Cargando…
Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance
BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have a reputation for being inherently difficult to deliver as planned and often face unforeseen challenges and delays, particularly in relation to organisational and governance difficulties, participant interest, constraints due to allocation of costs...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26683473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1791-7 |
_version_ | 1782406199256285184 |
---|---|
author | Randell, Elizabeth McNamara, Rachel Shaw, Christine Espinasse, Aude Simpson, Sharon Anne |
author_facet | Randell, Elizabeth McNamara, Rachel Shaw, Christine Espinasse, Aude Simpson, Sharon Anne |
author_sort | Randell, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have a reputation for being inherently difficult to deliver as planned and often face unforeseen challenges and delays, particularly in relation to organisational and governance difficulties, participant interest, constraints due to allocation of costs, local investigator interest and lengthy bureaucracy. Recruitment is often difficult and the challenges faced often impact on the cost and delivery of a successful trial within the funded period. This paper reflects upon the challenges faced in delivering a pragmatic RCT of weight loss maintenance in a community setting and suggests some potential solutions. METHODS: The weight loss maintenance in adults trial aimed to evaluate the impact of a 12 month, individually tailored weight maintenance intervention on BMI 3 years from randomisation. Participants were recruited primarily from participant identification centres (PICs)—GP surgeries, exercise on referral schemes and slimming world. The intervention was delivered in community settings. A recruitment strategy implementation plan was drafted to address and monitor poor recruitment. RESULTS: Delays in opening and recruitment were experienced early on. Some were beyond the control of the study team such as; disagreement over allocation of national health service costs and PIC classification as well as difficulties in securing support from research networks. That the intervention was delivered in community settings was often at the root of these issues. Key items to address at the design stage of future trials include feasibility of eligibility criteria. The most effective element of the recruitment implementation plan was to refocus sources of recruitment and target only those who could fulfil the eligibility criteria immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Learnings from this trial should be kept in mind by those designing similar studies in the future. Considering potential governance, cost and research network support implications at the design stage of pragmatic trials of any community-based complex intervention is paramount. The appropriateness and viability of inclusion criteria also require careful consideration as does use of a targeted advertising strategy. Trial registration: ISRCTN35774128, 12/01/2010 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4684604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46846042015-12-20 Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance Randell, Elizabeth McNamara, Rachel Shaw, Christine Espinasse, Aude Simpson, Sharon Anne BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have a reputation for being inherently difficult to deliver as planned and often face unforeseen challenges and delays, particularly in relation to organisational and governance difficulties, participant interest, constraints due to allocation of costs, local investigator interest and lengthy bureaucracy. Recruitment is often difficult and the challenges faced often impact on the cost and delivery of a successful trial within the funded period. This paper reflects upon the challenges faced in delivering a pragmatic RCT of weight loss maintenance in a community setting and suggests some potential solutions. METHODS: The weight loss maintenance in adults trial aimed to evaluate the impact of a 12 month, individually tailored weight maintenance intervention on BMI 3 years from randomisation. Participants were recruited primarily from participant identification centres (PICs)—GP surgeries, exercise on referral schemes and slimming world. The intervention was delivered in community settings. A recruitment strategy implementation plan was drafted to address and monitor poor recruitment. RESULTS: Delays in opening and recruitment were experienced early on. Some were beyond the control of the study team such as; disagreement over allocation of national health service costs and PIC classification as well as difficulties in securing support from research networks. That the intervention was delivered in community settings was often at the root of these issues. Key items to address at the design stage of future trials include feasibility of eligibility criteria. The most effective element of the recruitment implementation plan was to refocus sources of recruitment and target only those who could fulfil the eligibility criteria immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Learnings from this trial should be kept in mind by those designing similar studies in the future. Considering potential governance, cost and research network support implications at the design stage of pragmatic trials of any community-based complex intervention is paramount. The appropriateness and viability of inclusion criteria also require careful consideration as does use of a targeted advertising strategy. Trial registration: ISRCTN35774128, 12/01/2010 BioMed Central 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4684604/ /pubmed/26683473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1791-7 Text en © Randell et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Randell, Elizabeth McNamara, Rachel Shaw, Christine Espinasse, Aude Simpson, Sharon Anne Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
title | Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
title_full | Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
title_fullStr | Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
title_short | Challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
title_sort | challenges of a community based pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of weight loss maintenance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26683473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1791-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randellelizabeth challengesofacommunitybasedpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofweightlossmaintenance AT mcnamararachel challengesofacommunitybasedpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofweightlossmaintenance AT shawchristine challengesofacommunitybasedpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofweightlossmaintenance AT espinasseaude challengesofacommunitybasedpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofweightlossmaintenance AT simpsonsharonanne challengesofacommunitybasedpragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialofweightlossmaintenance |