Cargando…
Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
BACKGROUND: To augment the subarachnoid block utility, the efficacy of newer molecules as an adjuvant is investigated constantly. Considering the favorable profile of dexmedetomidine, it could have a potential role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.158009 |
_version_ | 1782406031156969472 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Jain, Gaurav Verma, Ravi Kumar |
author_facet | Singh, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Jain, Gaurav Verma, Ravi Kumar |
author_sort | Singh, Atul Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To augment the subarachnoid block utility, the efficacy of newer molecules as an adjuvant is investigated constantly. Considering the favorable profile of dexmedetomidine, it could have a potential role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to isobaric ropivacaine, intrathecally. METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive 2.5 ml of isobaric ropivacaine (0.75%, 7.5 mg/ml) added to 5 µg (10 µg/ml) or 10 µg (20 µg/ml) of dexmedetomidine or 0.5 ml of normal saline in group A, B or C, respectively. Block characteristics were compared as a primary outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance test, Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test, whichever appropriate. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Time to achieve desired block was least in group B and maximum in group C. The sensory-motor blockade remained significantly prolonged in group B compared to other groups. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Among the investigated doses, dexmedetomidine augments the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine in a dose-dependent manner, without any untoward side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4683479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46834792015-12-28 Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery Singh, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Jain, Gaurav Verma, Ravi Kumar Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To augment the subarachnoid block utility, the efficacy of newer molecules as an adjuvant is investigated constantly. Considering the favorable profile of dexmedetomidine, it could have a potential role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to isobaric ropivacaine, intrathecally. METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive 2.5 ml of isobaric ropivacaine (0.75%, 7.5 mg/ml) added to 5 µg (10 µg/ml) or 10 µg (20 µg/ml) of dexmedetomidine or 0.5 ml of normal saline in group A, B or C, respectively. Block characteristics were compared as a primary outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance test, Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test, whichever appropriate. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Time to achieve desired block was least in group B and maximum in group C. The sensory-motor blockade remained significantly prolonged in group B compared to other groups. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Among the investigated doses, dexmedetomidine augments the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine in a dose-dependent manner, without any untoward side effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4683479/ /pubmed/26712971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.158009 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Jain, Gaurav Verma, Ravi Kumar Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
title | Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
title_full | Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
title_short | Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
title_sort | comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.158009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhatulkumar comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery AT singhyashpal comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery AT jaingaurav comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery AT vermaravikumar comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery |