Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems

One of the most important challenges in agriculture is to determine the effectiveness and environmental impact of certain farming practices. The aim of present study was to determine and compare the taxonomic composition of the microbiomes established in soil following long-term exposure (14 years)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pershina, Elizaveta, Valkonen, Jari, Kurki, Päivi, Ivanova, Ekaterina, Chirak, Evgeny, Korvigo, Ilia, Provorov, Nykolay, Andronov, Evgeny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26684619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145072
_version_ 1782406158861991936
author Pershina, Elizaveta
Valkonen, Jari
Kurki, Päivi
Ivanova, Ekaterina
Chirak, Evgeny
Korvigo, Ilia
Provorov, Nykolay
Andronov, Evgeny
author_facet Pershina, Elizaveta
Valkonen, Jari
Kurki, Päivi
Ivanova, Ekaterina
Chirak, Evgeny
Korvigo, Ilia
Provorov, Nykolay
Andronov, Evgeny
author_sort Pershina, Elizaveta
collection PubMed
description One of the most important challenges in agriculture is to determine the effectiveness and environmental impact of certain farming practices. The aim of present study was to determine and compare the taxonomic composition of the microbiomes established in soil following long-term exposure (14 years) to a conventional and organic farming systems (CFS and OFS accordingly). Soil from unclared forest next to the fields was used as a control. The analysis was based on RT-PCR and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes of bacteria and archaea. The number of bacteria was significantly lower in CFS than in OFS and woodland. The highest amount of archaea was detected in woodland, whereas the amounts in CFS and OFS were lower and similar. The most common phyla in the soil microbial communities analyzed were Proteobacteria (57.9%), Acidobacteria (16.1%), Actinobacteria (7.9%), Verrucomicrobia (2.0%), Bacteroidetes (2.7%) and Firmicutes (4.8%). Woodland soil differed from croplands in the taxonomic composition of microbial phyla. Croplands were enriched with Proteobacteria (mainly the genus Pseudomonas), while Acidobacteria were detected almost exclusively in woodland soil. The most pronounced differences between the CFS and OFS microbiomes were found within the genus Pseudomonas, which significantly (p<0,05) increased its number in CFS soil compared to OFS. Other differences in microbiomes of cropping systems concerned minor taxa. A higher relative abundance of bacteria belonging to the families Oxalobacteriaceae, Koribacteriaceae, Nakamurellaceae and genera Ralstonia, Paenibacillus and Pedobacter was found in CFS as compared with OFS. On the other hand, microbiomes of OFS were enriched with proteobacteria of the family Comamonadaceae (genera Hylemonella) and Hyphomicrobiaceae, actinobacteria from the family Micrococcaceae, and bacteria of the genera Geobacter, Methylotenera, Rhizobium (mainly Rhizobium leguminosarum) and Clostridium. Thus, the fields under OFS and CFS did not differ greatly for the composition of the microbiome. These results, which were also confirmed by cluster analysis, indicated that microbial communities in the field soil do not necessarily differ largely between conventional and organic farming systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46842752015-12-31 Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems Pershina, Elizaveta Valkonen, Jari Kurki, Päivi Ivanova, Ekaterina Chirak, Evgeny Korvigo, Ilia Provorov, Nykolay Andronov, Evgeny PLoS One Research Article One of the most important challenges in agriculture is to determine the effectiveness and environmental impact of certain farming practices. The aim of present study was to determine and compare the taxonomic composition of the microbiomes established in soil following long-term exposure (14 years) to a conventional and organic farming systems (CFS and OFS accordingly). Soil from unclared forest next to the fields was used as a control. The analysis was based on RT-PCR and pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes of bacteria and archaea. The number of bacteria was significantly lower in CFS than in OFS and woodland. The highest amount of archaea was detected in woodland, whereas the amounts in CFS and OFS were lower and similar. The most common phyla in the soil microbial communities analyzed were Proteobacteria (57.9%), Acidobacteria (16.1%), Actinobacteria (7.9%), Verrucomicrobia (2.0%), Bacteroidetes (2.7%) and Firmicutes (4.8%). Woodland soil differed from croplands in the taxonomic composition of microbial phyla. Croplands were enriched with Proteobacteria (mainly the genus Pseudomonas), while Acidobacteria were detected almost exclusively in woodland soil. The most pronounced differences between the CFS and OFS microbiomes were found within the genus Pseudomonas, which significantly (p<0,05) increased its number in CFS soil compared to OFS. Other differences in microbiomes of cropping systems concerned minor taxa. A higher relative abundance of bacteria belonging to the families Oxalobacteriaceae, Koribacteriaceae, Nakamurellaceae and genera Ralstonia, Paenibacillus and Pedobacter was found in CFS as compared with OFS. On the other hand, microbiomes of OFS were enriched with proteobacteria of the family Comamonadaceae (genera Hylemonella) and Hyphomicrobiaceae, actinobacteria from the family Micrococcaceae, and bacteria of the genera Geobacter, Methylotenera, Rhizobium (mainly Rhizobium leguminosarum) and Clostridium. Thus, the fields under OFS and CFS did not differ greatly for the composition of the microbiome. These results, which were also confirmed by cluster analysis, indicated that microbial communities in the field soil do not necessarily differ largely between conventional and organic farming systems. Public Library of Science 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4684275/ /pubmed/26684619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145072 Text en © 2015 Pershina et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pershina, Elizaveta
Valkonen, Jari
Kurki, Päivi
Ivanova, Ekaterina
Chirak, Evgeny
Korvigo, Ilia
Provorov, Nykolay
Andronov, Evgeny
Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
title Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
title_full Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
title_short Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
title_sort comparative analysis of prokaryotic communities associated with organic and conventional farming systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26684619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145072
work_keys_str_mv AT pershinaelizaveta comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT valkonenjari comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT kurkipaivi comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT ivanovaekaterina comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT chirakevgeny comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT korvigoilia comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT provorovnykolay comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems
AT andronovevgeny comparativeanalysisofprokaryoticcommunitiesassociatedwithorganicandconventionalfarmingsystems