA) is required to maintain the ventilation during laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the Trendelenburg position. This study was conducted with I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™, two prototype SGA devices with a gastric access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients and randomized to either I-gel or ProSeal LMA (PLMA) group. After induction of anesthesia using a standardized protocol, one of the SGA devices was inserted. The primary objective of this study was to compare the oropharyngeal leak (sealing) pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ after pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position. The secondary objectives were to compare ease of insertion, cuff position as assessed by the fiberoptic view of the glottis, adequacy of ventilation and incidence of complication. RESULTS: The baseline (before pneumoperitoneum) oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel was less than the PLMA (mean (standard deviation [SD]) 24 (4) vs. 29 (4) cmH(2)O, respectively; P < 0.001). After pneumoperitoneum, the leak airway pressure in I-gel group was significantly less than that of PLMA group (mean [SD] 27 (3) vs. 34.0 (4) cmH(2)O, respectively; P < 0.001). Peak airway pressure was increased after pneumoperitoneum compared to baseline in both the groups. However, end-tidal carbon dioxide was maintained within normal limits. The insertion parameters, fiberoptic view of the glottis, fiberoptic view of the drain tube, and complications were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both I-gel and PLMA are effective for ventilation in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. However, PLMA provides better sealing as compared to I-gel. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4683478/ /pubmed/26712973 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.159771 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mishra, Sandeep Kumar
Sivaraman, B.
Balachander, Hemavathy
Naggappa, Mahesh
Parida, Satyen
Bhat, Ravindra R.
Yuvaraj, Kotteeswaran
Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of pneumoperitoneum and trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of i-gel™ and proseal lma™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712973
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.159771
work_keys_str_mv AT mishrasandeepkumar effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sivaramanb effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT balachanderhemavathy effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT naggappamahesh effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paridasatyen effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bhatravindrar effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuvarajkotteeswaran effectofpneumoperitoneumandtrendelenbergpositiononoropharyngealsealingpressureofigelandproseallmainlaparoscopicgynecologicalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial