Cargando…

Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions

OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ views on the EuroQol-5D and Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire, tools currently used for collecting patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service. The key questions were as follows: (1) whether patients consider them sensitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matata, Bashir M, Hinder, Susan, Steele, Sharon, Gibbons, Elizabeth, Jackson, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312113503956
_version_ 1782406666564665344
author Matata, Bashir M
Hinder, Susan
Steele, Sharon
Gibbons, Elizabeth
Jackson, Mark
author_facet Matata, Bashir M
Hinder, Susan
Steele, Sharon
Gibbons, Elizabeth
Jackson, Mark
author_sort Matata, Bashir M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ views on the EuroQol-5D and Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire, tools currently used for collecting patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service. The key questions were as follows: (1) whether patients consider them sensitive enough to detect change in their health after cardiovascular disease interventions and (2) whether they consider the health-related quality-of-life questions as meaningful. METHODS: Data were collected on patients’ views using focus groups. We held four focus groups selecting participants on the basis of their baseline and follow-up EuroQol-5D scores. Data were analysed using framework analysis and grounded theory. RESULTS: Focus group participants confirmed that they had derived substantial health benefits from their cardiac interventions despite the lack of measurable effects on the EuroQol-5D scores. Participants felt that the EuroQol-5D questionnaire was limited because of the following reasons: Their health fluctuates from day to day. They had difficulty assessing their general health status on the visual analogue scale. They felt that the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire was limited because of the following reasons: They did not understand the clinical terms used. The impact of tiredness on their quality of life was not captured. They were unable to distinguish between the effects of their heart condition and other health issues. Additionally, neither questionnaire considers the adjustments people have made to their domestic arrangements to improve their health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the two questionnaires do not capture some aspects of health that patients consider important. Furthermore, the presence of co-morbidities masks the symptoms relating to the heart disease and the effect of their cardiac interventions. Future work on patient-reported outcome measures should consider developing new questionnaires that address these major concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46877622016-01-14 Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions Matata, Bashir M Hinder, Susan Steele, Sharon Gibbons, Elizabeth Jackson, Mark SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: To explore patients’ views on the EuroQol-5D and Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire, tools currently used for collecting patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service. The key questions were as follows: (1) whether patients consider them sensitive enough to detect change in their health after cardiovascular disease interventions and (2) whether they consider the health-related quality-of-life questions as meaningful. METHODS: Data were collected on patients’ views using focus groups. We held four focus groups selecting participants on the basis of their baseline and follow-up EuroQol-5D scores. Data were analysed using framework analysis and grounded theory. RESULTS: Focus group participants confirmed that they had derived substantial health benefits from their cardiac interventions despite the lack of measurable effects on the EuroQol-5D scores. Participants felt that the EuroQol-5D questionnaire was limited because of the following reasons: Their health fluctuates from day to day. They had difficulty assessing their general health status on the visual analogue scale. They felt that the Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire was limited because of the following reasons: They did not understand the clinical terms used. The impact of tiredness on their quality of life was not captured. They were unable to distinguish between the effects of their heart condition and other health issues. Additionally, neither questionnaire considers the adjustments people have made to their domestic arrangements to improve their health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the two questionnaires do not capture some aspects of health that patients consider important. Furthermore, the presence of co-morbidities masks the symptoms relating to the heart disease and the effect of their cardiac interventions. Future work on patient-reported outcome measures should consider developing new questionnaires that address these major concerns. SAGE Publications 2013-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4687762/ /pubmed/26770681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312113503956 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Original Article
Matata, Bashir M
Hinder, Susan
Steele, Sharon
Gibbons, Elizabeth
Jackson, Mark
Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
title Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
title_full Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
title_fullStr Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
title_short Patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the English National Health Service: A qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
title_sort patients’ attitudes and perceptions of two health-related quality-of-life questionnaires used to collect patient-reported outcome measures in the english national health service: a qualitative study of patients undergoing cardiac interventions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26770681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312113503956
work_keys_str_mv AT matatabashirm patientsattitudesandperceptionsoftwohealthrelatedqualityoflifequestionnairesusedtocollectpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresintheenglishnationalhealthserviceaqualitativestudyofpatientsundergoingcardiacinterventions
AT hindersusan patientsattitudesandperceptionsoftwohealthrelatedqualityoflifequestionnairesusedtocollectpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresintheenglishnationalhealthserviceaqualitativestudyofpatientsundergoingcardiacinterventions
AT steelesharon patientsattitudesandperceptionsoftwohealthrelatedqualityoflifequestionnairesusedtocollectpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresintheenglishnationalhealthserviceaqualitativestudyofpatientsundergoingcardiacinterventions
AT gibbonselizabeth patientsattitudesandperceptionsoftwohealthrelatedqualityoflifequestionnairesusedtocollectpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresintheenglishnationalhealthserviceaqualitativestudyofpatientsundergoingcardiacinterventions
AT jacksonmark patientsattitudesandperceptionsoftwohealthrelatedqualityoflifequestionnairesusedtocollectpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresintheenglishnationalhealthserviceaqualitativestudyofpatientsundergoingcardiacinterventions