Cargando…

The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management

BACKGROUND: The Tasmanian devil, the world’s largest carnivorous marsupial, is at risk of extinction due to devil facial tumour disease (DFTD), a fatal contagious cancer. The Save the Tasmanian Devil Program has established an insurance population, which currently holds over 600 devils in captive fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Yuanyuan, Fox, Samantha, Pemberton, David, Hogg, Carolyn, Papenfuss, Anthony T., Belov, Katherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0143-0
_version_ 1782406612013547520
author Cheng, Yuanyuan
Fox, Samantha
Pemberton, David
Hogg, Carolyn
Papenfuss, Anthony T.
Belov, Katherine
author_facet Cheng, Yuanyuan
Fox, Samantha
Pemberton, David
Hogg, Carolyn
Papenfuss, Anthony T.
Belov, Katherine
author_sort Cheng, Yuanyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Tasmanian devil, the world’s largest carnivorous marsupial, is at risk of extinction due to devil facial tumour disease (DFTD), a fatal contagious cancer. The Save the Tasmanian Devil Program has established an insurance population, which currently holds over 600 devils in captive facilities across Australia. Microbes are known to play a crucial role in the health and well-being of humans and other animals, and increasing evidence suggests that changes in the microbiota can influence various aspects of host physiology and development. To improve our understanding of devils and facilitate management and conservation of the species, we characterised the microbiome of wild devils and investigated differences in the composition of microbial community between captive and wild individuals. RESULTS: A total of 1,223,550 bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences were generated via Roche 454 sequencing from 56 samples, including 17 gut, 15 skin, 18 pouch and 6 oral samples. The devil’s gut microbiome was dominated by Firmicutes and showed a high Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, which appears to be a common feature of many carnivorous mammals. Metabolisms of carbohydrates, amino acids, energy, cofactors and vitamins, nucleotides and lipids were predicted as the most prominent metabolic pathways that the devil's gut flora contributed to. The microbiota inside the female’s pouch outside lactation was highly similar to that of the skin, both co-dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The oral microbiome had similar proportions of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Fusobacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Compositional differences were observed in all four types of microbiota between devils from captive and wild populations. Certain captive devils had significantly lower levels of gut bacterial diversity than wild individuals, and the two groups differed in the proportion of gut bacteria accounting for the metabolism of glycan, amino acids and cofactors and vitamins. Further studies are underway to investigate whether alterations in the microbiome of captive devils can have impacts on their ability to adapt and survive following re-introduction to the wild. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-015-0143-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46873212015-12-23 The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management Cheng, Yuanyuan Fox, Samantha Pemberton, David Hogg, Carolyn Papenfuss, Anthony T. Belov, Katherine Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: The Tasmanian devil, the world’s largest carnivorous marsupial, is at risk of extinction due to devil facial tumour disease (DFTD), a fatal contagious cancer. The Save the Tasmanian Devil Program has established an insurance population, which currently holds over 600 devils in captive facilities across Australia. Microbes are known to play a crucial role in the health and well-being of humans and other animals, and increasing evidence suggests that changes in the microbiota can influence various aspects of host physiology and development. To improve our understanding of devils and facilitate management and conservation of the species, we characterised the microbiome of wild devils and investigated differences in the composition of microbial community between captive and wild individuals. RESULTS: A total of 1,223,550 bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences were generated via Roche 454 sequencing from 56 samples, including 17 gut, 15 skin, 18 pouch and 6 oral samples. The devil’s gut microbiome was dominated by Firmicutes and showed a high Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, which appears to be a common feature of many carnivorous mammals. Metabolisms of carbohydrates, amino acids, energy, cofactors and vitamins, nucleotides and lipids were predicted as the most prominent metabolic pathways that the devil's gut flora contributed to. The microbiota inside the female’s pouch outside lactation was highly similar to that of the skin, both co-dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The oral microbiome had similar proportions of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Fusobacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Compositional differences were observed in all four types of microbiota between devils from captive and wild populations. Certain captive devils had significantly lower levels of gut bacterial diversity than wild individuals, and the two groups differed in the proportion of gut bacteria accounting for the metabolism of glycan, amino acids and cofactors and vitamins. Further studies are underway to investigate whether alterations in the microbiome of captive devils can have impacts on their ability to adapt and survive following re-introduction to the wild. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-015-0143-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4687321/ /pubmed/26689946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0143-0 Text en © Cheng et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cheng, Yuanyuan
Fox, Samantha
Pemberton, David
Hogg, Carolyn
Papenfuss, Anthony T.
Belov, Katherine
The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
title The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
title_full The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
title_fullStr The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
title_full_unstemmed The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
title_short The Tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
title_sort tasmanian devil microbiome—implications for conservation and management
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0143-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chengyuanyuan thetasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT foxsamantha thetasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT pembertondavid thetasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT hoggcarolyn thetasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT papenfussanthonyt thetasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT belovkatherine thetasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT chengyuanyuan tasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT foxsamantha tasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT pembertondavid tasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT hoggcarolyn tasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT papenfussanthonyt tasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement
AT belovkatherine tasmaniandevilmicrobiomeimplicationsforconservationandmanagement