Cargando…

How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?

[Image: see text] Difficulties in estimating the correct number of lipids in each leaflet of complex bilayer membrane simulation systems make it inevitable to introduce a mismatch in lipid packing (i.e., area per lipid) and thus alter the lateral pressure of each leaflet. To investigate potential im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Soohyung, Beaven, Andrew H., Klauda, Jeffery B., Im, Wonpil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2015
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4685941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26575780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00232
_version_ 1782406378972774400
author Park, Soohyung
Beaven, Andrew H.
Klauda, Jeffery B.
Im, Wonpil
author_facet Park, Soohyung
Beaven, Andrew H.
Klauda, Jeffery B.
Im, Wonpil
author_sort Park, Soohyung
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Difficulties in estimating the correct number of lipids in each leaflet of complex bilayer membrane simulation systems make it inevitable to introduce a mismatch in lipid packing (i.e., area per lipid) and thus alter the lateral pressure of each leaflet. To investigate potential impacts of such mismatch on simulation results, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of saturated and monounsaturated lipid bilayers with and without gramicidin A or WALP23 at various mismatches by adjusting the number of lipids in the lower leaflet from no mismatch to a 25% reduction compared to that in the upper leaflet. All simulations were stable under the constant pressure barostat, but the mismatch induces asymmetric lipid packing between the leaflets, so that the upper leaflet becomes more ordered, and the lower leaflet becomes less ordered. The mismatch impacts on various bilayer properties are mild up to 5–10% mismatch, and bilayers with fully saturated chains appear to be more prone to these impacts than those with unsaturated tails. The nonvanishing leaflet surface tensions and the free energy derivatives with respect to the bilayer curvature indicate that the bilayer would be energetically unstable in the presence of mismatch. We propose a quantitative criterion for allowable mismatch based on the energetics derived from a continuum elastic model, which grows as a square root of the number of the lipids in the system. On the basis of this criterion, we infer that the area per lipid mismatch up to 5% would be tolerable in various membrane simulations of reasonable all-atom system sizes (40–160 lipids per leaflet).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4685941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46859412016-05-19 How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets? Park, Soohyung Beaven, Andrew H. Klauda, Jeffery B. Im, Wonpil J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] Difficulties in estimating the correct number of lipids in each leaflet of complex bilayer membrane simulation systems make it inevitable to introduce a mismatch in lipid packing (i.e., area per lipid) and thus alter the lateral pressure of each leaflet. To investigate potential impacts of such mismatch on simulation results, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of saturated and monounsaturated lipid bilayers with and without gramicidin A or WALP23 at various mismatches by adjusting the number of lipids in the lower leaflet from no mismatch to a 25% reduction compared to that in the upper leaflet. All simulations were stable under the constant pressure barostat, but the mismatch induces asymmetric lipid packing between the leaflets, so that the upper leaflet becomes more ordered, and the lower leaflet becomes less ordered. The mismatch impacts on various bilayer properties are mild up to 5–10% mismatch, and bilayers with fully saturated chains appear to be more prone to these impacts than those with unsaturated tails. The nonvanishing leaflet surface tensions and the free energy derivatives with respect to the bilayer curvature indicate that the bilayer would be energetically unstable in the presence of mismatch. We propose a quantitative criterion for allowable mismatch based on the energetics derived from a continuum elastic model, which grows as a square root of the number of the lipids in the system. On the basis of this criterion, we infer that the area per lipid mismatch up to 5% would be tolerable in various membrane simulations of reasonable all-atom system sizes (40–160 lipids per leaflet). American Chemical Society 2015-05-19 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4685941/ /pubmed/26575780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00232 Text en Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Park, Soohyung
Beaven, Andrew H.
Klauda, Jeffery B.
Im, Wonpil
How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?
title How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?
title_full How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?
title_fullStr How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?
title_full_unstemmed How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?
title_short How Tolerant are Membrane Simulations with Mismatch in Area per Lipid between Leaflets?
title_sort how tolerant are membrane simulations with mismatch in area per lipid between leaflets?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4685941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26575780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00232
work_keys_str_mv AT parksoohyung howtolerantaremembranesimulationswithmismatchinareaperlipidbetweenleaflets
AT beavenandrewh howtolerantaremembranesimulationswithmismatchinareaperlipidbetweenleaflets
AT klaudajefferyb howtolerantaremembranesimulationswithmismatchinareaperlipidbetweenleaflets
AT imwonpil howtolerantaremembranesimulationswithmismatchinareaperlipidbetweenleaflets