Cargando…

A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

STUDY DESIGN. An in vitro study of the intervertebral disc (IVD) structure using 9.4T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OBJECTIVE. Investigate the potential of ultrahigh-field strength MRI for higher quality 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric MRI datasets of the IVD to better distinguish structural detai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijayathunga, Vithanage N., Ridgway, John P., Ingham, Eileen, Treanor, Darren, Carey, Duane, Bulpitt, Andy, Magee, Derek, Damion, Robin, Wilcox, Ruth K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001075
_version_ 1782406140593700864
author Wijayathunga, Vithanage N.
Ridgway, John P.
Ingham, Eileen
Treanor, Darren
Carey, Duane
Bulpitt, Andy
Magee, Derek
Damion, Robin
Wilcox, Ruth K.
author_facet Wijayathunga, Vithanage N.
Ridgway, John P.
Ingham, Eileen
Treanor, Darren
Carey, Duane
Bulpitt, Andy
Magee, Derek
Damion, Robin
Wilcox, Ruth K.
author_sort Wijayathunga, Vithanage N.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN. An in vitro study of the intervertebral disc (IVD) structure using 9.4T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OBJECTIVE. Investigate the potential of ultrahigh-field strength MRI for higher quality 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric MRI datasets of the IVD to better distinguish structural details. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. MRI has the advantages of being nondestructive and 3D in comparison to most techniques used to obtain the structural details of biological tissues, however, its poor image quality at higher resolution is a limiting factor. Ultrahigh-field MRI could improve the imaging of biological tissues but the current understanding of its application for spinal tissue is limited. METHODS. 2 ovine spinal segments (C7–T1, T2–T3) containing the IVD were separately imaged using 2 sequences; 3D spin echo (multislice-multiecho) pulse sequence for the C7–T1 sample and 3D gradient echo (fast-low-angle-shot) pulse sequence for the T2–T3 sample. The C7–T1 sample was subsequently decalcified and imaged again using the same scanning parameters. Histological sections obtained from the decalcified sample were stained followed by digital scanning. Observations from corresponding MRI slices and histological sections were compared as a method of confirmation of morphology captured under MRI. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and relative-contrast values were calculated for quantitative evaluation of image quality. RESULTS. Measurements from histology sections and corresponding MRI slices matched well. Both sequences revealed finer details of the IVD structure. Under the spin echo sequence, the annulus lamellae architecture was distinguishable and the SNR and CNR values were higher. The relative contrast was considerably higher between high (nucleus) and low (bone) signal constituents, but between the nucleus and the annulus the relative contrast was low. Under the gradient echo sequence, although the relative contrasts between constituents were poor, the fiber orientation was clearly manifested. CONCLUSION. The obtained positive results demonstrate the potential of ultrahigh-field strength MRI to nondestructively capture the IVD structure. Level of Evidence: N/A
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46841012016-06-01 A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Wijayathunga, Vithanage N. Ridgway, John P. Ingham, Eileen Treanor, Darren Carey, Duane Bulpitt, Andy Magee, Derek Damion, Robin Wilcox, Ruth K. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Diagnostics STUDY DESIGN. An in vitro study of the intervertebral disc (IVD) structure using 9.4T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OBJECTIVE. Investigate the potential of ultrahigh-field strength MRI for higher quality 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric MRI datasets of the IVD to better distinguish structural details. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. MRI has the advantages of being nondestructive and 3D in comparison to most techniques used to obtain the structural details of biological tissues, however, its poor image quality at higher resolution is a limiting factor. Ultrahigh-field MRI could improve the imaging of biological tissues but the current understanding of its application for spinal tissue is limited. METHODS. 2 ovine spinal segments (C7–T1, T2–T3) containing the IVD were separately imaged using 2 sequences; 3D spin echo (multislice-multiecho) pulse sequence for the C7–T1 sample and 3D gradient echo (fast-low-angle-shot) pulse sequence for the T2–T3 sample. The C7–T1 sample was subsequently decalcified and imaged again using the same scanning parameters. Histological sections obtained from the decalcified sample were stained followed by digital scanning. Observations from corresponding MRI slices and histological sections were compared as a method of confirmation of morphology captured under MRI. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and relative-contrast values were calculated for quantitative evaluation of image quality. RESULTS. Measurements from histology sections and corresponding MRI slices matched well. Both sequences revealed finer details of the IVD structure. Under the spin echo sequence, the annulus lamellae architecture was distinguishable and the SNR and CNR values were higher. The relative contrast was considerably higher between high (nucleus) and low (bone) signal constituents, but between the nucleus and the annulus the relative contrast was low. Under the gradient echo sequence, although the relative contrasts between constituents were poor, the fiber orientation was clearly manifested. CONCLUSION. The obtained positive results demonstrate the potential of ultrahigh-field strength MRI to nondestructively capture the IVD structure. Level of Evidence: N/A Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-12 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4684101/ /pubmed/26244404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001075 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Wijayathunga, Vithanage N.
Ridgway, John P.
Ingham, Eileen
Treanor, Darren
Carey, Duane
Bulpitt, Andy
Magee, Derek
Damion, Robin
Wilcox, Ruth K.
A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort nondestructive method to distinguish the internal constituent architecture of the intervertebral discs using 9.4 tesla magnetic resonance imaging
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001075
work_keys_str_mv AT wijayathungavithanagen anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT ridgwayjohnp anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT inghameileen anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT treanordarren anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT careyduane anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT bulpittandy anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT mageederek anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT damionrobin anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT wilcoxruthk anondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT wijayathungavithanagen nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT ridgwayjohnp nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT inghameileen nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT treanordarren nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT careyduane nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT bulpittandy nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT mageederek nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT damionrobin nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging
AT wilcoxruthk nondestructivemethodtodistinguishtheinternalconstituentarchitectureoftheintervertebraldiscsusing94teslamagneticresonanceimaging