Cargando…
Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner
INTRODUCTION: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144688 |
_version_ | 1782406180477337600 |
---|---|
author | Holmström, Oscar Linder, Nina Lundin, Mikael Moilanen, Hannu Suutala, Antti Turkki, Riku Joensuu, Heikki Isola, Jorma Diwan, Vinod Lundin, Johan |
author_facet | Holmström, Oscar Linder, Nina Lundin, Mikael Moilanen, Hannu Suutala, Antti Turkki, Riku Joensuu, Heikki Isola, Jorma Diwan, Vinod Lundin, Johan |
author_sort | Holmström, Oscar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) expression in breast cancer samples. Studies suggest computer-assisted analysis of tumor samples digitized with whole slide-scanners may be comparable to manual scoring, here we study whether similar results can be obtained with the device presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 170 samples of human breast carcinoma, immunostained for ER expression, were digitized with a high-end slide-scanner and the point-of-care microscope. Corresponding regions from the samples were extracted, and ER status was determined visually and digitally. Samples were classified as ER negative (<1% ER positivity) or positive, and further into weakly (1–10% positivity) and strongly positive. Interobserver agreement (Cohen’s kappa) was measured and correlation coefficients (Pearson’s product-momentum) were calculated for comparison of the methods. RESULTS: Correlation and interobserver agreement (r = 0.98, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.84, CI95% = 0.75–0.94) were strong in the results from both devices. Concordance of the point-of-care microscope and the manual scoring was good (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.71, CI95% = 0.61–0.80), and comparable to the concordance between the slide scanner and manual scoring (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.69, CI95% = 0.60–0.78). Fourteen (8%) discrepant cases between manual and device-based scoring were present with the slide scanner, and 16 (9%) with the point-of-care microscope, all representing samples of low ER expression. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor ER status can be accurately quantified with a low-cost imaging device and digital image-analysis, with results comparable to conventional computer-assisted or manual scoring. This technology could potentially be expanded for other histopathological applications at the point-of-care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4684374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46843742015-12-31 Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner Holmström, Oscar Linder, Nina Lundin, Mikael Moilanen, Hannu Suutala, Antti Turkki, Riku Joensuu, Heikki Isola, Jorma Diwan, Vinod Lundin, Johan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) expression in breast cancer samples. Studies suggest computer-assisted analysis of tumor samples digitized with whole slide-scanners may be comparable to manual scoring, here we study whether similar results can be obtained with the device presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 170 samples of human breast carcinoma, immunostained for ER expression, were digitized with a high-end slide-scanner and the point-of-care microscope. Corresponding regions from the samples were extracted, and ER status was determined visually and digitally. Samples were classified as ER negative (<1% ER positivity) or positive, and further into weakly (1–10% positivity) and strongly positive. Interobserver agreement (Cohen’s kappa) was measured and correlation coefficients (Pearson’s product-momentum) were calculated for comparison of the methods. RESULTS: Correlation and interobserver agreement (r = 0.98, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.84, CI95% = 0.75–0.94) were strong in the results from both devices. Concordance of the point-of-care microscope and the manual scoring was good (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.71, CI95% = 0.61–0.80), and comparable to the concordance between the slide scanner and manual scoring (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.69, CI95% = 0.60–0.78). Fourteen (8%) discrepant cases between manual and device-based scoring were present with the slide scanner, and 16 (9%) with the point-of-care microscope, all representing samples of low ER expression. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor ER status can be accurately quantified with a low-cost imaging device and digital image-analysis, with results comparable to conventional computer-assisted or manual scoring. This technology could potentially be expanded for other histopathological applications at the point-of-care. Public Library of Science 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4684374/ /pubmed/26659386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144688 Text en © 2015 Holmström et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Holmström, Oscar Linder, Nina Lundin, Mikael Moilanen, Hannu Suutala, Antti Turkki, Riku Joensuu, Heikki Isola, Jorma Diwan, Vinod Lundin, Johan Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner |
title | Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner |
title_full | Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner |
title_fullStr | Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner |
title_short | Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner |
title_sort | quantification of estrogen receptor-alpha expression in human breast carcinomas with a miniaturized, low-cost digital microscope: a comparison with a high-end whole slide-scanner |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmstromoscar quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT lindernina quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT lundinmikael quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT moilanenhannu quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT suutalaantti quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT turkkiriku quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT joensuuheikki quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT isolajorma quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT diwanvinod quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner AT lundinjohan quantificationofestrogenreceptoralphaexpressioninhumanbreastcarcinomaswithaminiaturizedlowcostdigitalmicroscopeacomparisonwithahighendwholeslidescanner |