Cargando…

Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of posterior implant rigidity on spinal kinematics at adjacent levels by utilizing a cadaveric spine model with simulated physiological loading. METHODS: Five human lumbar spinal specimens (L3 to S1) were obtained and checked for abnormalities. The fresh specime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chun, Kwonsoo, Yang, Inchul, Kim, Namhoon, Cho, Dosang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.412
_version_ 1782406714796015616
author Chun, Kwonsoo
Yang, Inchul
Kim, Namhoon
Cho, Dosang
author_facet Chun, Kwonsoo
Yang, Inchul
Kim, Namhoon
Cho, Dosang
author_sort Chun, Kwonsoo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of posterior implant rigidity on spinal kinematics at adjacent levels by utilizing a cadaveric spine model with simulated physiological loading. METHODS: Five human lumbar spinal specimens (L3 to S1) were obtained and checked for abnormalities. The fresh specimens were stripped of muscle tissue, with care taken to preserve the spinal ligaments and facet joints. Pedicle screws were implanted in the L4 and L5 vertebrae of each specimen. Specimens were tested under 0 N and 400 N axial loading. Five different posterior rods of various elastic moduli (intact, rubber, low-density polyethylene, aluminum, and titanium) were tested. Segmental range of motion (ROM), center of rotation (COR) and intervertebral disc pressure were investigated. RESULTS: As the rigidity of the posterior rods increased, both the segmental ROM and disc pressure at L4-5 decreased, while those values increased at adjacent levels. Implant stiffness saturation was evident, as the ROM and disc pressure were only marginally increased beyond an implant stiffness of aluminum. Since the disc pressures of adjacent levels were increased by the axial loading, it was shown that the rigidity of the implants influenced the load sharing between the implant and the spinal column. The segmental CORs at the adjacent disc levels translated anteriorly and inferiorly as rigidity of the device increased. CONCLUSION: These biomechanical findings indicate that the rigidity of the dynamic stabilization implant and physiological loading play significant roles on spinal kinematics at adjacent disc levels, and will aid in further device development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4688309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46883092015-12-28 Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study Chun, Kwonsoo Yang, Inchul Kim, Namhoon Cho, Dosang J Korean Neurosurg Soc Laboratory Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of posterior implant rigidity on spinal kinematics at adjacent levels by utilizing a cadaveric spine model with simulated physiological loading. METHODS: Five human lumbar spinal specimens (L3 to S1) were obtained and checked for abnormalities. The fresh specimens were stripped of muscle tissue, with care taken to preserve the spinal ligaments and facet joints. Pedicle screws were implanted in the L4 and L5 vertebrae of each specimen. Specimens were tested under 0 N and 400 N axial loading. Five different posterior rods of various elastic moduli (intact, rubber, low-density polyethylene, aluminum, and titanium) were tested. Segmental range of motion (ROM), center of rotation (COR) and intervertebral disc pressure were investigated. RESULTS: As the rigidity of the posterior rods increased, both the segmental ROM and disc pressure at L4-5 decreased, while those values increased at adjacent levels. Implant stiffness saturation was evident, as the ROM and disc pressure were only marginally increased beyond an implant stiffness of aluminum. Since the disc pressures of adjacent levels were increased by the axial loading, it was shown that the rigidity of the implants influenced the load sharing between the implant and the spinal column. The segmental CORs at the adjacent disc levels translated anteriorly and inferiorly as rigidity of the device increased. CONCLUSION: These biomechanical findings indicate that the rigidity of the dynamic stabilization implant and physiological loading play significant roles on spinal kinematics at adjacent disc levels, and will aid in further device development. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2015-11 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4688309/ /pubmed/26713140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.412 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Laboratory Investigation
Chun, Kwonsoo
Yang, Inchul
Kim, Namhoon
Cho, Dosang
Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
title Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
title_full Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
title_fullStr Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
title_short Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study
title_sort effect of device rigidity and physiological loading on spinal kinematics after dynamic stabilization : an in-vitro biomechanical study
topic Laboratory Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4688309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26713140
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.5.412
work_keys_str_mv AT chunkwonsoo effectofdevicerigidityandphysiologicalloadingonspinalkinematicsafterdynamicstabilizationaninvitrobiomechanicalstudy
AT yanginchul effectofdevicerigidityandphysiologicalloadingonspinalkinematicsafterdynamicstabilizationaninvitrobiomechanicalstudy
AT kimnamhoon effectofdevicerigidityandphysiologicalloadingonspinalkinematicsafterdynamicstabilizationaninvitrobiomechanicalstudy
AT chodosang effectofdevicerigidityandphysiologicalloadingonspinalkinematicsafterdynamicstabilizationaninvitrobiomechanicalstudy