Cargando…

The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma

BACKGROUND: Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emerge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walenkamp, Monique M. J., Bentohami, Abdelali, Slaar, Annelie, Beerekamp, M. Suzan H., Maas, Mario, Jager, L. Cara, Sosef, Nico L., van Velde, Romuald, Ultee, Jan M., Steyerberg, Ewout W., Goslings, J. Carel, Schep, Niels W. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26682537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2
_version_ 1782406065729568768
author Walenkamp, Monique M. J.
Bentohami, Abdelali
Slaar, Annelie
Beerekamp, M. Suzan H.
Maas, Mario
Jager, L. Cara
Sosef, Nico L.
van Velde, Romuald
Ultee, Jan M.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Goslings, J. Carel
Schep, Niels W. L.
author_facet Walenkamp, Monique M. J.
Bentohami, Abdelali
Slaar, Annelie
Beerekamp, M. Suzan H.
Maas, Mario
Jager, L. Cara
Sosef, Nico L.
van Velde, Romuald
Ultee, Jan M.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Goslings, J. Carel
Schep, Niels W. L.
author_sort Walenkamp, Monique M. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emergency Department (ED) for radiography. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting wrist fractures in patients following wrist trauma; (2) external validation of this model; and (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The study was conducted in the EDs of five Dutch hospitals: one academic hospital (derivation cohort) and four regional hospitals (external validation cohort). We included all adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The main outcome was fracture of the wrist (distal radius, distal ulna or carpal bones) diagnosed on conventional X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 882 patients were analyzed; 487 in the derivation cohort and 395 in the validation cohort. We derived a clinical prediction model with eight variables: age; sex, swelling of the wrist; swelling of the anatomical snuffbox, visible deformation; distal radius tender to palpation; pain on radial deviation and painful axial compression of the thumb. The Area Under the Curve at external validation of this model was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77–0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) in the external validation cohort were 98 % (95 % CI: 95–99 %) and 21 % (95 % CI: 15 %–28). The negative predictive value was 90 % (95 % CI: 81–99 %). CONCLUSIONS: The Amsterdam Wrist Rules is a clinical prediction rule with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for fractures of the wrist. Although external validation showed low specificity and 100 % sensitivity could not be achieved, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules can provide physicians in the Emergency Department with a useful screening tool to select patients with acute wrist trauma for radiography. The upcoming implementation study will further reveal the impact of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules on the anticipated reduction of X-rays requested, missed fractures, Emergency Department waiting times and health care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry, reference number NTR2544 on October 1(st), 2010. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4683697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46836972015-12-19 The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma Walenkamp, Monique M. J. Bentohami, Abdelali Slaar, Annelie Beerekamp, M. Suzan H. Maas, Mario Jager, L. Cara Sosef, Nico L. van Velde, Romuald Ultee, Jan M. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Goslings, J. Carel Schep, Niels W. L. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emergency Department (ED) for radiography. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting wrist fractures in patients following wrist trauma; (2) external validation of this model; and (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The study was conducted in the EDs of five Dutch hospitals: one academic hospital (derivation cohort) and four regional hospitals (external validation cohort). We included all adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The main outcome was fracture of the wrist (distal radius, distal ulna or carpal bones) diagnosed on conventional X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 882 patients were analyzed; 487 in the derivation cohort and 395 in the validation cohort. We derived a clinical prediction model with eight variables: age; sex, swelling of the wrist; swelling of the anatomical snuffbox, visible deformation; distal radius tender to palpation; pain on radial deviation and painful axial compression of the thumb. The Area Under the Curve at external validation of this model was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77–0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) in the external validation cohort were 98 % (95 % CI: 95–99 %) and 21 % (95 % CI: 15 %–28). The negative predictive value was 90 % (95 % CI: 81–99 %). CONCLUSIONS: The Amsterdam Wrist Rules is a clinical prediction rule with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for fractures of the wrist. Although external validation showed low specificity and 100 % sensitivity could not be achieved, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules can provide physicians in the Emergency Department with a useful screening tool to select patients with acute wrist trauma for radiography. The upcoming implementation study will further reveal the impact of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules on the anticipated reduction of X-rays requested, missed fractures, Emergency Department waiting times and health care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry, reference number NTR2544 on October 1(st), 2010. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4683697/ /pubmed/26682537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2 Text en © Walenkamp et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walenkamp, Monique M. J.
Bentohami, Abdelali
Slaar, Annelie
Beerekamp, M. Suzan H.
Maas, Mario
Jager, L. Cara
Sosef, Nico L.
van Velde, Romuald
Ultee, Jan M.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Goslings, J. Carel
Schep, Niels W. L.
The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
title The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
title_full The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
title_fullStr The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
title_full_unstemmed The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
title_short The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
title_sort amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26682537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2
work_keys_str_mv AT walenkampmoniquemj theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT bentohamiabdelali theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT slaarannelie theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT beerekampmsuzanh theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT maasmario theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT jagerlcara theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT sosefnicol theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT vanvelderomuald theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT ulteejanm theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT steyerbergewoutw theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT goslingsjcarel theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT schepnielswl theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT walenkampmoniquemj amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT bentohamiabdelali amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT slaarannelie amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT beerekampmsuzanh amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT maasmario amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT jagerlcara amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT sosefnicol amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT vanvelderomuald amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT ulteejanm amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT steyerbergewoutw amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT goslingsjcarel amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma
AT schepnielswl amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma