Cargando…

Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit

BACKGROUND: Excessive or inadequate intravenous fluid given in the perioperative period can affect outcomes. A number of guidelines exist but these can conflict with the entrenched practice, evidence base and prescriber knowledge. We conducted a multi-centre audit of intraoperative and postoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Benjamin, Schopflin, Christian, Khaghani, Clare, Edwards, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26688719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-015-0025-9
_version_ 1782406121885007872
author Harris, Benjamin
Schopflin, Christian
Khaghani, Clare
Edwards, Mark
author_facet Harris, Benjamin
Schopflin, Christian
Khaghani, Clare
Edwards, Mark
author_sort Harris, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Excessive or inadequate intravenous fluid given in the perioperative period can affect outcomes. A number of guidelines exist but these can conflict with the entrenched practice, evidence base and prescriber knowledge. We conducted a multi-centre audit of intraoperative and postoperative intravenous fluid therapy to investigate fluid administration practice and frequency of postoperative electrolyte disturbances. METHODS: A retrospective audit was done in five hospitals of adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal, gastrointestinal tract or orthopaedic surgery. The type, volume and quantity of fluid and electrolytes administered during surgery and in 3 days postoperatively was calculated, and electrolyte disturbances were studied using clinical records. RESULTS: Data from four hundred thirty-one patients in five hospitals covering 1157 intravenous fluid days were collected. Balanced crystalloid solutions were almost universally used in the operating theatre and were also the most common fluid administered postoperatively, followed by hypotonic dextrose-saline solutions and 0.9 % sodium chloride. For three common uncomplicated elective operations, the volume of fluid administered intraoperatively demonstrated considerable variability. Over half of the patients received no postoperative fluid on day 1, and even more were commenced on free oral fluids immediately postoperatively or on day 1. Postoperative quantities of sodium exceeded the recommended amounts for maintenance in half of the patients who continued to receive intravenous fluids. Potassium administration in those receiving intravenous fluids was almost universally inadequate. Hypokalaemia and hyponatraemia were the common findings. CONCLUSIONS: We documented the current clinical practice and confirmed that early free oral fluids and cessation of any intravenous fluids is common postoperatively in keeping with the aims of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes. Excessive sodium and water and inadequate potassium in those given intravenous fluids postoperatively is common and needs to be investigated. The variation in intraoperative fluid volume administration for three common procedures is considerable and in keeping with other international studies. Future trials of fluid therapy should include the intraoperative and postoperative phases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4683958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46839582015-12-19 Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit Harris, Benjamin Schopflin, Christian Khaghani, Clare Edwards, Mark Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Excessive or inadequate intravenous fluid given in the perioperative period can affect outcomes. A number of guidelines exist but these can conflict with the entrenched practice, evidence base and prescriber knowledge. We conducted a multi-centre audit of intraoperative and postoperative intravenous fluid therapy to investigate fluid administration practice and frequency of postoperative electrolyte disturbances. METHODS: A retrospective audit was done in five hospitals of adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal, gastrointestinal tract or orthopaedic surgery. The type, volume and quantity of fluid and electrolytes administered during surgery and in 3 days postoperatively was calculated, and electrolyte disturbances were studied using clinical records. RESULTS: Data from four hundred thirty-one patients in five hospitals covering 1157 intravenous fluid days were collected. Balanced crystalloid solutions were almost universally used in the operating theatre and were also the most common fluid administered postoperatively, followed by hypotonic dextrose-saline solutions and 0.9 % sodium chloride. For three common uncomplicated elective operations, the volume of fluid administered intraoperatively demonstrated considerable variability. Over half of the patients received no postoperative fluid on day 1, and even more were commenced on free oral fluids immediately postoperatively or on day 1. Postoperative quantities of sodium exceeded the recommended amounts for maintenance in half of the patients who continued to receive intravenous fluids. Potassium administration in those receiving intravenous fluids was almost universally inadequate. Hypokalaemia and hyponatraemia were the common findings. CONCLUSIONS: We documented the current clinical practice and confirmed that early free oral fluids and cessation of any intravenous fluids is common postoperatively in keeping with the aims of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes. Excessive sodium and water and inadequate potassium in those given intravenous fluids postoperatively is common and needs to be investigated. The variation in intraoperative fluid volume administration for three common procedures is considerable and in keeping with other international studies. Future trials of fluid therapy should include the intraoperative and postoperative phases. BioMed Central 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4683958/ /pubmed/26688719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-015-0025-9 Text en © Harris et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Harris, Benjamin
Schopflin, Christian
Khaghani, Clare
Edwards, Mark
Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
title Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
title_full Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
title_fullStr Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
title_short Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
title_sort perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4683958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26688719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-015-0025-9
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisbenjamin perioperativeintravenousfluidprescribingamulticentreaudit
AT schopflinchristian perioperativeintravenousfluidprescribingamulticentreaudit
AT khaghaniclare perioperativeintravenousfluidprescribingamulticentreaudit
AT edwardsmark perioperativeintravenousfluidprescribingamulticentreaudit
AT perioperativeintravenousfluidprescribingamulticentreaudit