Cargando…

Tibialis anterior analysis from functional and architectural perspective during isometric foot dorsiflexion: a cross-sectional study of repeated measures

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to establish the relationship and degree of contribution between torque and sonomiography variables (pennation angle – muscle thickness), and electromyography variables (EMG(AreaUnderCurve) – EMG(MaximalPeak)) of the tibialis anterior muscle during (TA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz Muñoz, Maria, González-Sánchez, Manuel, Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26688692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0132-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to establish the relationship and degree of contribution between torque and sonomiography variables (pennation angle – muscle thickness), and electromyography variables (EMG(AreaUnderCurve) – EMG(MaximalPeak)) of the tibialis anterior muscle during (TA) maximal and relative isometric foot dorsiflexion (IFD). Secondary aim: To determine the measurement’s reliability. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. 31 participants (15 men; 16 women) performed IFD at different intensities (100, 75, 50, and 25 %) of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) (three times for each intensity). Outcome variables: To determine the torque, pennation angle, muscle thickness, EMG(MaximalPeak), and EMG(AreaUnderCurve). Statistical analysis: In order to test the measurement’s reliability, Cronbach’s alpha and standard error of the measurement were determined. An inferential analysis was carried out using Pearson correlations(r). For each contraction intensity, a multiple regression analysis was performed, where the dependent variable was torque and the independent variables were EMG(AreaUnderCurve), EMG(MaximalPeak), muscle thickness and pennation angle. RESULTS: All outcome variables show excellent reliability. The highest correlation value was 0.955 (thickness 100 % – thickness 25 %). R(2) values ranged from 0.713 (100 % MVC) to 0.588 (25 % MVC). CONCLUSION: The outcome variables demonstrated excellent reliability in terms of measuring IFD at different intensities. The correlations between all outcome variables were moderate-to-strong. TA functional and architectural variables have a significant impact on the torque variance during IFD at different intensities.