Cargando…

Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review

The understanding of the structure of free-roaming dog populations is of extreme importance for the planning and monitoring of populational control strategies and animal welfare. The methods used to estimate the abundance of this group of dogs are more complex than the ones used with domiciled owned...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belo, Vinícius Silva, Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro, da Silva, Eduardo Sérgio, Barbosa, David Soeiro, Struchiner, Claudio José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26673165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144830
_version_ 1782406150622281728
author Belo, Vinícius Silva
Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro
da Silva, Eduardo Sérgio
Barbosa, David Soeiro
Struchiner, Claudio José
author_facet Belo, Vinícius Silva
Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro
da Silva, Eduardo Sérgio
Barbosa, David Soeiro
Struchiner, Claudio José
author_sort Belo, Vinícius Silva
collection PubMed
description The understanding of the structure of free-roaming dog populations is of extreme importance for the planning and monitoring of populational control strategies and animal welfare. The methods used to estimate the abundance of this group of dogs are more complex than the ones used with domiciled owned dogs. In this systematic review, we analyze the techniques and the results obtained in studies that seek to estimate the size of free-ranging dog populations. Twenty-six studies were reviewed regarding the quality of execution and their capacity to generate valid estimates. Seven of the eight publications that take a simple count of the animal population did not consider the different probabilities of animal detection; only one study used methods based on distances; twelve relied on capture-recapture models for closed populations without considering heterogeneities in capture probabilities; six studies applied their own methods with different potential and limitations. Potential sources of bias in the studies were related to the inadequate description or implementation of animal capturing or viewing procedures and to inadequacies in the identification and registration of dogs. Thus, there was a predominance of estimates with low validity. Abundance and density estimates carried high variability, and all studies identified a greater number of male dogs. We point to enhancements necessary for the implementation of future studies and to potential updates and revisions to the recommendations of the World Health Organization with respect to the estimation of free-ranging dog populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46842172015-12-31 Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review Belo, Vinícius Silva Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro da Silva, Eduardo Sérgio Barbosa, David Soeiro Struchiner, Claudio José PLoS One Research Article The understanding of the structure of free-roaming dog populations is of extreme importance for the planning and monitoring of populational control strategies and animal welfare. The methods used to estimate the abundance of this group of dogs are more complex than the ones used with domiciled owned dogs. In this systematic review, we analyze the techniques and the results obtained in studies that seek to estimate the size of free-ranging dog populations. Twenty-six studies were reviewed regarding the quality of execution and their capacity to generate valid estimates. Seven of the eight publications that take a simple count of the animal population did not consider the different probabilities of animal detection; only one study used methods based on distances; twelve relied on capture-recapture models for closed populations without considering heterogeneities in capture probabilities; six studies applied their own methods with different potential and limitations. Potential sources of bias in the studies were related to the inadequate description or implementation of animal capturing or viewing procedures and to inadequacies in the identification and registration of dogs. Thus, there was a predominance of estimates with low validity. Abundance and density estimates carried high variability, and all studies identified a greater number of male dogs. We point to enhancements necessary for the implementation of future studies and to potential updates and revisions to the recommendations of the World Health Organization with respect to the estimation of free-ranging dog populations. Public Library of Science 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4684217/ /pubmed/26673165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144830 Text en © 2015 Belo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belo, Vinícius Silva
Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro
da Silva, Eduardo Sérgio
Barbosa, David Soeiro
Struchiner, Claudio José
Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review
title Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review
title_full Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review
title_short Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review
title_sort population estimation methods for free-ranging dogs: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26673165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144830
work_keys_str_mv AT beloviniciussilva populationestimationmethodsforfreerangingdogsasystematicreview
AT werneckguilhermeloureiro populationestimationmethodsforfreerangingdogsasystematicreview
AT dasilvaeduardosergio populationestimationmethodsforfreerangingdogsasystematicreview
AT barbosadavidsoeiro populationestimationmethodsforfreerangingdogsasystematicreview
AT struchinerclaudiojose populationestimationmethodsforfreerangingdogsasystematicreview