Cargando…
Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases
More than 10 years have passed since lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR) was introduced for the first time to the world market for the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). It seems like the right time to sum up the relevant results in order to understand where LTDR stands...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Neurosurgical Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.401 |
_version_ | 1782406714569523200 |
---|---|
author | Park, Chun Kun |
author_facet | Park, Chun Kun |
author_sort | Park, Chun Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | More than 10 years have passed since lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR) was introduced for the first time to the world market for the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). It seems like the right time to sum up the relevant results in order to understand where LTDR stands on now, and is heading forward to. The pathogenesis of DDD has been currently settled, but diagnosis and managements are still controversial. Fusion is recognized as golden standard of surgical managements but has various kinds of shortcomings. Lately, LTDR has been expected to replace fusion surgery. A great deal of LTDR reports has come out. Among them, more than 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled studies including USA IDE trials were expected to elucidate whether for LTDR to have therapeutic benefit compared to fusion. The results of these studies revealed that LTDR was not inferior to fusion. Most of clinical studies dealing with LTDR revealed that there was no strong evidence for preventive effect of LTDR against symptomatic degenerative changes of adjacent segment disease. LTDR does not have shortcomings associated with fusion. However, it has a potentiality of the new complications to occur, which surgeons have never experienced in fusion surgeries. Consequently, longer follow-up should be necessary as yet to confirm the maintenance of improved surgical outcome and to observe any very late complications. LTDR still may get a chance to establish itself as a substitute of fusion both nominally and virtually if it eases the concerns listed above. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4688308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46883082015-12-28 Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases Park, Chun Kun J Korean Neurosurg Soc Review Article More than 10 years have passed since lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR) was introduced for the first time to the world market for the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). It seems like the right time to sum up the relevant results in order to understand where LTDR stands on now, and is heading forward to. The pathogenesis of DDD has been currently settled, but diagnosis and managements are still controversial. Fusion is recognized as golden standard of surgical managements but has various kinds of shortcomings. Lately, LTDR has been expected to replace fusion surgery. A great deal of LTDR reports has come out. Among them, more than 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled studies including USA IDE trials were expected to elucidate whether for LTDR to have therapeutic benefit compared to fusion. The results of these studies revealed that LTDR was not inferior to fusion. Most of clinical studies dealing with LTDR revealed that there was no strong evidence for preventive effect of LTDR against symptomatic degenerative changes of adjacent segment disease. LTDR does not have shortcomings associated with fusion. However, it has a potentiality of the new complications to occur, which surgeons have never experienced in fusion surgeries. Consequently, longer follow-up should be necessary as yet to confirm the maintenance of improved surgical outcome and to observe any very late complications. LTDR still may get a chance to establish itself as a substitute of fusion both nominally and virtually if it eases the concerns listed above. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2015-11 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4688308/ /pubmed/26713139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.401 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Park, Chun Kun Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases |
title | Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases |
title_full | Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases |
title_fullStr | Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases |
title_short | Total Disc Replacement in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases |
title_sort | total disc replacement in lumbar degenerative disc diseases |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713139 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkchunkun totaldiscreplacementinlumbardegenerativediscdiseases |