Cargando…

The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the morbidity and efficacy of repeat cryoablation (CA) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with median age of 71 years (range 48–80) who underwent repeat CA between April 2003 and April 2011 at a single institut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mustafa, Mahmoud, Delacroix, Scott, Ward, John F., Pisters, Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26691335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0753-9
_version_ 1782406617027837952
author Mustafa, Mahmoud
Delacroix, Scott
Ward, John F.
Pisters, Louis
author_facet Mustafa, Mahmoud
Delacroix, Scott
Ward, John F.
Pisters, Louis
author_sort Mustafa, Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the morbidity and efficacy of repeat cryoablation (CA) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with median age of 71 years (range 48–80) who underwent repeat CA between April 2003 and April 2011 at a single institution were included. The median initial prostate-specific antigens (PSA) and Gleason values were 6.2 ng/ml (range 4–23.6) and 7 (range 6–9), respectively. Twenty-four patients underwent two CA treatments, and three patients underwent three CA treatments. Pre- and perioperative parameters and oncological and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: No intraoperative complications occurred. After the first CA, PSA was undetectable in 10 patients, and the median nadir PSA value was 0.65 ng/ml (range 0.1–4.9). After the second CA, 4 patients had undetectable PSA, and the median nadir PSA value was 1.25 ng/ml (range 0.2–7.9). For patients who underwent a third CA treatment, no patients had undetectable PSA, and the subsequent median nadir PSA value was 1.6 ng/ml (range 0.4–4.5). Two patients had incontinence (1 pad per day) following repeat CA. One patient had urinary retention after the third CA treatment, and one had urethral stricture. The mean hospitalization and follow-up periods were 1 day (range 0–2) and 51.5 months (range 11–96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat CA successfully reduced PSA levels, and complications were modest. We conclude that repeat CA is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46873442015-12-23 The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer Mustafa, Mahmoud Delacroix, Scott Ward, John F. Pisters, Louis World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the morbidity and efficacy of repeat cryoablation (CA) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with median age of 71 years (range 48–80) who underwent repeat CA between April 2003 and April 2011 at a single institution were included. The median initial prostate-specific antigens (PSA) and Gleason values were 6.2 ng/ml (range 4–23.6) and 7 (range 6–9), respectively. Twenty-four patients underwent two CA treatments, and three patients underwent three CA treatments. Pre- and perioperative parameters and oncological and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: No intraoperative complications occurred. After the first CA, PSA was undetectable in 10 patients, and the median nadir PSA value was 0.65 ng/ml (range 0.1–4.9). After the second CA, 4 patients had undetectable PSA, and the median nadir PSA value was 1.25 ng/ml (range 0.2–7.9). For patients who underwent a third CA treatment, no patients had undetectable PSA, and the subsequent median nadir PSA value was 1.6 ng/ml (range 0.4–4.5). Two patients had incontinence (1 pad per day) following repeat CA. One patient had urinary retention after the third CA treatment, and one had urethral stricture. The mean hospitalization and follow-up periods were 1 day (range 0–2) and 51.5 months (range 11–96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat CA successfully reduced PSA levels, and complications were modest. We conclude that repeat CA is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer. BioMed Central 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4687344/ /pubmed/26691335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0753-9 Text en © Mustafa et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mustafa, Mahmoud
Delacroix, Scott
Ward, John F.
Pisters, Louis
The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
title The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
title_full The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
title_short The feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
title_sort feasibility and safety of repeat cryosurgical ablation of localized prostate cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26691335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0753-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafamahmoud thefeasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT delacroixscott thefeasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT wardjohnf thefeasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT pisterslouis thefeasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT mustafamahmoud feasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT delacroixscott feasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT wardjohnf feasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer
AT pisterslouis feasibilityandsafetyofrepeatcryosurgicalablationoflocalizedprostatecancer