Cargando…

Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data

Traditionally, exploration of genetic variance in humans, plants, and livestock species has been limited mostly to the use of additive effects estimated using pedigree data. However, with the development of dense panels of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the exploration of genetic variation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lopes, Marcos S., Bastiaansen, John W. M., Janss, Luc, Knol, Egbert F., Bovenhuis, Henk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.019513
_version_ 1782406056015560704
author Lopes, Marcos S.
Bastiaansen, John W. M.
Janss, Luc
Knol, Egbert F.
Bovenhuis, Henk
author_facet Lopes, Marcos S.
Bastiaansen, John W. M.
Janss, Luc
Knol, Egbert F.
Bovenhuis, Henk
author_sort Lopes, Marcos S.
collection PubMed
description Traditionally, exploration of genetic variance in humans, plants, and livestock species has been limited mostly to the use of additive effects estimated using pedigree data. However, with the development of dense panels of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the exploration of genetic variation of complex traits is moving from quantifying the resemblance between family members to the dissection of genetic variation at individual loci. With SNPs, we were able to quantify the contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting variance to the total genetic variance by using a SNP regression method. The method was validated in simulated data and applied to three traits (number of teats, backfat, and lifetime daily gain) in three purebred pig populations. In simulated data, the estimates of additive, dominance, and imprinting variance were very close to the simulated values. In real data, dominance effects account for a substantial proportion of the total genetic variance (up to 44%) for these traits in these populations. The contribution of imprinting to the total phenotypic variance of the evaluated traits was relatively small (1–3%). Our results indicate a strong relationship between additive variance explained per chromosome and chromosome length, which has been described previously for other traits in other species. We also show that a similar linear relationship exists for dominance and imprinting variance. These novel results improve our understanding of the genetic architecture of the evaluated traits and shows promise to apply the SNP regression method to other traits and species, including human diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4683636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46836362015-12-18 Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data Lopes, Marcos S. Bastiaansen, John W. M. Janss, Luc Knol, Egbert F. Bovenhuis, Henk G3 (Bethesda) Genomic Selection Traditionally, exploration of genetic variance in humans, plants, and livestock species has been limited mostly to the use of additive effects estimated using pedigree data. However, with the development of dense panels of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the exploration of genetic variation of complex traits is moving from quantifying the resemblance between family members to the dissection of genetic variation at individual loci. With SNPs, we were able to quantify the contribution of additive, dominance, and imprinting variance to the total genetic variance by using a SNP regression method. The method was validated in simulated data and applied to three traits (number of teats, backfat, and lifetime daily gain) in three purebred pig populations. In simulated data, the estimates of additive, dominance, and imprinting variance were very close to the simulated values. In real data, dominance effects account for a substantial proportion of the total genetic variance (up to 44%) for these traits in these populations. The contribution of imprinting to the total phenotypic variance of the evaluated traits was relatively small (1–3%). Our results indicate a strong relationship between additive variance explained per chromosome and chromosome length, which has been described previously for other traits in other species. We also show that a similar linear relationship exists for dominance and imprinting variance. These novel results improve our understanding of the genetic architecture of the evaluated traits and shows promise to apply the SNP regression method to other traits and species, including human diseases. Genetics Society of America 2015-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4683636/ /pubmed/26438289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.019513 Text en Copyright © 2015 Lopes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genomic Selection
Lopes, Marcos S.
Bastiaansen, John W. M.
Janss, Luc
Knol, Egbert F.
Bovenhuis, Henk
Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data
title Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data
title_full Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data
title_fullStr Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data
title_short Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data
title_sort estimation of additive, dominance, and imprinting genetic variance using genomic data
topic Genomic Selection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26438289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.019513
work_keys_str_mv AT lopesmarcoss estimationofadditivedominanceandimprintinggeneticvarianceusinggenomicdata
AT bastiaansenjohnwm estimationofadditivedominanceandimprintinggeneticvarianceusinggenomicdata
AT janssluc estimationofadditivedominanceandimprintinggeneticvarianceusinggenomicdata
AT knolegbertf estimationofadditivedominanceandimprintinggeneticvarianceusinggenomicdata
AT bovenhuishenk estimationofadditivedominanceandimprintinggeneticvarianceusinggenomicdata