Cargando…

Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Aims. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the role of hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and collagen IV (CIV) in predicting the presence of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) in patients with liver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Xingshun, Li, Hongyu, Chen, Jiang, Xia, Chunlian, Peng, Ying, Dai, Junna, Hou, Yue, Deng, Han, Li, Jing, Guo, Xiaozhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/274534
_version_ 1782406218874093568
author Qi, Xingshun
Li, Hongyu
Chen, Jiang
Xia, Chunlian
Peng, Ying
Dai, Junna
Hou, Yue
Deng, Han
Li, Jing
Guo, Xiaozhong
author_facet Qi, Xingshun
Li, Hongyu
Chen, Jiang
Xia, Chunlian
Peng, Ying
Dai, Junna
Hou, Yue
Deng, Han
Li, Jing
Guo, Xiaozhong
author_sort Qi, Xingshun
collection PubMed
description Background and Aims. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the role of hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and collagen IV (CIV) in predicting the presence of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods. We enrolled 118 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent the tests for the four serum liver fibrosis markers and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the same admissions. The predictive values of the four serum liver fibrosis markers were evaluated by the areas under the receiving operator characteristics curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. The prevalence of GEVs was 88% (104/118). The AUROCs for HA, LN, PIIINP, and CIV levels in predicting the presence of GEVs were 0.553 (95% CI: 0.458 to 0.644, P = 0.5668), 0.490 (95% CI: 0.397 to 0.584, P = 0.9065), 0.622 (95% CI: 0.528 to 0.710, P = 0.1099), and 0.560 (95% CI: 0.466 to 0.652, P = 0.4909). The PIIINP level at a cut-off value of 31.25 had a sensitivity of 73.1% and a specificity of 57.1%. Conclusions. The present study did not recommend HA, LN, PIIINP, and CIV levels to evaluate the presence of GEVs in liver cirrhosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46848552016-01-14 Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Qi, Xingshun Li, Hongyu Chen, Jiang Xia, Chunlian Peng, Ying Dai, Junna Hou, Yue Deng, Han Li, Jing Guo, Xiaozhong Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Background and Aims. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the role of hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and collagen IV (CIV) in predicting the presence of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Methods. We enrolled 118 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent the tests for the four serum liver fibrosis markers and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the same admissions. The predictive values of the four serum liver fibrosis markers were evaluated by the areas under the receiving operator characteristics curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. The prevalence of GEVs was 88% (104/118). The AUROCs for HA, LN, PIIINP, and CIV levels in predicting the presence of GEVs were 0.553 (95% CI: 0.458 to 0.644, P = 0.5668), 0.490 (95% CI: 0.397 to 0.584, P = 0.9065), 0.622 (95% CI: 0.528 to 0.710, P = 0.1099), and 0.560 (95% CI: 0.466 to 0.652, P = 0.4909). The PIIINP level at a cut-off value of 31.25 had a sensitivity of 73.1% and a specificity of 57.1%. Conclusions. The present study did not recommend HA, LN, PIIINP, and CIV levels to evaluate the presence of GEVs in liver cirrhosis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4684855/ /pubmed/26770190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/274534 Text en Copyright © 2015 Xingshun Qi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qi, Xingshun
Li, Hongyu
Chen, Jiang
Xia, Chunlian
Peng, Ying
Dai, Junna
Hou, Yue
Deng, Han
Li, Jing
Guo, Xiaozhong
Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Serum Liver Fibrosis Markers for Predicting the Presence of Gastroesophageal Varices in Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort serum liver fibrosis markers for predicting the presence of gastroesophageal varices in liver cirrhosis: a retrospective cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/274534
work_keys_str_mv AT qixingshun serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT lihongyu serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT chenjiang serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT xiachunlian serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT pengying serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT daijunna serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT houyue serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT denghan serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT lijing serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT guoxiaozhong serumliverfibrosismarkersforpredictingthepresenceofgastroesophagealvaricesinlivercirrhosisaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy