Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
One of the most important challenges in agriculture is to determine the effectiveness and environmental impact of certain farming practices. The aim of present study was to determine and compare the taxonomic composition of the microbiomes established in soil following long-term exposure (14 years)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26684619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145072 |
_version_ | 1782406158861991936 |
---|---|
author | Pershina, Elizaveta Valkonen, Jari Kurki, Päivi Ivanova, Ekaterina Chirak, Evgeny Korvigo, Ilia Provorov, Nykolay Andronov, Evgeny |
author_facet | Pershina, Elizaveta Valkonen, Jari Kurki, Päivi Ivanova, Ekaterina Chirak, Evgeny Korvigo, Ilia Provorov, Nykolay Andronov, Evgeny |
author_sort | Pershina, Elizaveta |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the most important challenges in agriculture is to determine the effectiveness and environmental impact of certain farming practices. The aim of present study was to determine and compare the taxonomic composition of the microbiomes established in soil following long-term exposure (14 years) to a conventional and organic farming systems (CFS and OFS accordingly). Soil from unclared forest next to the fields was used as a control. The analysis was based on RT-PCR and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes of bacteria and archaea. The number of bacteria was significantly lower in CFS than in OFS and woodland. The highest amount of archaea was detected in woodland, whereas the amounts in CFS and OFS were lower and similar. The most common phyla in the soil microbial communities analyzed were Proteobacteria (57.9%), Acidobacteria (16.1%), Actinobacteria (7.9%), Verrucomicrobia (2.0%), Bacteroidetes (2.7%) and Firmicutes (4.8%). Woodland soil differed from croplands in the taxonomic composition of microbial phyla. Croplands were enriched with Proteobacteria (mainly the genus Pseudomonas), while Acidobacteria were detected almost exclusively in woodland soil. The most pronounced differences between the CFS and OFS microbiomes were found within the genus Pseudomonas, which significantly (p<0,05) increased its number in CFS soil compared to OFS. Other differences in microbiomes of cropping systems concerned minor taxa. A higher relative abundance of bacteria belonging to the families Oxalobacteriaceae, Koribacteriaceae, Nakamurellaceae and genera Ralstonia, Paenibacillus and Pedobacter was found in CFS as compared with OFS. On the other hand, microbiomes of OFS were enriched with proteobacteria of the family Comamonadaceae (genera Hylemonella) and Hyphomicrobiaceae, actinobacteria from the family Micrococcaceae, and bacteria of the genera Geobacter, Methylotenera, Rhizobium (mainly Rhizobium leguminosarum) and Clostridium. Thus, the fields under OFS and CFS did not differ greatly for the composition of the microbiome. These results, which were also confirmed by cluster analysis, indicated that microbial communities in the field soil do not necessarily differ largely between conventional and organic farming systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4684275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46842752015-12-31 Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems Pershina, Elizaveta Valkonen, Jari Kurki, Päivi Ivanova, Ekaterina Chirak, Evgeny Korvigo, Ilia Provorov, Nykolay Andronov, Evgeny PLoS One Research Article One of the most important challenges in agriculture is to determine the effectiveness and environmental impact of certain farming practices. The aim of present study was to determine and compare the taxonomic composition of the microbiomes established in soil following long-term exposure (14 years) to a conventional and organic farming systems (CFS and OFS accordingly). Soil from unclared forest next to the fields was used as a control. The analysis was based on RT-PCR and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes of bacteria and archaea. The number of bacteria was significantly lower in CFS than in OFS and woodland. The highest amount of archaea was detected in woodland, whereas the amounts in CFS and OFS were lower and similar. The most common phyla in the soil microbial communities analyzed were Proteobacteria (57.9%), Acidobacteria (16.1%), Actinobacteria (7.9%), Verrucomicrobia (2.0%), Bacteroidetes (2.7%) and Firmicutes (4.8%). Woodland soil differed from croplands in the taxonomic composition of microbial phyla. Croplands were enriched with Proteobacteria (mainly the genus Pseudomonas), while Acidobacteria were detected almost exclusively in woodland soil. The most pronounced differences between the CFS and OFS microbiomes were found within the genus Pseudomonas, which significantly (p<0,05) increased its number in CFS soil compared to OFS. Other differences in microbiomes of cropping systems concerned minor taxa. A higher relative abundance of bacteria belonging to the families Oxalobacteriaceae, Koribacteriaceae, Nakamurellaceae and genera Ralstonia, Paenibacillus and Pedobacter was found in CFS as compared with OFS. On the other hand, microbiomes of OFS were enriched with proteobacteria of the family Comamonadaceae (genera Hylemonella) and Hyphomicrobiaceae, actinobacteria from the family Micrococcaceae, and bacteria of the genera Geobacter, Methylotenera, Rhizobium (mainly Rhizobium leguminosarum) and Clostridium. Thus, the fields under OFS and CFS did not differ greatly for the composition of the microbiome. These results, which were also confirmed by cluster analysis, indicated that microbial communities in the field soil do not necessarily differ largely between conventional and organic farming systems. Public Library of Science 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4684275/ /pubmed/26684619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145072 Text en © 2015 Pershina et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pershina, Elizaveta Valkonen, Jari Kurki, Päivi Ivanova, Ekaterina Chirak, Evgeny Korvigo, Ilia Provorov, Nykolay Andronov, Evgeny Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems |
title | Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems |
title_sort | comparative analysis of prokaryotic communities associated with organic and conventional farming systems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26684619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pershinaelizaveta comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT valkonenjari comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT kurkipaivi comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT ivanovaekaterina comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT chirakevgeny comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT korvigoilia comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT provorovnykolay comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems AT andronovevgeny comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems |