Cargando…

Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach

OBJECTIVES: To clarify and illustrate sample size calculations for the cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) and to present a simple approach for comparing the efficiencies of competing designs within a unified framework. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We summarize design effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemming, Karla, Taljaard, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.015
_version_ 1782406699412357120
author Hemming, Karla
Taljaard, Monica
author_facet Hemming, Karla
Taljaard, Monica
author_sort Hemming, Karla
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To clarify and illustrate sample size calculations for the cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) and to present a simple approach for comparing the efficiencies of competing designs within a unified framework. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We summarize design effects for the SW-CRT, the parallel cluster randomized trial (CRT), and the parallel cluster randomized trial with before and after observations (CRT-BA), assuming cross-sectional samples are selected over time. We present new formulas that enable trialists to determine the required cluster size for a given number of clusters. We illustrate by example how to implement the presented design effects and give practical guidance on the design of stepped wedge studies. RESULTS: For a fixed total cluster size, the choice of study design that provides the greatest power depends on the intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and the cluster size. When the ICC is small, the CRT tends to be more efficient; when the ICC is large, the SW-CRT tends to be more efficient and can serve as an alternative design when the CRT is an infeasible design. CONCLUSION: Our unified approach allows trialists to easily compare the efficiencies of three competing designs to inform the decision about the most efficient design in a given scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4687983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46879832016-01-15 Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach Hemming, Karla Taljaard, Monica J Clin Epidemiol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To clarify and illustrate sample size calculations for the cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) and to present a simple approach for comparing the efficiencies of competing designs within a unified framework. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We summarize design effects for the SW-CRT, the parallel cluster randomized trial (CRT), and the parallel cluster randomized trial with before and after observations (CRT-BA), assuming cross-sectional samples are selected over time. We present new formulas that enable trialists to determine the required cluster size for a given number of clusters. We illustrate by example how to implement the presented design effects and give practical guidance on the design of stepped wedge studies. RESULTS: For a fixed total cluster size, the choice of study design that provides the greatest power depends on the intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and the cluster size. When the ICC is small, the CRT tends to be more efficient; when the ICC is large, the SW-CRT tends to be more efficient and can serve as an alternative design when the CRT is an infeasible design. CONCLUSION: Our unified approach allows trialists to easily compare the efficiencies of three competing designs to inform the decision about the most efficient design in a given scenario. Elsevier 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4687983/ /pubmed/26344808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.015 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hemming, Karla
Taljaard, Monica
Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
title Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
title_full Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
title_fullStr Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
title_full_unstemmed Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
title_short Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
title_sort sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4687983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.015
work_keys_str_mv AT hemmingkarla samplesizecalculationsforsteppedwedgeandclusterrandomisedtrialsaunifiedapproach
AT taljaardmonica samplesizecalculationsforsteppedwedgeandclusterrandomisedtrialsaunifiedapproach