Cargando…

Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Failure to recognize acute deterioration in hospitalized patients may contribute to cardiopulmonary arrest, unscheduled intensive care unit admission and increased mortality. PURPOSE: In this systematic review we aimed to determine whether continuous non-invasive respiratory monitoring i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Loon, Kim, van Zaane, Bas, Bosch, Els J., Kalkman, Cor J., Peelen, Linda M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144626
_version_ 1782406153586606080
author van Loon, Kim
van Zaane, Bas
Bosch, Els J.
Kalkman, Cor J.
Peelen, Linda M.
author_facet van Loon, Kim
van Zaane, Bas
Bosch, Els J.
Kalkman, Cor J.
Peelen, Linda M.
author_sort van Loon, Kim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failure to recognize acute deterioration in hospitalized patients may contribute to cardiopulmonary arrest, unscheduled intensive care unit admission and increased mortality. PURPOSE: In this systematic review we aimed to determine whether continuous non-invasive respiratory monitoring improves early diagnosis of patient deterioration and reduces critical incidents on hospital wards. DATA SOURCES: Studies were retrieved from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library, searched from 1970 till October 25, 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Electronic databases were searched using keywords and corresponding synonyms ‘ward’, ‘continuous’, ‘monitoring’ and ‘respiration’. Pediatric, fetal and animal studies were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Since no validated tool is currently available for diagnostic or intervention studies with continuous monitoring, methodological quality was assessed with a modified tool based on modified STARD, CONSORT, and TREND statements. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six intervention and five diagnostic studies were included, evaluating the use of eight different devices for continuous respiratory monitoring. Quantitative data synthesis was not possible because intervention, study design and outcomes differed considerably between studies. Outcomes estimates for the intervention studies ranged from RR 0.14 (0.03, 0.64) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation to RR 1.00 (0.41, 2.35) for unplanned ICU admission after introduction of continuous respiratory monitoring, LIMITATIONS: The methodological quality of most studies was moderate, e.g. ‘before-after’ designs, incomplete reporting of primary outcomes, and incomplete clinical implementation of the monitoring system. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this systematic review, implementation of routine continuous non-invasive respiratory monitoring on general hospital wards cannot yet be advocated as results are inconclusive, and methodological quality of the studies needs improvement. Future research in this area should focus on technology explicitly suitable for low care settings and tailored alarm and treatment algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46842302015-12-31 Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review van Loon, Kim van Zaane, Bas Bosch, Els J. Kalkman, Cor J. Peelen, Linda M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Failure to recognize acute deterioration in hospitalized patients may contribute to cardiopulmonary arrest, unscheduled intensive care unit admission and increased mortality. PURPOSE: In this systematic review we aimed to determine whether continuous non-invasive respiratory monitoring improves early diagnosis of patient deterioration and reduces critical incidents on hospital wards. DATA SOURCES: Studies were retrieved from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library, searched from 1970 till October 25, 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Electronic databases were searched using keywords and corresponding synonyms ‘ward’, ‘continuous’, ‘monitoring’ and ‘respiration’. Pediatric, fetal and animal studies were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Since no validated tool is currently available for diagnostic or intervention studies with continuous monitoring, methodological quality was assessed with a modified tool based on modified STARD, CONSORT, and TREND statements. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six intervention and five diagnostic studies were included, evaluating the use of eight different devices for continuous respiratory monitoring. Quantitative data synthesis was not possible because intervention, study design and outcomes differed considerably between studies. Outcomes estimates for the intervention studies ranged from RR 0.14 (0.03, 0.64) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation to RR 1.00 (0.41, 2.35) for unplanned ICU admission after introduction of continuous respiratory monitoring, LIMITATIONS: The methodological quality of most studies was moderate, e.g. ‘before-after’ designs, incomplete reporting of primary outcomes, and incomplete clinical implementation of the monitoring system. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this systematic review, implementation of routine continuous non-invasive respiratory monitoring on general hospital wards cannot yet be advocated as results are inconclusive, and methodological quality of the studies needs improvement. Future research in this area should focus on technology explicitly suitable for low care settings and tailored alarm and treatment algorithms. Public Library of Science 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4684230/ /pubmed/26658343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144626 Text en © 2015 van Loon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Loon, Kim
van Zaane, Bas
Bosch, Els J.
Kalkman, Cor J.
Peelen, Linda M.
Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review
title Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review
title_full Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review
title_short Non-Invasive Continuous Respiratory Monitoring on General Hospital Wards: A Systematic Review
title_sort non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring on general hospital wards: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144626
work_keys_str_mv AT vanloonkim noninvasivecontinuousrespiratorymonitoringongeneralhospitalwardsasystematicreview
AT vanzaanebas noninvasivecontinuousrespiratorymonitoringongeneralhospitalwardsasystematicreview
AT boschelsj noninvasivecontinuousrespiratorymonitoringongeneralhospitalwardsasystematicreview
AT kalkmancorj noninvasivecontinuousrespiratorymonitoringongeneralhospitalwardsasystematicreview
AT peelenlindam noninvasivecontinuousrespiratorymonitoringongeneralhospitalwardsasystematicreview