Cargando…
Frequency of Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) in Brazilian blood donors
BACKGROUND: Wr(a) is a low-incidence antigen, which is antithetical to the high prevalence red blood cell antigen, Wr(b). Anti-Wr(a) is a naturally occurring antibody that is found in approximately 1–2% of blood donors. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of Wr(a) and anti-Wr(a) in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4685090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26408365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.07.002 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Wr(a) is a low-incidence antigen, which is antithetical to the high prevalence red blood cell antigen, Wr(b). Anti-Wr(a) is a naturally occurring antibody that is found in approximately 1–2% of blood donors. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of Wr(a) and anti-Wr(a) in Brazilian blood donors. METHODS: A total of 1662 Brazilian blood donors were molecularly analyzed using the SNaPshot methodology to determine the WR*A/B alleles and to predict the frequency of the Wr(a) antigen. To detect the anti-Wr(a), samples from 1049 blood donors were analyzed using a gel test with Wr(a+) red blood cells. The serum was treated with dithiothreitol (DTT) to determine the immunoglobulin classes. Immunoglobulin (Ig)-G isotype classification was performed in a gel test using the IgG1/IgG3 card. A monocyte monolayer assay was employed to predict the clinical significance of IgG anti-Wr(a). RESULTS: Of the 1662 donors, only one sample had the DI*02.03 allele in heterozygous predicting the Wr(a+b+) phenotype. Anti-Wr(a) was detected in 34 (3.24%) samples, 64.7% in females and 35.3% in males. Regarding the immunoglobulin class, eight (23.5%) cases of anti-Wr(a) were classified as IgG and 26 (76.5%) as IgM. Of the eight cases of IgG anti-Wr(a), four were IgG1, two were IgG3 and three anti-Wr(a) were not IgG3 or IgG1, and thus probably IgG2 or IgG4. The results of the monocyte monolayer assay showed that IgG anti-Wr(a) might be of clinical significance. CONCLUSION: This study shows a very low frequency (0.06%) of the Wr(a) antigen in Brazilian blood donors. Additionally, it shows that the frequency of anti-Wr(a) in this population is higher than previously reported. |
---|