Cargando…

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used four-stage approach to develop ROBIS: define the scope, review the evidence base, hold a face-to-face meeting, and refine the tool through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whiting, Penny, Savović, Jelena, Higgins, Julian P.T., Caldwell, Deborah M., Reeves, Barnaby C., Shea, Beverley, Davies, Philippa, Kleijnen, Jos, Churchill, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26092286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
_version_ 1782406695466565632
author Whiting, Penny
Savović, Jelena
Higgins, Julian P.T.
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Reeves, Barnaby C.
Shea, Beverley
Davies, Philippa
Kleijnen, Jos
Churchill, Rachel
author_facet Whiting, Penny
Savović, Jelena
Higgins, Julian P.T.
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Reeves, Barnaby C.
Shea, Beverley
Davies, Philippa
Kleijnen, Jos
Churchill, Rachel
author_sort Whiting, Penny
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used four-stage approach to develop ROBIS: define the scope, review the evidence base, hold a face-to-face meeting, and refine the tool through piloting. RESULTS: ROBIS is currently aimed at four broad categories of reviews mainly within health care settings: interventions, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology. The target audience of ROBIS is primarily guideline developers, authors of overviews of systematic reviews (“reviews of reviews”), and review authors who might want to assess or avoid risk of bias in their reviews. The tool is completed in three phases: (1) assess relevance (optional), (2) identify concerns with the review process, and (3) judge risk of bias. Phase 2 covers four domains through which bias may be introduced into a systematic review: study eligibility criteria; identification and selection of studies; data collection and study appraisal; and synthesis and findings. Phase 3 assesses the overall risk of bias in the interpretation of review findings and whether this considered limitations identified in any of the phase 2 domains. Signaling questions are included to help judge concerns with the review process (phase 2) and the overall risk of bias in the review (phase 3); these questions flag aspects of review design related to the potential for bias and aim to help assessors judge risk of bias in the review process, results, and conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: ROBIS is the first rigorously developed tool designed specifically to assess the risk of bias in systematic reviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46879502016-01-15 ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed Whiting, Penny Savović, Jelena Higgins, Julian P.T. Caldwell, Deborah M. Reeves, Barnaby C. Shea, Beverley Davies, Philippa Kleijnen, Jos Churchill, Rachel J Clin Epidemiol Guidelines OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used four-stage approach to develop ROBIS: define the scope, review the evidence base, hold a face-to-face meeting, and refine the tool through piloting. RESULTS: ROBIS is currently aimed at four broad categories of reviews mainly within health care settings: interventions, diagnosis, prognosis, and etiology. The target audience of ROBIS is primarily guideline developers, authors of overviews of systematic reviews (“reviews of reviews”), and review authors who might want to assess or avoid risk of bias in their reviews. The tool is completed in three phases: (1) assess relevance (optional), (2) identify concerns with the review process, and (3) judge risk of bias. Phase 2 covers four domains through which bias may be introduced into a systematic review: study eligibility criteria; identification and selection of studies; data collection and study appraisal; and synthesis and findings. Phase 3 assesses the overall risk of bias in the interpretation of review findings and whether this considered limitations identified in any of the phase 2 domains. Signaling questions are included to help judge concerns with the review process (phase 2) and the overall risk of bias in the review (phase 3); these questions flag aspects of review design related to the potential for bias and aim to help assessors judge risk of bias in the review process, results, and conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: ROBIS is the first rigorously developed tool designed specifically to assess the risk of bias in systematic reviews. Elsevier 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4687950/ /pubmed/26092286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Guidelines
Whiting, Penny
Savović, Jelena
Higgins, Julian P.T.
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Reeves, Barnaby C.
Shea, Beverley
Davies, Philippa
Kleijnen, Jos
Churchill, Rachel
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
title ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
title_full ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
title_fullStr ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
title_full_unstemmed ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
title_short ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
title_sort robis: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
topic Guidelines
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26092286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT whitingpenny robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT savovicjelena robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT higginsjulianpt robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT caldwelldeborahm robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT reevesbarnabyc robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT sheabeverley robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT daviesphilippa robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT kleijnenjos robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT churchillrachel robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped
AT robisanewtooltoassessriskofbiasinsystematicreviewswasdeveloped