Cargando…

Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate fluid therapy during surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the effects of particular types of fluids (crystalloid or colloid solutions) in surgical patients, especially with the goal of hemodynamic optimization. Isotonic s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Futier, Emmanuel, Biais, Matthieu, Godet, Thomas, Bernard, Lise, Rolhion, Christine, Bourdier, Justine, Morand, Dominique, Pereira, Bruno, Jaber, Samir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1085-3
_version_ 1782406603321901056
author Futier, Emmanuel
Biais, Matthieu
Godet, Thomas
Bernard, Lise
Rolhion, Christine
Bourdier, Justine
Morand, Dominique
Pereira, Bruno
Jaber, Samir
author_facet Futier, Emmanuel
Biais, Matthieu
Godet, Thomas
Bernard, Lise
Rolhion, Christine
Bourdier, Justine
Morand, Dominique
Pereira, Bruno
Jaber, Samir
author_sort Futier, Emmanuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inappropriate fluid therapy during surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the effects of particular types of fluids (crystalloid or colloid solutions) in surgical patients, especially with the goal of hemodynamic optimization. Isotonic saline is the most commonly used fluid worldwide but may be associated with potential nephrotoxicity. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are widely used in surgical patients as a component of goal-directed fluid optimization strategies, but several large multicenter studies have suggested increased rates of acute kidney injury and adverse events with the use of HES in ICU patients. Despite what may be inferred from physiological studies, the benefit and harm of 0.9 % saline and HES during hemodynamic therapy have not been clearly established in surgical patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The FLASH trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, two-arm trial, randomizing 826 patients with moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications to receive 6 % HES 130/0.4 or 0.9 % saline during individualized goal-directed fluid optimization. The primary outcome measure is a composite of death or major postoperative complications within 14 days following surgery. The sample size will allow the detection of a 10 % absolute between-group difference in the primary outcome measure with a type 1 error rate of 5 % and power of 95 %, assuming a 5 % mortality rate and 20 % morbidity (thus 25 % for the composite endpoint). DISCUSSION: The FLASH trial may provide important data on the efficacy and safety of commonly used fluid solutions and could have a significant impact on future treatment of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02502773. Registered 16 June 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1085-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46872832015-12-23 Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Futier, Emmanuel Biais, Matthieu Godet, Thomas Bernard, Lise Rolhion, Christine Bourdier, Justine Morand, Dominique Pereira, Bruno Jaber, Samir Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Inappropriate fluid therapy during surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the effects of particular types of fluids (crystalloid or colloid solutions) in surgical patients, especially with the goal of hemodynamic optimization. Isotonic saline is the most commonly used fluid worldwide but may be associated with potential nephrotoxicity. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are widely used in surgical patients as a component of goal-directed fluid optimization strategies, but several large multicenter studies have suggested increased rates of acute kidney injury and adverse events with the use of HES in ICU patients. Despite what may be inferred from physiological studies, the benefit and harm of 0.9 % saline and HES during hemodynamic therapy have not been clearly established in surgical patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The FLASH trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, two-arm trial, randomizing 826 patients with moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications to receive 6 % HES 130/0.4 or 0.9 % saline during individualized goal-directed fluid optimization. The primary outcome measure is a composite of death or major postoperative complications within 14 days following surgery. The sample size will allow the detection of a 10 % absolute between-group difference in the primary outcome measure with a type 1 error rate of 5 % and power of 95 %, assuming a 5 % mortality rate and 20 % morbidity (thus 25 % for the composite endpoint). DISCUSSION: The FLASH trial may provide important data on the efficacy and safety of commonly used fluid solutions and could have a significant impact on future treatment of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02502773. Registered 16 June 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1085-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4687283/ /pubmed/26690683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1085-3 Text en © Futier et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Futier, Emmanuel
Biais, Matthieu
Godet, Thomas
Bernard, Lise
Rolhion, Christine
Bourdier, Justine
Morand, Dominique
Pereira, Bruno
Jaber, Samir
Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (FLASH Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort fluid loading in abdominal surgery - saline versus hydroxyethyl starch (flash trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1085-3
work_keys_str_mv AT futieremmanuel fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT biaismatthieu fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT godetthomas fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bernardlise fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rolhionchristine fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bourdierjustine fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moranddominique fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pereirabruno fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jabersamir fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fluidloadinginabdominalsurgerysalineversushydroxyethylstarchflashtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial