Cargando…

Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Physical Activity (PA) during pregnancy has many health benefits, however, inactivity in this population is common and PA often declines with increasing gestation. PA consultations have been useful in promoting PA in the general population, however their use for addressing PA in pregnanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Currie, Sinead, Sinclair, Marlene, Liddle, Dianne S., Nevill, Alan, Murphy, Marie H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2548-x
_version_ 1782406233816301568
author Currie, Sinead
Sinclair, Marlene
Liddle, Dianne S.
Nevill, Alan
Murphy, Marie H.
author_facet Currie, Sinead
Sinclair, Marlene
Liddle, Dianne S.
Nevill, Alan
Murphy, Marie H.
author_sort Currie, Sinead
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical Activity (PA) during pregnancy has many health benefits, however, inactivity in this population is common and PA often declines with increasing gestation. PA consultations have been useful in promoting PA in the general population, however their use for addressing PA in pregnancy is unknown. This study aimed to examine if a theory-based intervention using PA consultations would reduce the magnitude of decline in objectively measured PA between the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS: A RCT was carried out in an urban maternity unit in Northern Ireland between September 2012 and June 2013. 109 low-risk, primigravida pregnant women were randomised to a control (n = 54) or intervention group (n = 55). Intervention participants received three face-to-face individual PA consultations. Daily PA was measured in each trimester using seven day accelerometry. The study was approved by a NHS trust (12/NI/0036). PA data in counts per minute (CPM) were categorised into intensity using Freedson cut points and mean minutes of PA were compared between groups using repeated measures ANOVA with a sub-analysis stratifying participants per PA level in trimester one. RESULTS: Intention to treat analysis was performed on data from 97 participants. Time in moderate, vigorous and moderate-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) significantly declined between trimesters one and three in both groups (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in PA between groups in any trimester. Women in the intervention group who were less active in trimester one did not demonstrate a significant decline in MVPA throughout pregnancy (in contrast with the decline identified in the more active participants). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that PA consultations were not effective in reducing the decline of MVPA in throughout pregnancy, however, women who were less active in trimester one and received PA consultations had a lesser decrease in MVPA. It is possible that pregnant women, specifically those who are more active at the start of pregnancy, have differing needs for PA behaviour change and maintenance, requiring more intense interventions than less active women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials Register ISRCTN61829137.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4684930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46849302015-12-21 Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial Currie, Sinead Sinclair, Marlene Liddle, Dianne S. Nevill, Alan Murphy, Marie H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical Activity (PA) during pregnancy has many health benefits, however, inactivity in this population is common and PA often declines with increasing gestation. PA consultations have been useful in promoting PA in the general population, however their use for addressing PA in pregnancy is unknown. This study aimed to examine if a theory-based intervention using PA consultations would reduce the magnitude of decline in objectively measured PA between the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. METHODS: A RCT was carried out in an urban maternity unit in Northern Ireland between September 2012 and June 2013. 109 low-risk, primigravida pregnant women were randomised to a control (n = 54) or intervention group (n = 55). Intervention participants received three face-to-face individual PA consultations. Daily PA was measured in each trimester using seven day accelerometry. The study was approved by a NHS trust (12/NI/0036). PA data in counts per minute (CPM) were categorised into intensity using Freedson cut points and mean minutes of PA were compared between groups using repeated measures ANOVA with a sub-analysis stratifying participants per PA level in trimester one. RESULTS: Intention to treat analysis was performed on data from 97 participants. Time in moderate, vigorous and moderate-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) significantly declined between trimesters one and three in both groups (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in PA between groups in any trimester. Women in the intervention group who were less active in trimester one did not demonstrate a significant decline in MVPA throughout pregnancy (in contrast with the decline identified in the more active participants). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that PA consultations were not effective in reducing the decline of MVPA in throughout pregnancy, however, women who were less active in trimester one and received PA consultations had a lesser decrease in MVPA. It is possible that pregnant women, specifically those who are more active at the start of pregnancy, have differing needs for PA behaviour change and maintenance, requiring more intense interventions than less active women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials Register ISRCTN61829137. BioMed Central 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4684930/ /pubmed/26686681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2548-x Text en © Currie et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Currie, Sinead
Sinclair, Marlene
Liddle, Dianne S.
Nevill, Alan
Murphy, Marie H.
Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
title Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4684930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2548-x
work_keys_str_mv AT curriesinead applicationofobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurementinanantenatalphysicalactivityconsultationinterventionarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sinclairmarlene applicationofobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurementinanantenatalphysicalactivityconsultationinterventionarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT liddlediannes applicationofobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurementinanantenatalphysicalactivityconsultationinterventionarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nevillalan applicationofobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurementinanantenatalphysicalactivityconsultationinterventionarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT murphymarieh applicationofobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurementinanantenatalphysicalactivityconsultationinterventionarandomisedcontrolledtrial