Cargando…

Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of use of a 3D printing guide plate in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. MATERIAL/METHODS: We enrolled 43 patients receiving posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. The experimental group underwent 3D printing guide plate-assiste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hongliang, Wu, Dongying, Yang, Huilin, Guo, Kaijin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26681388
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895597
_version_ 1782406695012532224
author Chen, Hongliang
Wu, Dongying
Yang, Huilin
Guo, Kaijin
author_facet Chen, Hongliang
Wu, Dongying
Yang, Huilin
Guo, Kaijin
author_sort Chen, Hongliang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of use of a 3D printing guide plate in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. MATERIAL/METHODS: We enrolled 43 patients receiving posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. The experimental group underwent 3D printing guide plate-assisted posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation, while the control group underwent traditional x-ray-assisted posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. After surgery, CT scanning was done to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement according to the Richter standard. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 1 month. The mean time of placement for each screw and the amount of hemorrhage was 4.9±2.1 min and 8.0±11.1 mL in the experimental group while 6.5±2.2 min and 59.9±13.0 mL in the control group, respectively, with significant differences (p<0.05). The fluoroscopy times of each screw placement was 0.5±0.4 in the experimental group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group 1.2±0.7 (p<0.05). The excellent and good screw placement rate was 100% in the experimental group and 98.4% in the control group, without any statistical difference (P>0.05). No obvious complications were reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional treatment methods, the intra-operative application of 3D printing guide plate can shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of hemorrhage. It can also reduce the fluoroscopy times compared with the traditional fluoroscopy, which cannot improve the accuracy rate of screw placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46879482015-12-29 Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation Chen, Hongliang Wu, Dongying Yang, Huilin Guo, Kaijin Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of use of a 3D printing guide plate in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. MATERIAL/METHODS: We enrolled 43 patients receiving posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. The experimental group underwent 3D printing guide plate-assisted posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation, while the control group underwent traditional x-ray-assisted posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation. After surgery, CT scanning was done to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement according to the Richter standard. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 1 month. The mean time of placement for each screw and the amount of hemorrhage was 4.9±2.1 min and 8.0±11.1 mL in the experimental group while 6.5±2.2 min and 59.9±13.0 mL in the control group, respectively, with significant differences (p<0.05). The fluoroscopy times of each screw placement was 0.5±0.4 in the experimental group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group 1.2±0.7 (p<0.05). The excellent and good screw placement rate was 100% in the experimental group and 98.4% in the control group, without any statistical difference (P>0.05). No obvious complications were reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional treatment methods, the intra-operative application of 3D printing guide plate can shorten the operation time and reduce the amount of hemorrhage. It can also reduce the fluoroscopy times compared with the traditional fluoroscopy, which cannot improve the accuracy rate of screw placement. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4687948/ /pubmed/26681388 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895597 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2015 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Chen, Hongliang
Wu, Dongying
Yang, Huilin
Guo, Kaijin
Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
title Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
title_full Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
title_fullStr Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
title_short Clinical Use of 3D Printing Guide Plate in Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
title_sort clinical use of 3d printing guide plate in posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26681388
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.895597
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhongliang clinicaluseof3dprintingguideplateinposteriorlumbarpediclescrewfixation
AT wudongying clinicaluseof3dprintingguideplateinposteriorlumbarpediclescrewfixation
AT yanghuilin clinicaluseof3dprintingguideplateinposteriorlumbarpediclescrewfixation
AT guokaijin clinicaluseof3dprintingguideplateinposteriorlumbarpediclescrewfixation