Cargando…

Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes

BACKGROUND: Recently fibroblasts of many mammalian species have been reprogrammed to pluripotent state using overexpression of several transcription factors. This technology allows production of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells with properties similar to embryonic stem (ES) cells. The completene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menzorov, Aleksei G, Matveeva, Natalia M, Markakis, Marios N, Fishman, Venyamin S, Christensen, Knud, Khabarova, Anna A, Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E, Kizilova, Elena A, Cirera, Susanna, Anistoroaei, Razvan, Serov, Oleg L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4686781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S13-S6
_version_ 1782406496690110464
author Menzorov, Aleksei G
Matveeva, Natalia M
Markakis, Marios N
Fishman, Venyamin S
Christensen, Knud
Khabarova, Anna A
Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E
Kizilova, Elena A
Cirera, Susanna
Anistoroaei, Razvan
Serov, Oleg L
author_facet Menzorov, Aleksei G
Matveeva, Natalia M
Markakis, Marios N
Fishman, Venyamin S
Christensen, Knud
Khabarova, Anna A
Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E
Kizilova, Elena A
Cirera, Susanna
Anistoroaei, Razvan
Serov, Oleg L
author_sort Menzorov, Aleksei G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently fibroblasts of many mammalian species have been reprogrammed to pluripotent state using overexpression of several transcription factors. This technology allows production of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells with properties similar to embryonic stem (ES) cells. The completeness of reprogramming process is well studied in such species as mouse and human but there is not enough data on other species. We produced American mink (Neovison vison) ES and iPS cells and compared these cells using transcriptome analysis. RESULTS: We report the generation of 10 mink ES and 22 iPS cell lines. The majority of the analyzed cell lines had normal diploid chromosome number. The only ES cell line with XX chromosome set had both X-chromosomes in active state that is characteristic of pluripotent cells. The pluripotency of ES and iPS cell lines was confirmed by formation of teratomas with cell types representing all three germ layers. Transcriptome analysis of mink embryonic fibroblasts (EF), two ES and two iPS cell lines allowed us to identify 11831 assembled contigs which were annotated. These led to a number of 6891 unique genes. Of these 3201 were differentially expressed between mink EF and ES cells. We analyzed expression levels of these genes in iPS cell lines. This allowed us to show that 80% of genes were correctly reprogrammed in iPS cells, whereas approximately 6% had an intermediate expression pattern, about 7% were not reprogrammed and about 5% had a "novel" expression pattern. We observed expression of pluripotency marker genes such as Oct4, Sox2 and Rex1 in ES and iPS cell lines with notable exception of Nanog. CONCLUSIONS: We had produced and characterized American mink ES and iPS cells. These cells were pluripotent by a number of criteria and iPS cells exhibited effective reprogramming. Interestingly, we had showed lack of Nanog expression and consider it as a species-specific feature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4686781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46867812015-12-31 Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes Menzorov, Aleksei G Matveeva, Natalia M Markakis, Marios N Fishman, Venyamin S Christensen, Knud Khabarova, Anna A Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E Kizilova, Elena A Cirera, Susanna Anistoroaei, Razvan Serov, Oleg L BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Recently fibroblasts of many mammalian species have been reprogrammed to pluripotent state using overexpression of several transcription factors. This technology allows production of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells with properties similar to embryonic stem (ES) cells. The completeness of reprogramming process is well studied in such species as mouse and human but there is not enough data on other species. We produced American mink (Neovison vison) ES and iPS cells and compared these cells using transcriptome analysis. RESULTS: We report the generation of 10 mink ES and 22 iPS cell lines. The majority of the analyzed cell lines had normal diploid chromosome number. The only ES cell line with XX chromosome set had both X-chromosomes in active state that is characteristic of pluripotent cells. The pluripotency of ES and iPS cell lines was confirmed by formation of teratomas with cell types representing all three germ layers. Transcriptome analysis of mink embryonic fibroblasts (EF), two ES and two iPS cell lines allowed us to identify 11831 assembled contigs which were annotated. These led to a number of 6891 unique genes. Of these 3201 were differentially expressed between mink EF and ES cells. We analyzed expression levels of these genes in iPS cell lines. This allowed us to show that 80% of genes were correctly reprogrammed in iPS cells, whereas approximately 6% had an intermediate expression pattern, about 7% were not reprogrammed and about 5% had a "novel" expression pattern. We observed expression of pluripotency marker genes such as Oct4, Sox2 and Rex1 in ES and iPS cell lines with notable exception of Nanog. CONCLUSIONS: We had produced and characterized American mink ES and iPS cells. These cells were pluripotent by a number of criteria and iPS cells exhibited effective reprogramming. Interestingly, we had showed lack of Nanog expression and consider it as a species-specific feature. BioMed Central 2015-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4686781/ /pubmed/26694224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S13-S6 Text en Copyright © 2015 Menzorov et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Menzorov, Aleksei G
Matveeva, Natalia M
Markakis, Marios N
Fishman, Venyamin S
Christensen, Knud
Khabarova, Anna A
Pristyazhnyuk, Inna E
Kizilova, Elena A
Cirera, Susanna
Anistoroaei, Razvan
Serov, Oleg L
Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
title Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
title_full Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
title_fullStr Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
title_short Comparison of American mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
title_sort comparison of american mink embryonic stem and induced pluripotent stem cell transcriptomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4686781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S13-S6
work_keys_str_mv AT menzorovalekseig comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT matveevanataliam comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT markakismariosn comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT fishmanvenyamins comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT christensenknud comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT khabarovaannaa comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT pristyazhnyukinnae comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT kizilovaelenaa comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT cirerasusanna comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT anistoroaeirazvan comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes
AT serovolegl comparisonofamericanminkembryonicstemandinducedpluripotentstemcelltranscriptomes