Cargando…

Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND: To augment the subarachnoid block utility, the efficacy of newer molecules as an adjuvant is investigated constantly. Considering the favorable profile of dexmedetomidine, it could have a potential role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Atul Kumar, Singh, Yashpal, Jain, Gaurav, Verma, Ravi Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.158009
_version_ 1782406031156969472
author Singh, Atul Kumar
Singh, Yashpal
Jain, Gaurav
Verma, Ravi Kumar
author_facet Singh, Atul Kumar
Singh, Yashpal
Jain, Gaurav
Verma, Ravi Kumar
author_sort Singh, Atul Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To augment the subarachnoid block utility, the efficacy of newer molecules as an adjuvant is investigated constantly. Considering the favorable profile of dexmedetomidine, it could have a potential role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to isobaric ropivacaine, intrathecally. METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive 2.5 ml of isobaric ropivacaine (0.75%, 7.5 mg/ml) added to 5 µg (10 µg/ml) or 10 µg (20 µg/ml) of dexmedetomidine or 0.5 ml of normal saline in group A, B or C, respectively. Block characteristics were compared as a primary outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance test, Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test, whichever appropriate. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Time to achieve desired block was least in group B and maximum in group C. The sensory-motor blockade remained significantly prolonged in group B compared to other groups. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Among the investigated doses, dexmedetomidine augments the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine in a dose-dependent manner, without any untoward side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4683479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46834792015-12-28 Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery Singh, Atul Kumar Singh, Yashpal Jain, Gaurav Verma, Ravi Kumar Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To augment the subarachnoid block utility, the efficacy of newer molecules as an adjuvant is investigated constantly. Considering the favorable profile of dexmedetomidine, it could have a potential role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine. AIM: We evaluated the efficacy of two different doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to isobaric ropivacaine, intrathecally. METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive 2.5 ml of isobaric ropivacaine (0.75%, 7.5 mg/ml) added to 5 µg (10 µg/ml) or 10 µg (20 µg/ml) of dexmedetomidine or 0.5 ml of normal saline in group A, B or C, respectively. Block characteristics were compared as a primary outcome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way analysis of variance test, Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test, whichever appropriate. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Time to achieve desired block was least in group B and maximum in group C. The sensory-motor blockade remained significantly prolonged in group B compared to other groups. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Among the investigated doses, dexmedetomidine augments the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine in a dose-dependent manner, without any untoward side effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4683479/ /pubmed/26712971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.158009 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Atul Kumar
Singh, Yashpal
Jain, Gaurav
Verma, Ravi Kumar
Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
title Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
title_full Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
title_short Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
title_sort comparison of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as adjuvant with isobaric ropivacaine in lower abdominal surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.158009
work_keys_str_mv AT singhatulkumar comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery
AT singhyashpal comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery
AT jaingaurav comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery
AT vermaravikumar comparisonoftwodifferentdosesofintrathecaldexmedetomidineasadjuvantwithisobaricropivacaineinlowerabdominalsurgery