Cargando…
A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data
Similarity or distance measures are core components used by distance-based clustering algorithms to cluster similar data points into the same clusters, while dissimilar or distant data points are placed into different clusters. The performance of similarity measures is mostly addressed in two or thr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4686108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144059 |
_version_ | 1782406409345826816 |
---|---|
author | Shirkhorshidi, Ali Seyed Aghabozorgi, Saeed Wah, Teh Ying |
author_facet | Shirkhorshidi, Ali Seyed Aghabozorgi, Saeed Wah, Teh Ying |
author_sort | Shirkhorshidi, Ali Seyed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Similarity or distance measures are core components used by distance-based clustering algorithms to cluster similar data points into the same clusters, while dissimilar or distant data points are placed into different clusters. The performance of similarity measures is mostly addressed in two or three-dimensional spaces, beyond which, to the best of our knowledge, there is no empirical study that has revealed the behavior of similarity measures when dealing with high-dimensional datasets. To fill this gap, a technical framework is proposed in this study to analyze, compare and benchmark the influence of different similarity measures on the results of distance-based clustering algorithms. For reproducibility purposes, fifteen publicly available datasets were used for this study, and consequently, future distance measures can be evaluated and compared with the results of the measures discussed in this work. These datasets were classified as low and high-dimensional categories to study the performance of each measure against each category. This research should help the research community to identify suitable distance measures for datasets and also to facilitate a comparison and evaluation of the newly proposed similarity or distance measures with traditional ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4686108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46861082016-01-07 A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data Shirkhorshidi, Ali Seyed Aghabozorgi, Saeed Wah, Teh Ying PLoS One Research Article Similarity or distance measures are core components used by distance-based clustering algorithms to cluster similar data points into the same clusters, while dissimilar or distant data points are placed into different clusters. The performance of similarity measures is mostly addressed in two or three-dimensional spaces, beyond which, to the best of our knowledge, there is no empirical study that has revealed the behavior of similarity measures when dealing with high-dimensional datasets. To fill this gap, a technical framework is proposed in this study to analyze, compare and benchmark the influence of different similarity measures on the results of distance-based clustering algorithms. For reproducibility purposes, fifteen publicly available datasets were used for this study, and consequently, future distance measures can be evaluated and compared with the results of the measures discussed in this work. These datasets were classified as low and high-dimensional categories to study the performance of each measure against each category. This research should help the research community to identify suitable distance measures for datasets and also to facilitate a comparison and evaluation of the newly proposed similarity or distance measures with traditional ones. Public Library of Science 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4686108/ /pubmed/26658987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144059 Text en © 2015 Shirkhorshidi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shirkhorshidi, Ali Seyed Aghabozorgi, Saeed Wah, Teh Ying A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data |
title | A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data |
title_full | A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data |
title_fullStr | A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data |
title_short | A Comparison Study on Similarity and Dissimilarity Measures in Clustering Continuous Data |
title_sort | comparison study on similarity and dissimilarity measures in clustering continuous data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4686108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirkhorshidialiseyed acomparisonstudyonsimilarityanddissimilaritymeasuresinclusteringcontinuousdata AT aghabozorgisaeed acomparisonstudyonsimilarityanddissimilaritymeasuresinclusteringcontinuousdata AT wahtehying acomparisonstudyonsimilarityanddissimilaritymeasuresinclusteringcontinuousdata AT shirkhorshidialiseyed comparisonstudyonsimilarityanddissimilaritymeasuresinclusteringcontinuousdata AT aghabozorgisaeed comparisonstudyonsimilarityanddissimilaritymeasuresinclusteringcontinuousdata AT wahtehying comparisonstudyonsimilarityanddissimilaritymeasuresinclusteringcontinuousdata |