Cargando…

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common procedure in both professional and high-level athletes. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of technique and level of play with UCLR on return to sport (RTS). HYPOTHESIS: When comparing different surgical techniques or preoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erickson, Brandon J., Chalmers, Peter N., Bush-Joseph, Charles A., Verma, Nikhil N., Romeo, Anthony A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
72
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26740956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115618914
_version_ 1782406674140626944
author Erickson, Brandon J.
Chalmers, Peter N.
Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Romeo, Anthony A.
author_facet Erickson, Brandon J.
Chalmers, Peter N.
Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Romeo, Anthony A.
author_sort Erickson, Brandon J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common procedure in both professional and high-level athletes. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of technique and level of play with UCLR on return to sport (RTS). HYPOTHESIS: When comparing different surgical techniques or preoperative level of sports participation, there is no difference in rate of RTS after UCLR. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using 3 publicly available free databases. Therapeutic clinical outcome investigations reporting UCLR outcomes with level of evidence 1 through 4 were eligible for inclusion. All study, subject, and surgical technique demographics were analyzed and compared between continents and countries. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and 2-proportion 2-sample z-test calculators with α = .05 were used to compare RTS between level of play and technique. RESULTS: Twenty studies (2019 patients/elbows; mean age, 22.13 ± 4 years; 97% male; mean follow-up, 39.9 ± 16.2 months) were included. The majority of patients were baseball players (94.5%), specifically pitchers (80%). The most common level of play was collegiate (44.6%). Palmaris longus (71.2%) and the American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) technique (65.6%) were the most common graft choice and surgical technique, respectively. There was a pooled 86.2% RTS rate, and 90% of players scored excellent/good on the Conway-Jobe scale. RTS rates were higher among collegiate athletes (95.5%) than either high school (89.4%, P = .023) or professional athletes (86.4%, P < .0001). RTS rates were higher for the docking technique (97.0%, P = .001) and the ASMI technique (93.3%, P = .0034) than the Jobe technique (66.7%). CONCLUSION: UCLR is performed most commonly in collegiate athletes. Collegiate athletes have the highest RTS rate after UCLR of all levels of competition. The docking and ASMI techniques had higher RTS rates than the Jobe technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46878312016-01-06 Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature Erickson, Brandon J. Chalmers, Peter N. Bush-Joseph, Charles A. Verma, Nikhil N. Romeo, Anthony A. Orthop J Sports Med 72 BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common procedure in both professional and high-level athletes. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of technique and level of play with UCLR on return to sport (RTS). HYPOTHESIS: When comparing different surgical techniques or preoperative level of sports participation, there is no difference in rate of RTS after UCLR. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using 3 publicly available free databases. Therapeutic clinical outcome investigations reporting UCLR outcomes with level of evidence 1 through 4 were eligible for inclusion. All study, subject, and surgical technique demographics were analyzed and compared between continents and countries. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and 2-proportion 2-sample z-test calculators with α = .05 were used to compare RTS between level of play and technique. RESULTS: Twenty studies (2019 patients/elbows; mean age, 22.13 ± 4 years; 97% male; mean follow-up, 39.9 ± 16.2 months) were included. The majority of patients were baseball players (94.5%), specifically pitchers (80%). The most common level of play was collegiate (44.6%). Palmaris longus (71.2%) and the American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) technique (65.6%) were the most common graft choice and surgical technique, respectively. There was a pooled 86.2% RTS rate, and 90% of players scored excellent/good on the Conway-Jobe scale. RTS rates were higher among collegiate athletes (95.5%) than either high school (89.4%, P = .023) or professional athletes (86.4%, P < .0001). RTS rates were higher for the docking technique (97.0%, P = .001) and the ASMI technique (93.3%, P = .0034) than the Jobe technique (66.7%). CONCLUSION: UCLR is performed most commonly in collegiate athletes. Collegiate athletes have the highest RTS rate after UCLR of all levels of competition. The docking and ASMI techniques had higher RTS rates than the Jobe technique. SAGE Publications 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4687831/ /pubmed/26740956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115618914 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 72
Erickson, Brandon J.
Chalmers, Peter N.
Bush-Joseph, Charles A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: a systematic review of the literature
topic 72
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26740956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967115618914
work_keys_str_mv AT ericksonbrandonj ulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionoftheelbowasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT chalmerspetern ulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionoftheelbowasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT bushjosephcharlesa ulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionoftheelbowasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT vermanikhiln ulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionoftheelbowasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT romeoanthonya ulnarcollateralligamentreconstructionoftheelbowasystematicreviewoftheliterature