Cargando…

Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations

BACKGROUND: Access to specialty care remains a challenge for primary care providers and patients. Implementation of electronic referral and/or consultation (eCR) systems provides an opportunity for innovations in the delivery of specialty care. We conducted key informant interviews to identify drive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuot, Delphine S., Leeds, Kiren, Murphy, Elizabeth J., Sarkar, Urmimala, Lyles, Courtney R., Mekonnen, Tekeshe, Chen, Alice Hm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26687507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1
_version_ 1782406232979537920
author Tuot, Delphine S.
Leeds, Kiren
Murphy, Elizabeth J.
Sarkar, Urmimala
Lyles, Courtney R.
Mekonnen, Tekeshe
Chen, Alice Hm
author_facet Tuot, Delphine S.
Leeds, Kiren
Murphy, Elizabeth J.
Sarkar, Urmimala
Lyles, Courtney R.
Mekonnen, Tekeshe
Chen, Alice Hm
author_sort Tuot, Delphine S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Access to specialty care remains a challenge for primary care providers and patients. Implementation of electronic referral and/or consultation (eCR) systems provides an opportunity for innovations in the delivery of specialty care. We conducted key informant interviews to identify drivers, facilitators, barriers and evaluation metrics of diverse eCR systems to inform widespread implementation of this model of specialty care delivery. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with leaders of 16 diverse health care delivery organizations between January 2013 and April 2014. A limited snowball sampling approach was used for recruitment. Content analysis was used to examine key informant interview transcripts. RESULTS: Electronic referral systems, which provide referral management and triage by specialists, were developed to enhance tracking and operational efficiency. Electronic consultation systems, which encourage bi-directional communication between primary care and specialist providers facilitating longitudinal virtual co-management, were developed to improve access to specialty expertise. Integrated eCR systems leverage both functionalities to enhance the delivery of coordinated, specialty care at the population level. Elements of successful eCR system implementation included executive and clinician leadership, established funding models for specialist clinician reimbursement, and a commitment to optimizing clinician workflows. CONCLUSIONS: eCR systems have great potential to streamline access to and enhance the coordination of specialty care delivery. While different eCR models help solve different organizational challenges, all require institutional investments for successful implementation, such as funding for program management, leadership and clinician incentives. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46849272015-12-21 Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations Tuot, Delphine S. Leeds, Kiren Murphy, Elizabeth J. Sarkar, Urmimala Lyles, Courtney R. Mekonnen, Tekeshe Chen, Alice Hm BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Access to specialty care remains a challenge for primary care providers and patients. Implementation of electronic referral and/or consultation (eCR) systems provides an opportunity for innovations in the delivery of specialty care. We conducted key informant interviews to identify drivers, facilitators, barriers and evaluation metrics of diverse eCR systems to inform widespread implementation of this model of specialty care delivery. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with leaders of 16 diverse health care delivery organizations between January 2013 and April 2014. A limited snowball sampling approach was used for recruitment. Content analysis was used to examine key informant interview transcripts. RESULTS: Electronic referral systems, which provide referral management and triage by specialists, were developed to enhance tracking and operational efficiency. Electronic consultation systems, which encourage bi-directional communication between primary care and specialist providers facilitating longitudinal virtual co-management, were developed to improve access to specialty expertise. Integrated eCR systems leverage both functionalities to enhance the delivery of coordinated, specialty care at the population level. Elements of successful eCR system implementation included executive and clinician leadership, established funding models for specialist clinician reimbursement, and a commitment to optimizing clinician workflows. CONCLUSIONS: eCR systems have great potential to streamline access to and enhance the coordination of specialty care delivery. While different eCR models help solve different organizational challenges, all require institutional investments for successful implementation, such as funding for program management, leadership and clinician incentives. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4684927/ /pubmed/26687507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1 Text en © Tuot et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tuot, Delphine S.
Leeds, Kiren
Murphy, Elizabeth J.
Sarkar, Urmimala
Lyles, Courtney R.
Mekonnen, Tekeshe
Chen, Alice Hm
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
title Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
title_full Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
title_fullStr Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
title_full_unstemmed Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
title_short Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
title_sort facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26687507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tuotdelphines facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations
AT leedskiren facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations
AT murphyelizabethj facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations
AT sarkarurmimala facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations
AT lylescourtneyr facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations
AT mekonnentekeshe facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations
AT chenalicehm facilitatorsandbarrierstoimplementingelectronicreferralandorconsultationsystemsaqualitativestudyof16healthorganizations