Cargando…

Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone

Limb-salvage for primary malignant bone tumors in pediatric patients presents a unique challenge when resection includes an active physis. Early expandable prostheses required open surgical procedures to achieve lengthening. Newer prostheses are capable of achieving expansion without open procedures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benevenia, Joseph, Patterson, Francis, Beebe, Kathleen, Tucker, Kimberly, Moore, Jeffrey, Ippolito, Joseph, Rivero, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1582-6
_version_ 1782406710713909248
author Benevenia, Joseph
Patterson, Francis
Beebe, Kathleen
Tucker, Kimberly
Moore, Jeffrey
Ippolito, Joseph
Rivero, Steven
author_facet Benevenia, Joseph
Patterson, Francis
Beebe, Kathleen
Tucker, Kimberly
Moore, Jeffrey
Ippolito, Joseph
Rivero, Steven
author_sort Benevenia, Joseph
collection PubMed
description Limb-salvage for primary malignant bone tumors in pediatric patients presents a unique challenge when resection includes an active physis. Early expandable prostheses required open surgical procedures to achieve lengthening. Newer prostheses are capable of achieving expansion without open procedures through the use of an electromagnetic field. This study reports our results with 90 consecutive expansion procedures using the Repiphysis(®) prosthesis. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 20 patients (22 limbs) who underwent limb-salvage using the Repiphysis(®) prosthesis from 2003 to 2015. There were 9 males and 11 females with a mean age of 9 years and 9 months (6–16 years). Reconstruction included the distal femur in 11 cases, total femur in four, proximal tibia in three, proximal humerus in three, and total humerus in one. Complications were reviewed and functional scores were recorded using the MSTS/ISOLS system. Five patients had a second prosthesis implanted during the course of the study for a total of 27 prostheses. The mean follow-up was 57 (6–148) months. Four patients have not been expanded: three due to death prior to lengthening, and one patient who has not yet developed a leg length discrepancy. Ninety consecutive expansion procedures were performed in 18 limbs in 16 patients. A mean of 9 (5–20) mm was gained per expansion and 4.8 cm per patient who has undergone expansion to date. Seven patients have reached skeletal maturity and have been converted to an adult endoprosthesis. These patients averaged 8 expansions per patient and a mean of 7.4 (1.8–12.9) cm in length gained. There were 15 complications in 11 patients including one dislocation, one contracture, four cases of aseptic loosening, five structural failures (three expansion mechanism failures and two tibial fractures), three deep infections, and one case of local recurrence. The mean MSTS score was 80 % (37–97 %) and the limb retention rate was 95 %. The results of this study are comparable to previous studies involving non-invasive prostheses. This study hopefully provides additional data for clinicians to consider when faced with limb threatening sarcomas in the immature skeleton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4688289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46882892015-12-23 Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone Benevenia, Joseph Patterson, Francis Beebe, Kathleen Tucker, Kimberly Moore, Jeffrey Ippolito, Joseph Rivero, Steven Springerplus Research Limb-salvage for primary malignant bone tumors in pediatric patients presents a unique challenge when resection includes an active physis. Early expandable prostheses required open surgical procedures to achieve lengthening. Newer prostheses are capable of achieving expansion without open procedures through the use of an electromagnetic field. This study reports our results with 90 consecutive expansion procedures using the Repiphysis(®) prosthesis. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 20 patients (22 limbs) who underwent limb-salvage using the Repiphysis(®) prosthesis from 2003 to 2015. There were 9 males and 11 females with a mean age of 9 years and 9 months (6–16 years). Reconstruction included the distal femur in 11 cases, total femur in four, proximal tibia in three, proximal humerus in three, and total humerus in one. Complications were reviewed and functional scores were recorded using the MSTS/ISOLS system. Five patients had a second prosthesis implanted during the course of the study for a total of 27 prostheses. The mean follow-up was 57 (6–148) months. Four patients have not been expanded: three due to death prior to lengthening, and one patient who has not yet developed a leg length discrepancy. Ninety consecutive expansion procedures were performed in 18 limbs in 16 patients. A mean of 9 (5–20) mm was gained per expansion and 4.8 cm per patient who has undergone expansion to date. Seven patients have reached skeletal maturity and have been converted to an adult endoprosthesis. These patients averaged 8 expansions per patient and a mean of 7.4 (1.8–12.9) cm in length gained. There were 15 complications in 11 patients including one dislocation, one contracture, four cases of aseptic loosening, five structural failures (three expansion mechanism failures and two tibial fractures), three deep infections, and one case of local recurrence. The mean MSTS score was 80 % (37–97 %) and the limb retention rate was 95 %. The results of this study are comparable to previous studies involving non-invasive prostheses. This study hopefully provides additional data for clinicians to consider when faced with limb threatening sarcomas in the immature skeleton. Springer International Publishing 2015-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4688289/ /pubmed/26702382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1582-6 Text en © Benevenia et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Benevenia, Joseph
Patterson, Francis
Beebe, Kathleen
Tucker, Kimberly
Moore, Jeffrey
Ippolito, Joseph
Rivero, Steven
Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
title Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
title_full Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
title_fullStr Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
title_full_unstemmed Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
title_short Results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the Repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
title_sort results of 20 consecutive patients treated with the repiphysis expandable prosthesis for primary malignant bone
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1582-6
work_keys_str_mv AT beneveniajoseph resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone
AT pattersonfrancis resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone
AT beebekathleen resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone
AT tuckerkimberly resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone
AT moorejeffrey resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone
AT ippolitojoseph resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone
AT riverosteven resultsof20consecutivepatientstreatedwiththerepiphysisexpandableprosthesisforprimarymalignantbone