Cargando…

Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner

INTRODUCTION: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmström, Oscar, Linder, Nina, Lundin, Mikael, Moilanen, Hannu, Suutala, Antti, Turkki, Riku, Joensuu, Heikki, Isola, Jorma, Diwan, Vinod, Lundin, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144688
_version_ 1782406180477337600
author Holmström, Oscar
Linder, Nina
Lundin, Mikael
Moilanen, Hannu
Suutala, Antti
Turkki, Riku
Joensuu, Heikki
Isola, Jorma
Diwan, Vinod
Lundin, Johan
author_facet Holmström, Oscar
Linder, Nina
Lundin, Mikael
Moilanen, Hannu
Suutala, Antti
Turkki, Riku
Joensuu, Heikki
Isola, Jorma
Diwan, Vinod
Lundin, Johan
author_sort Holmström, Oscar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) expression in breast cancer samples. Studies suggest computer-assisted analysis of tumor samples digitized with whole slide-scanners may be comparable to manual scoring, here we study whether similar results can be obtained with the device presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 170 samples of human breast carcinoma, immunostained for ER expression, were digitized with a high-end slide-scanner and the point-of-care microscope. Corresponding regions from the samples were extracted, and ER status was determined visually and digitally. Samples were classified as ER negative (<1% ER positivity) or positive, and further into weakly (1–10% positivity) and strongly positive. Interobserver agreement (Cohen’s kappa) was measured and correlation coefficients (Pearson’s product-momentum) were calculated for comparison of the methods. RESULTS: Correlation and interobserver agreement (r = 0.98, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.84, CI95% = 0.75–0.94) were strong in the results from both devices. Concordance of the point-of-care microscope and the manual scoring was good (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.71, CI95% = 0.61–0.80), and comparable to the concordance between the slide scanner and manual scoring (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.69, CI95% = 0.60–0.78). Fourteen (8%) discrepant cases between manual and device-based scoring were present with the slide scanner, and 16 (9%) with the point-of-care microscope, all representing samples of low ER expression. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor ER status can be accurately quantified with a low-cost imaging device and digital image-analysis, with results comparable to conventional computer-assisted or manual scoring. This technology could potentially be expanded for other histopathological applications at the point-of-care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46843742015-12-31 Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner Holmström, Oscar Linder, Nina Lundin, Mikael Moilanen, Hannu Suutala, Antti Turkki, Riku Joensuu, Heikki Isola, Jorma Diwan, Vinod Lundin, Johan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) expression in breast cancer samples. Studies suggest computer-assisted analysis of tumor samples digitized with whole slide-scanners may be comparable to manual scoring, here we study whether similar results can be obtained with the device presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 170 samples of human breast carcinoma, immunostained for ER expression, were digitized with a high-end slide-scanner and the point-of-care microscope. Corresponding regions from the samples were extracted, and ER status was determined visually and digitally. Samples were classified as ER negative (<1% ER positivity) or positive, and further into weakly (1–10% positivity) and strongly positive. Interobserver agreement (Cohen’s kappa) was measured and correlation coefficients (Pearson’s product-momentum) were calculated for comparison of the methods. RESULTS: Correlation and interobserver agreement (r = 0.98, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.84, CI95% = 0.75–0.94) were strong in the results from both devices. Concordance of the point-of-care microscope and the manual scoring was good (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.71, CI95% = 0.61–0.80), and comparable to the concordance between the slide scanner and manual scoring (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.69, CI95% = 0.60–0.78). Fourteen (8%) discrepant cases between manual and device-based scoring were present with the slide scanner, and 16 (9%) with the point-of-care microscope, all representing samples of low ER expression. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor ER status can be accurately quantified with a low-cost imaging device and digital image-analysis, with results comparable to conventional computer-assisted or manual scoring. This technology could potentially be expanded for other histopathological applications at the point-of-care. Public Library of Science 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4684374/ /pubmed/26659386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144688 Text en © 2015 Holmström et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Holmström, Oscar
Linder, Nina
Lundin, Mikael
Moilanen, Hannu
Suutala, Antti
Turkki, Riku
Joensuu, Heikki
Isola, Jorma
Diwan, Vinod
Lundin, Johan
Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
title Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
title_full Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
title_fullStr Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
title_short Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
title_sort quantification of estrogen receptor-alpha expression in human breast carcinomas with a miniaturized, low-cost digital microscope: a comparison with a high-end whole slide-scanner
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144688
work_keys_str_mv AT holmstromoscar quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT lindernina quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT lundinmikael quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT moilanenhannu quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT suutalaantti quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT turkkiriku quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT joensuuheikki quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT isolajorma quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT diwanvinod quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner
AT lundinjohan quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner