Cargando…

Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare condition, with poor prognosis and a mortality rate of up to 75%. Indications for surgical and non-surgical management of HPVG including associated complications and mortality remain to be clarified. METHODS: From January 2008 to December...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Soo-Kyung, Park, Jong-Hoon, Kwon, Sang Hwy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26693238
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.4.181
_version_ 1782406114737913856
author Yoo, Soo-Kyung
Park, Jong-Hoon
Kwon, Sang Hwy
author_facet Yoo, Soo-Kyung
Park, Jong-Hoon
Kwon, Sang Hwy
author_sort Yoo, Soo-Kyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare condition, with poor prognosis and a mortality rate of up to 75%. Indications for surgical and non-surgical management of HPVG including associated complications and mortality remain to be clarified. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2014, 18 patients with HPVG diagnosed through abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging were retrospectively identified. Clinical symptoms, laboratory data, underlying diseases, treatment, and mortality rate were analyzed. Patients were classified into 2 groups: surgical management recommended (SR, n=10) and conservative management (CM, n=8). The SR group was further subdivided into patients who underwent surgical management (SM-SR, n=5) and those who were managed conservatively (NS-SR, n=5). RESULTS: Conditions underlying HPVG included mesenteric ischemia (38.9%), intestinal obstruction (22.2%), enteritis (22.2%), duodenal ulcer perforation (5.6%), necrotizing pancreatitis (5.6%), and diverticulitis (5.6%). In terms of mortality, 2 patients (40%) died in the SM-SR group, 1 (12.5%) in the CM group, and 100% in the NS-SR group. Higher scores from Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II predicted the mortality rates of the NS-SR and CM groups. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of HPVG requires careful consideration for surgical management. If surgical management is indicated, prompt laparotomy should be performed. However, even in the non-surgical management condition, aggressive laparotomy can improve survival rates for patients with high APACHE II scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4683923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46839232015-12-21 Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas Yoo, Soo-Kyung Park, Jong-Hoon Kwon, Sang Hwy Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg Original Article BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is a rare condition, with poor prognosis and a mortality rate of up to 75%. Indications for surgical and non-surgical management of HPVG including associated complications and mortality remain to be clarified. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2014, 18 patients with HPVG diagnosed through abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging were retrospectively identified. Clinical symptoms, laboratory data, underlying diseases, treatment, and mortality rate were analyzed. Patients were classified into 2 groups: surgical management recommended (SR, n=10) and conservative management (CM, n=8). The SR group was further subdivided into patients who underwent surgical management (SM-SR, n=5) and those who were managed conservatively (NS-SR, n=5). RESULTS: Conditions underlying HPVG included mesenteric ischemia (38.9%), intestinal obstruction (22.2%), enteritis (22.2%), duodenal ulcer perforation (5.6%), necrotizing pancreatitis (5.6%), and diverticulitis (5.6%). In terms of mortality, 2 patients (40%) died in the SM-SR group, 1 (12.5%) in the CM group, and 100% in the NS-SR group. Higher scores from Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II predicted the mortality rates of the NS-SR and CM groups. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of HPVG requires careful consideration for surgical management. If surgical management is indicated, prompt laparotomy should be performed. However, even in the non-surgical management condition, aggressive laparotomy can improve survival rates for patients with high APACHE II scores. Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2015-11 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4683923/ /pubmed/26693238 http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.4.181 Text en Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoo, Soo-Kyung
Park, Jong-Hoon
Kwon, Sang Hwy
Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
title Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
title_full Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
title_short Clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
title_sort clinical outcomes in surgical and non-surgical management of hepatic portal venous gas
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26693238
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.4.181
work_keys_str_mv AT yoosookyung clinicaloutcomesinsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementofhepaticportalvenousgas
AT parkjonghoon clinicaloutcomesinsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementofhepaticportalvenousgas
AT kwonsanghwy clinicaloutcomesinsurgicalandnonsurgicalmanagementofhepaticportalvenousgas