Cargando…
The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
BACKGROUND: Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emerge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26682537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2 |
_version_ | 1782406065729568768 |
---|---|
author | Walenkamp, Monique M. J. Bentohami, Abdelali Slaar, Annelie Beerekamp, M. Suzan H. Maas, Mario Jager, L. Cara Sosef, Nico L. van Velde, Romuald Ultee, Jan M. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Goslings, J. Carel Schep, Niels W. L. |
author_facet | Walenkamp, Monique M. J. Bentohami, Abdelali Slaar, Annelie Beerekamp, M. Suzan H. Maas, Mario Jager, L. Cara Sosef, Nico L. van Velde, Romuald Ultee, Jan M. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Goslings, J. Carel Schep, Niels W. L. |
author_sort | Walenkamp, Monique M. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emergency Department (ED) for radiography. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting wrist fractures in patients following wrist trauma; (2) external validation of this model; and (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The study was conducted in the EDs of five Dutch hospitals: one academic hospital (derivation cohort) and four regional hospitals (external validation cohort). We included all adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The main outcome was fracture of the wrist (distal radius, distal ulna or carpal bones) diagnosed on conventional X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 882 patients were analyzed; 487 in the derivation cohort and 395 in the validation cohort. We derived a clinical prediction model with eight variables: age; sex, swelling of the wrist; swelling of the anatomical snuffbox, visible deformation; distal radius tender to palpation; pain on radial deviation and painful axial compression of the thumb. The Area Under the Curve at external validation of this model was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77–0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) in the external validation cohort were 98 % (95 % CI: 95–99 %) and 21 % (95 % CI: 15 %–28). The negative predictive value was 90 % (95 % CI: 81–99 %). CONCLUSIONS: The Amsterdam Wrist Rules is a clinical prediction rule with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for fractures of the wrist. Although external validation showed low specificity and 100 % sensitivity could not be achieved, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules can provide physicians in the Emergency Department with a useful screening tool to select patients with acute wrist trauma for radiography. The upcoming implementation study will further reveal the impact of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules on the anticipated reduction of X-rays requested, missed fractures, Emergency Department waiting times and health care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry, reference number NTR2544 on October 1(st), 2010. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4683697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46836972015-12-19 The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma Walenkamp, Monique M. J. Bentohami, Abdelali Slaar, Annelie Beerekamp, M. Suzan H. Maas, Mario Jager, L. Cara Sosef, Nico L. van Velde, Romuald Ultee, Jan M. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Goslings, J. Carel Schep, Niels W. L. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emergency Department (ED) for radiography. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting wrist fractures in patients following wrist trauma; (2) external validation of this model; and (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The study was conducted in the EDs of five Dutch hospitals: one academic hospital (derivation cohort) and four regional hospitals (external validation cohort). We included all adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The main outcome was fracture of the wrist (distal radius, distal ulna or carpal bones) diagnosed on conventional X-rays. RESULTS: A total of 882 patients were analyzed; 487 in the derivation cohort and 395 in the validation cohort. We derived a clinical prediction model with eight variables: age; sex, swelling of the wrist; swelling of the anatomical snuffbox, visible deformation; distal radius tender to palpation; pain on radial deviation and painful axial compression of the thumb. The Area Under the Curve at external validation of this model was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77–0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) in the external validation cohort were 98 % (95 % CI: 95–99 %) and 21 % (95 % CI: 15 %–28). The negative predictive value was 90 % (95 % CI: 81–99 %). CONCLUSIONS: The Amsterdam Wrist Rules is a clinical prediction rule with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for fractures of the wrist. Although external validation showed low specificity and 100 % sensitivity could not be achieved, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules can provide physicians in the Emergency Department with a useful screening tool to select patients with acute wrist trauma for radiography. The upcoming implementation study will further reveal the impact of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules on the anticipated reduction of X-rays requested, missed fractures, Emergency Department waiting times and health care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry, reference number NTR2544 on October 1(st), 2010. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4683697/ /pubmed/26682537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2 Text en © Walenkamp et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Walenkamp, Monique M. J. Bentohami, Abdelali Slaar, Annelie Beerekamp, M. Suzan H. Maas, Mario Jager, L. Cara Sosef, Nico L. van Velde, Romuald Ultee, Jan M. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Goslings, J. Carel Schep, Niels W. L. The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
title | The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
title_full | The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
title_fullStr | The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
title_full_unstemmed | The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
title_short | The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
title_sort | amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26682537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walenkampmoniquemj theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT bentohamiabdelali theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT slaarannelie theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT beerekampmsuzanh theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT maasmario theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT jagerlcara theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT sosefnicol theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT vanvelderomuald theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT ulteejanm theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT steyerbergewoutw theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT goslingsjcarel theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT schepnielswl theamsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT walenkampmoniquemj amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT bentohamiabdelali amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT slaarannelie amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT beerekampmsuzanh amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT maasmario amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT jagerlcara amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT sosefnicol amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT vanvelderomuald amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT ulteejanm amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT steyerbergewoutw amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT goslingsjcarel amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma AT schepnielswl amsterdamwristrulesthemulticenterprospectivederivationandexternalvalidationofaclinicaldecisionrulefortheuseofradiographyinacutewristtrauma |