Cargando…
Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities
BACKGROUND: The Physician Quality Improvement Initiative (PQII) uses a well-established multi-source feedback program, and incorporates an additional facilitated feedback review with their department chief. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to examine the value of the PQII by eliciting fee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0511-2 |
_version_ | 1782406573600014336 |
---|---|
author | Wentlandt, Kirsten Bracaglia, Andrea Drummond, James Handren, Lindsay McCann, Joshua Clarke, Catherine Degendorfer, Niki Chan, Charles K. |
author_facet | Wentlandt, Kirsten Bracaglia, Andrea Drummond, James Handren, Lindsay McCann, Joshua Clarke, Catherine Degendorfer, Niki Chan, Charles K. |
author_sort | Wentlandt, Kirsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Physician Quality Improvement Initiative (PQII) uses a well-established multi-source feedback program, and incorporates an additional facilitated feedback review with their department chief. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to examine the value of the PQII by eliciting feedback from various stakeholders. METHODS: All participants and department chiefs (n = 45) were invited to provide feedback on the project implementation and outcomes via survey and/or an interview. The survey consisted of 12 questions focused on the value of the PQII, it’s influence on practice and the promotion of quality improvement and accountability. RESULTS: A total of 5 chiefs and 12 physician participants completed semi structured interviews. Participants found the PQII process, report and review session helpful, self-affirming or an opportunity for self-reflection, and an opportunity to engage their leaders about their practice. Chiefs indicated the sessions strengthened their understanding, ability to communicate and engage physicians about their practice, best practices, quality improvement and accountability. Thirty participants (66.7 %) completed the survey; of the responders 75.9, 89.7, 86.7 % found patient, co-worker, and physician colleague feedback valuable, respectively. A total of 67.9 % valued their facilitated review with their chief and 55.2 % indicated they were contemplating change due to their feedback. Participants believed the PQII promoted quality improvement (27/30, 90.0 %), and accountability (28/30, 93.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: The PQII provides an opportunity for physician development, affirmation and reflection, but also a structure to further departmental quality improvement, best practices, and finally, an opportunity to enhance communication, accountability and relationships between the organization, department chiefs and their staff. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4687152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46871522015-12-23 Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities Wentlandt, Kirsten Bracaglia, Andrea Drummond, James Handren, Lindsay McCann, Joshua Clarke, Catherine Degendorfer, Niki Chan, Charles K. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The Physician Quality Improvement Initiative (PQII) uses a well-established multi-source feedback program, and incorporates an additional facilitated feedback review with their department chief. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to examine the value of the PQII by eliciting feedback from various stakeholders. METHODS: All participants and department chiefs (n = 45) were invited to provide feedback on the project implementation and outcomes via survey and/or an interview. The survey consisted of 12 questions focused on the value of the PQII, it’s influence on practice and the promotion of quality improvement and accountability. RESULTS: A total of 5 chiefs and 12 physician participants completed semi structured interviews. Participants found the PQII process, report and review session helpful, self-affirming or an opportunity for self-reflection, and an opportunity to engage their leaders about their practice. Chiefs indicated the sessions strengthened their understanding, ability to communicate and engage physicians about their practice, best practices, quality improvement and accountability. Thirty participants (66.7 %) completed the survey; of the responders 75.9, 89.7, 86.7 % found patient, co-worker, and physician colleague feedback valuable, respectively. A total of 67.9 % valued their facilitated review with their chief and 55.2 % indicated they were contemplating change due to their feedback. Participants believed the PQII promoted quality improvement (27/30, 90.0 %), and accountability (28/30, 93.3 %). CONCLUSIONS: The PQII provides an opportunity for physician development, affirmation and reflection, but also a structure to further departmental quality improvement, best practices, and finally, an opportunity to enhance communication, accountability and relationships between the organization, department chiefs and their staff. BioMed Central 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4687152/ /pubmed/26694493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0511-2 Text en © Wentlandt et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wentlandt, Kirsten Bracaglia, Andrea Drummond, James Handren, Lindsay McCann, Joshua Clarke, Catherine Degendorfer, Niki Chan, Charles K. Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
title | Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
title_full | Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
title_short | Evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
title_sort | evaluation of the physician quality improvement initiative: the expected and unexpected opportunities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0511-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wentlandtkirsten evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT bracagliaandrea evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT drummondjames evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT handrenlindsay evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT mccannjoshua evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT clarkecatherine evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT degendorferniki evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities AT chancharlesk evaluationofthephysicianqualityimprovementinitiativetheexpectedandunexpectedopportunities |