Cargando…
Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biological medicinal products (biologics) are subject to specific pharmacovigilance requirements to ensure that biologics are identifiable by brand name and batch number in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. Since Member States collect ADR data at the national level befor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0149-y |
_version_ | 1782406196315029504 |
---|---|
author | Klein, Kevin De Bruin, Marie L. Broekmans, Andre W. Stolk, Pieter |
author_facet | Klein, Kevin De Bruin, Marie L. Broekmans, Andre W. Stolk, Pieter |
author_sort | Klein, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biological medicinal products (biologics) are subject to specific pharmacovigilance requirements to ensure that biologics are identifiable by brand name and batch number in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. Since Member States collect ADR data at the national level before the data is aggregated at the European Union (EU) level, it is important that an unambiguous understanding of which medicinal products belong to the biological product category exists. This study aimed to identify the level of consistency between Member States regarding the classification of biologics by national authorities responsible for ADR reporting. METHODS: A sample list of recombinant biologics from the European Medicines Agency database of European Public Assessment Reports was created to analyze five Member States (Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the UK) according to which products were classified as biologics by each Member State. We calculated the Fleiss kappa value to analyze interrater reliability. RESULTS: A considerable divergence was identified regarding the classification of the 146 recombinant biologics from the sample list: one Member State classified 100 % of the recombinant biologics from the sample list as biologics, whereas the classification rates in the remaining four Member States ranged between 70 and 88 % for products available on the national market. The interrater reliability for 87 products available on the market in all five Member States was considered poor. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies exist between Member States in the classification of biologics; less divergence exists for common well-known biologics. These findings highlight the need to think about the best approaches to translate EU legislation into national practices. Additionally, we recommend a publicly available and frequently updated list of centrally authorized biologics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40259-015-0149-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4684580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46845802015-12-23 Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers Klein, Kevin De Bruin, Marie L. Broekmans, Andre W. Stolk, Pieter BioDrugs Short Communication BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biological medicinal products (biologics) are subject to specific pharmacovigilance requirements to ensure that biologics are identifiable by brand name and batch number in adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. Since Member States collect ADR data at the national level before the data is aggregated at the European Union (EU) level, it is important that an unambiguous understanding of which medicinal products belong to the biological product category exists. This study aimed to identify the level of consistency between Member States regarding the classification of biologics by national authorities responsible for ADR reporting. METHODS: A sample list of recombinant biologics from the European Medicines Agency database of European Public Assessment Reports was created to analyze five Member States (Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the UK) according to which products were classified as biologics by each Member State. We calculated the Fleiss kappa value to analyze interrater reliability. RESULTS: A considerable divergence was identified regarding the classification of the 146 recombinant biologics from the sample list: one Member State classified 100 % of the recombinant biologics from the sample list as biologics, whereas the classification rates in the remaining four Member States ranged between 70 and 88 % for products available on the national market. The interrater reliability for 87 products available on the market in all five Member States was considered poor. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies exist between Member States in the classification of biologics; less divergence exists for common well-known biologics. These findings highlight the need to think about the best approaches to translate EU legislation into national practices. Additionally, we recommend a publicly available and frequently updated list of centrally authorized biologics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40259-015-0149-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-11-30 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4684580/ /pubmed/26621793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0149-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Klein, Kevin De Bruin, Marie L. Broekmans, Andre W. Stolk, Pieter Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers |
title | Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers |
title_full | Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers |
title_fullStr | Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers |
title_short | Classification of Recombinant Biologics in the EU: Divergence Between National Pharmacovigilance Centers |
title_sort | classification of recombinant biologics in the eu: divergence between national pharmacovigilance centers |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26621793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0149-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleinkevin classificationofrecombinantbiologicsintheeudivergencebetweennationalpharmacovigilancecenters AT debruinmariel classificationofrecombinantbiologicsintheeudivergencebetweennationalpharmacovigilancecenters AT broekmansandrew classificationofrecombinantbiologicsintheeudivergencebetweennationalpharmacovigilancecenters AT stolkpieter classificationofrecombinantbiologicsintheeudivergencebetweennationalpharmacovigilancecenters |